References
- Bowers D., Heilman K. M. Material specific hemispheric arousal. Neuropsychologia, login 1976; 14: 123–127
- Braine L. G. Asymmetries of pattern perception observed in Israelis. Neuropsychologia 1968; 6: 73–88
- Chedru Leblanc F. M., Lhermitte F. Visual searching in normal and braindamaged subjects (contribution to the study of unilateral inattention). Corlex 1973; 9: 94–111
- Chokron S., Imbert M. Influence of reading habits on line bisection. Cognitive Bruin Research 1993; 1: 219–222
- Chokron S., DeAgostino M. Reading habits and line bisection: A developmental approach. Cognitive Brain Research 1995; 3: 51–58
- Chokron S., Bernard J. M., Imbert M. Length representation in normal and neglect subjects with opposite reading habits studied through a line extension task. Cortx 1997; 33: 47–64
- Dawson D. K., Tanner-Cohen C. Visual scanning patterns in an adult Chinese population: preliminary normative data. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 1997; 17: 264–279
- DcRcnzi E., Faglioni P., Scott G. Hemispheric contribution to exploration of space through the visual and tactile modality. Cortex 1970; 6: 191–203
- Eviatar Z. Reading direction and attention: Effects on lateralized ignoring. Brain and Cognition 1995; 29: 137–150
- Gauthier L., Dehaut F., Joanette Y. The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitativc test for visual neglect. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 1989; 11: 49–54
- Geldmacher D. S., Doty L., Heilman K. M. Spatial performance bias in normal elderly subjects on a letter cancellation task. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology 1994; 7: 275–280
- Geldmacher D. S., Doty L., Heilman K. M. Letter cancellation performance in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology 1995; 8: 259–263
- Geldmacher D. S. Effects of stimulus number and target-to-distractor ratio on the performance of random array letter cancellation tasks. Bruin and Cognition 1996; 32: 405–415
- Geldmacher D. S., Hills E. C. Effect of stimulus number, target-to-distractor ratio and motor speed on visuospatial search quality following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 59–66
- Heilman K. M., Watson R. T., Valenstein E. Neglect and related disorders. Clinical Neuropsychology, K. M. Heilman, E. Valenstein. Oxford University Press., New York 1993; 279–336
- Hills E. C., Geldmacher D. S. The effect of character and array type on visual spatial search quality following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 69–76
- Kinsbourne M. Direction of gaze and distribution of cerebral thought processes. Neuropsychologia 1974; 12: 270–281
- Lincoln R. S., Averbach E. Spatial factors in check reading of dial groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 1956; 40: 105–108
- Mesulam M.-M. Attention, confusional states, and neglect. Principles of Behavioral Neurology, M.-M. Mesulam. F. A. Davis Co., Philadelphia 1985; 125–168
- Nachson L. Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli. International Journal of Neuroscience 1985; 25: 161–174
- Posner M. L., Presti D. E. Selective attention and cognitive contol. Trends in Neuroscience 1987; 10: 13–17
- Schwartz R. L., Adair J. C., Na D., Williamson D. J. G., Heilman K. M. Spatial bias: Attentional and intentional influence in normal subjects. Neurology 1997; 48: 234–242
- Vingiano W. Pseudoneglect on a cancellation task. International Journal of Neuroscience 1991; 58: 63–67
- Weintraub S., Mesulam M.-M. Right cerebral dominance in spatial attention. Further evidence based on ipsilateral neglect. Archives of Neurology 1987; 44: 625–625
- Weintraub S., Mesulam M.-M. Visual hemispatial inattention: Stimulus parameters and exploratory strategies. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1988; 51: 1481–1488