The Recognition Potential and Word Priming

References

• Balota D. A., Lorch R. F., Jr. Depth of automatic spreading activation: Mediated priming effects in pronunciation but not in lexical identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1986; 12: 336–345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett G., Neshinge, Shibasaki H. Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1987; 66: 409–419
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donchin E. Surprise! … Surprise?. Psychophysiology 1981; 18: 493–513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donchin E., Coles M. G. H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1988; 11: 357–374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donders F. C. On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychologica 1868/1969; 30: 412–431, Attention and Performance II (W. G. Koster, Ed.)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbach G., Stanners R., Hochaus L. Repetition and practice effects in a lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition 1974; 2: 337–339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster K. I. Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1981; 33A: 465–495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilden L., Vaughan H. J., Jr., Costa L. D. Summated human EEG potentials with voluntary movement. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1966; 20: 433–438
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howes D. H., Solomon R. L. Visual duration thresholds as a function of word-probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1951; 41: 401–410
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacoby L. L., Dallas M. On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1981; 110: 306–340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffreys D. A., Smith A. T. The polarity inversion of scalp potentials evoked by upper and lower half-field stimulus patterns: latency or surface distribution differences?. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1979; 46: 409–415
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Just M. A., Carpenter P. A. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 1980; 87: 329–354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katznelson R. D. EEG recording, electrode placement, and aspects of generator localization. Electric Fields of the Brain, P. L. Nunez. Oxford University Press, New York 1981; 176–213
   Google Scholar
• Koelega H. S., Verbaten M. N., van Leeuwen T. H., Kenemans J. L., Demner C., Sjouw W. Time effects on event-related brain potentials and vigilance performance. Biological Psychology 1992; 34: 59–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraiuhin C., Yiannikis C., Coyle S., Gordon E., Rennie C., Howson A. L., Meares R. The relationship between reaction time and latency of the P300 event-related potential in normal subjects and Alzheimer's disease. Clinical and Experimental Neurology 1989; 26: 81–88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kucera H., Francis W. N. Computational analysis of present-day American English. Brown University Press, Providence, RI 1967
   Google Scholar
• Magliero A., Bashore T. R., Coles M. G. H., Donchin E. On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. Psychophysiology 1984; 21: 171–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann R. S., Besner D., Davelaar E. Word recognition and identification: Do word frequency effects reflect lexical access?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1988; 14: 693–706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy G., Donchin E. A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science 1981; 211: 77–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael W. F., Halliday A. M. Differences between the occipital distribution of upper and lower field pattern-evoked responses in man. Brain Research 1971; 32: 311–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsell S., Doyle M. C., Haggard P. N. Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1989; 118: 43–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murrell G. A., Morton J. Word recognition and morphemic structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1974; 102: 963–968
   Google Scholar
• Neisser U., Beller H. K. Searching through word lists. British Journal of Psychology 1965; 56: 349–358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfefferbaum A., Christensen C., Ford J. M., Kopell B. S. Apparent response incompatibility effects on P3 latency depend on the task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1986; 64: 424–437
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polich J. P300 in clinical applications: meaning, method, and measurement. American Journal of EEG Technology 1991; 31: 201–231
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard W. S. Psychophysiology of P300. Psychological Bulletin 1981; 89: 506–540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragot R., Renault B. P300 as a function of S-R compatibility and motor programming. Biological Psychology 1981; 13: 289–294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragot R., Renault B. P300 and S-R compatibility: a reply to Magliero. er al. Psychophysiology 1985; 22: 349–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin 1978; 85: 618–660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson-Klavehn A., Bjork R. A. Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology 1988; 39: 475–543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudell A. P. The recognition potential contrasted with the P300. International Journal of Neuroscience 1991; 60: 85–111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudell A. P. Rapid stream stimulation and the recognition potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1992; 83: 77–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudell A. P. Frequency of word usage and perceived word difficulty: Ratings of Kucera and Francis words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 1993; 25: 455–463
   Google Scholar
• Rudell A. P., Cracco R. Q., Hassan N. F., Eberle L. P. Recognition potential: sensitivity to visual field stimulatie. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1993; 87: 221–234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudell A. P., Hua J. The Recognition Potential and Conscious Awareness. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
   Google Scholar
• Rugg M. D. Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high and low frequency words. Memory and Cognition 1990; 18: 367–379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg M. D., Furda J., Lorist M. The effects of task on the modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition. Psychophysiology 1988; 25: 55–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabol M. A., DeRosa D. V. Semantic encoding of isolated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1976; 2: 58–68
   Google Scholar
• Scarborough D. L., Cortese C., Scarborough H. S. Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1977; 3: 1–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibasaki H., Barrett G., Halliday E., Halliday A. M. Components of the movement-related cortical potential and their scalp topography. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1980; 49: 213–226
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simon J. R., Berhaum K. Effects of conflicting cues on information processing: The “Stroop effect” vs. the “Simon effect”. Acta Psychologica 1990; 73: 159–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon J. R., Rudell A. P. Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology 1967; 51: 300–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton S., Braren M., Zubin J., John E. R. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 1965; 150: 1187–1188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verleger R. Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1988; 11: 343–427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West R. F., Stanovich K. E. Source of inhibition in experiments on the effect of sentence context on word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1982; 8: 385–399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood C. C., McCarthy G., Squires N. K., Vaughan H. G., Jr., Woods D. L., McCallum W. C. Anatomical and physiological substrates of event-related potentials: two case studies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1984; 425: 681–721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young M. P., Rugg M. D. Word frequency and multiple repetition as determinants of the modulation of event-related potentials in a semantic classification task. Psychophysiology 1992; 29: 664–676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar