12
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Local luminance and pattern reversal stimuliyield different visual evoked potential topography

&
Pages 127-141 | Received 05 May 1997, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Barrett G., Blumhardt L., Halliday A. M., Halliday E., Kriss A. A paradox in the lateralization of the visual evoked response. Nature 1976; 261: 253–255
  • Baseler H. A., Sutter E. E., Klein S. A., Carney T. The topography of VEP response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1994; 90: 65–81
  • Hoffmann K., Skrandies W., Lehmann D., Witte H., Strobel J. Instantaneous frequency maps, dipole models, and potential distributions of pattern reversal evoked potential fields for correct recognition of stimulated hemiretinae. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1996; 100: 569–578
  • Jedynak A., Skrandies W. Functional perimetry combined with topographical VEP analysis. International Journal of Neuroscience
  • Lehmann D., Skrandies W. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1980; 48: 609–621
  • Lehmann D., Darcey T. M., Skrandies W. Intracerebral and scalp fields evoked by hemiretina checkerboard reversal, and modelling of their dipole generators. Clinical Applications of Evoked Potentials in Neurology, J. Courjon, F. Mauguiere, M. Re vol. Raven Press, New York 1982; 41–48
  • Marmarelis P. Z., Marmarelis V. Z. Analysis of Physiological Systems: The White-Noise Approach. Plenum Press, New York 1978
  • Østerberg G. Topography of the layer of rods and cones in the human retina. Acta Ophthalmological 1935; 1–102, Suppl. 6
  • Perry N. W., Childers D. G. The Human Visual Evoked Response. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois 1969; 183
  • Regan D. Comparison of transient and steady-state methods. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1982; 388: 45–71
  • Regan D., Cartwright R. F. A method of measuring the potentials evoked by simultaneous stimulation of different retinal regions. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1970; 28: 314–319
  • Shagass C., Amadeo M., Roemer R. A. Spatial distribution of potentials evoked by half-field pattern-reversal and pattern-onset stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1976; 41: 609–622
  • Skrandies W. Human contrast sensitivity: regional retinal differences. Human Neurobiology 1985a; 4: 95–97
  • Skrandies W. Critical flicker fusion and double flash discrimination in different parts of the visual field. International Journal of Neuroscience 1985b; 25: 225–231
  • Skrandies W. The upper and lower visual field of man: electrophysiological and functional differences. Progress in Sensory Physiology 1987; 8: 1–93
  • Skrandies W. Visual information processing: topography of brain electrical activity. Biological Psychology 1995; 40: 1–15
  • Skrandies W., Baier M. The standing potential of the human eye reflects differences between upper & lower retinal areas. Vision Research 1986; 26: 577–581
  • Skrandies W., Lehmann D. Spatial principal components of multichannel maps evoked by lateral visual half-field stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1982; 54: 662–667
  • Skrandies W., Leipert K. P. Pattern ERGs and VEP topography evoked by lateral eccentric-pattern reversal stimulation. International Journal of Neuroscience 1988; 39: 137–146
  • Skrandies W., Richter M., Lehmann D. Checkerboard evoked potentials: topography and latency for onset, offset, and reversal. Progress in Brain Research 1980; 54: 291–295
  • Srebro R. An analysis of the VEP to luminance modulation and of its nonlinearity. Vision Research 1992; 32: 1395–1404
  • Stone J., Johnston E. The topography of primate retina: a study of the human, bushbaby, and New- and Old-World monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1981; 196: 205–223
  • Sutter E. E. A deterministic approach to nonlinear systems analysis. Nonlinear Vision: Determination of Receptive Fields, Function, and Networks, R. B. Pinter, B. Nabet. CRC Press, Cleveland, Ohio 1992; 171–220
  • Sutter E. E., Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man. 1. The photopic luminance response. Vision Research 1992; 32: 433–446
  • Sutter E. E., Vaegan P. Lateral interaction component and local luminance nonlinearities in the human pattern reversal ERG. Vision Research 1990; 30: 659–671
  • Wäβle H., Peichl L., Boycott B. B. Topography of horizontal cells in the retina of domestic cat. Proceedings of the Royal Society London (Biol) 1978; 203: 269–291

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.