Invited Review: The Biology of the T Cell in the Mouse

References

• Miller J. F. A. P., Mitchell G. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. I. Hemolysin-forming cells in neonatally thymectomized mice reconstituted with thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 1968; 128: 801–820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell G. F., Miller J. F. A. P. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. 11. the source of hemolysin-forming cells in irradiated mice given bone marrow and thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 1968; 128: 821–837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinkernagel R. M., Doherty P. C. Immunological surveillance against altered self components by sensitized T lymphocytes in lymphocytic choriomeningitis. Nature 1974; 251: 547–548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon R. K. T cell control of antibody production. Contemp. Top. Immunobiol. 1974; 3: 1–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Germain R. N., Benacerraf B. Helper and suppressor T cell factors. Springer Semin. Immunopathol. 1980; 3: 93–127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schrader J. Nature of the T cell receptor. Scand. J. Immunol. 1979; 10: 387–393
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerne N. K. The somatic generation of immune recognition. Eur. J. Immunol. 1971; 1: 1–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gillis S., Watson J. Interleukin-2 dependent cultures of cytolytic T cell lines. Immunol. Rev. 1981; 54: 81–109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas W. R., Mottram P., Miller J. F. A. P. Hapten-specific T cell lines mediating delayed hypersensitivity to contact sensitizing agents. J. Exp. Med. 1982; 156: 300–305
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKimm-Breschkin J. L., Mottram P. L., Thomas W. R., Miller J. F. A. P. Antigen-specific production of immune interferon by T cell lines. J. Exp. Med. 1982; 155: 1204–1209
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finn O. J., Boniver J., Kaplan H. S. Induction establishment in vitro, and characterization of functional antigen-specific, carrier-primed murine T-cell lymphomas. Proc. Nat. Acad. Aci. USA 1979; 76: 4033–4037
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kohler G., Milstein C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 1975; 256: 495–497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milstein C. Monoclonal antibodies from hybrid myelomas. Proc. R. Soc. Lond.(Bid.) 1981; 211B: 393412
   Google Scholar
• Nisonoff A., Ju S-T., Owen F. L. Studies of structure and immunosuppression of a cross-reactive idiotype in strain A mice. Immunol. Rev. 1977; 34: 89–118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eichmann K. Expression and function of idiotypes on lymphocytes. Adv. Immunol. 1978; 26: 195–254
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morahan G. Characterization of a determinant of the cross-reactive idiotype on anti-azobenzenearsonate antibodies of A/J mice with a monoclonal anti-idiotype antibody. Aust. J. Exp. Bid. Med. Sci. 1982, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Jerne N. K. Towards a network theory of the immune response. Ann. Immunol. Inst. Pasteur 1974; 125: 373–389
   Google Scholar
• Thomas W. R., Morahan G., Walker I. D., Miller J. F. A. P. Induction of delayed-type hypersensitivity to azobenzenearsonate by a monoclonal anti-idiotype antibody. J. Exp. Med. 1981; 153: 743–747
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurosawa Y., von Boehmer H., Haas W., et al. Identification of D segments of immunoglobulin heavy-chain genes and their rearrangement in T lymphocytes. Nature 1981; 290: 565–570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack R. S., Imanishi-Kari T., Rajewsky K. Idiotypic analysis of the response of C57BL/6 mice to the (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl) acetyl group. Eur. J. Immunol. 1977; 7: 559–565
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sage K., Peterson P. A. Use of anti-idiotypic antibodies as cell-surface receptor probes. Proc. Nut. Acad. Sci. USA 1978; 15: 2443–2447
   Google Scholar
• Miller J. F. A. P., Thomas W. R., Morahan G. Cell interactions in the development of delayed-type hypersensitivity. Mechanisms of Lymphocyte Activation, K. Resch, H. Kirchner. Elsevier, North Holland, Amsterdam 1981; 139–148
   Google Scholar