Presentation of Words to Separate Hemispheres Prevents Interword Illusory Conjunctions

References

• Banich M. T. The missing link: The role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing. Brain and Cognition, in press
   Google Scholar
• Banich M. T., Belger A. Interhemispheric interaction: How do the hemispheres divide and conquer a task. Cortex 1990; 26: 77–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banich M. T., Karol D. L. The sum of the parts does not equal the whole: Evidence from bihemispheric processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992; 18: 763–784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belger A., Banich M. T. Interhemispheric interaction affected by computational complexity. Neuropsychologia 1992; 30: 923–929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarello C., Maxfield L. Varieties of interhemispheric inhibition. Brain and Cognition 1996; 30: 81–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson R. J., Hugdahl K. Brain asymmetry. The MIT Press., Cambridge 1995
   Google Scholar
• Dimond S. J. The double brain. Churchill., Edinburgh 1972
   Google Scholar
• Dimond S. J., Beaumont G. Use of two cerebral hemispheres to increase brain capacity. Nature 1971; 232: 270–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman A., Polson M. C. The hemispheres as independent resources: Limited-capacity processing and cerebral specialization. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance 1981; 7: 1031–1058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellige J. B. Hemispheric asymmetry: What's right and what's left. Harvard University Press., Cambridge 1993
   Google Scholar
• Kinsbourne M., Hicks R. E. Functional cerebral space: A model for overflow, transfer and interference effects in human performance. Attention and performance VII, J. Requin. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale 1978; 345–362
   Google Scholar
• Liederman J. The Stroop effect is as strong between as within hemispheres. Paper presented at the annuad metting of the International Neuropsychological Society, San Diego, February, 1985
   Google Scholar
• Liederman J. Interhemispheric interference during word naming. International Journal of Neuroscience 1986; 30: 43–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liederman J. Subtraction in addition to addition: Dual task performance improves when tasks are presented to separate hemispheres. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1986; 8: 487–502
   Google Scholar
• Liederman J. A reinterpretation of the split-brain syndrome: Implications for the function of cortico-cortical fibers. Bruin Asymmetry, R. Davidson, K. Hugdahl. MIT Press, Cambridge 1995; 451–490
   Google Scholar
• Liederman J. Evolving notions of mechanisms of interhemispheric cooperation during information processing. Laterality 1996; 1: 241–254
   Google Scholar
• Liederman J., Meehan P. When is between hemisphere division of labor advantageous. Neuropsychologia 1986; 24: 863–874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liederman J., Merola J., Hoffman C. Longitudinal data indicate that hemispheric independence increases during early adolescence. Developmental Neuropsychology 1986; 2: 182–201
   Google Scholar
• Liederman J., Merola J., Martinez S. Interhemispheric collaboration in response to simultaneous bilateral input. Neuropsychologia 1985; 23: 673–683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merola J., Liederman J. Developmental changes in hemispheric independence. Child Development 1985; 56: 1184–1194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merola J., Liederman J. The effect of Lask difficulty upon the extent to which performance benefits from between-hemisphere division of inputs. lnternationul Journal of Neuroscience 1990; 51: 35–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller L. K. Perceptual independence of hemifields in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1981; 32: 298–312
   Google Scholar
• Mozer M. C. Letter migration in word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance 1993; 9: 531–546
   Google Scholar
• Norman W. D., Jeeves M. A., Milner A., Ludwig T. Hemispheric interactions: The bilateral Advantage and task difficulty. Cortex 1992; 28: 623–642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield R. The assessment and analysis of handedness. Neuropsychologic 1971; 9: 97–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler H., O'Brien S. Dual-task interference and the cerebral hemispheres. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993; 19: 315–330
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polson M. C., Friedman A. Task-sharing within and between hemispheres: A multiple-resources approach. Human Factors 1988; 30: 633–643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sereno A. B., Kosslyn S. M. Discrimination within and between hemifields: A new constraints and theories of attention. Neuropsychologia 1991; 29: 659–675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn Y. S., Liederman J., Reinitz M. T. Division of inputs between the hemispheres eliminates illusory conjunctions: Evidence of hemispheric independence. Neuropsychologia 1996; 34: 1057–1068
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sperry R. W., Gazzaniga M. S., Bogen J. E. Interhemispheric relationships: The neocortical commissures; syndromes of disconnection. Handbook of Clinical Neurologj 1969; 4: 273–290
   Google Scholar
• Treisman A., Schmidt H. Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology 1982; 14: 107–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar