New examination of the performance of the MetaMax I metabolic analyser with the Douglas-bag technique

References

• Douglas CG. A method for determining the total respiratory exchange in man. J Physiol 1911;42:P17–P18.
   Google Scholar
• Geppert J, Zuntz N. Ueber die regulation der athmung. Pflügers Arch 1888;42:189–245.
   Google Scholar
• Medbø JI, Mamen A, Welde B, von Heimburg ED, Stokke R. Examination of the Metamax I and II oxygen analysers during exercise studies in the laboratory. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2002;62:585–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åstrand P-O, Rodahl K, Dahl HA, Strømme SB. Textbook of work physiology, 4th edn. Champaign, IL, USA: Human Kinetics; 2003. p. 276.
   Google Scholar
• Louhevaara V, Ilmarinen J, Oja P. Comparison of three field methods for measuring oxygen consumption. Ergonomics 1985;28:463–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medbø JI, Mohn A-C, Tabata I, Bahr R, Vaage O, Sejersted OM. Anaerobic capacity determined by maximal accumulated O2 deficit. J Appl Physiol 1988;64:50–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane DJ. Automated metabolic gas analysis systems. Sports Med 2001;31:841–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer T, Davison RC, Kindermann W. Ambulatory gas exchange measurements – current status and future options. Int J Sports Med 2005;26 Suppl 1:S19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resaland GK, Mamen A, Anderssen SA, Andersen LB. Cardiorespiratory fitness and body mass index values in 9-year-old rural Norwegian children. Acta Paediatr 2009;98: 687–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gramvik P, Aaserud R, Liavåg S, Medbø JI. Aerobic and anaerobic energy release during giant slalom. Acta Kinesiol Univ Tartuensis 2006;11:20–39.
   Google Scholar
• Scholander PF. Analyzer for accurate estimation of respiratory gases in one-half cubic centimeter samples. J Biol Chem 1947;167:235–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Medbø JI. Examination of different ways to establish relationships between the O2 demand and the exercise intensity. Acta Kinesiol Univ Tartuensis 2005;10:89–115.
   Google Scholar
• Medbø JI. Accumulated oxygen deficit issues. In: Connes P, Hue O, Perrey S, editors. Exercise physiology: from a cellular to an integrative approach. Amsterdam: IOS press. Biomedical and Health Research 75. 2010, 367–85.
   Google Scholar
• Mamen A, Laparidis K, Tillaar RVD. Precision in estimating maximal lactate steady state performance in running using a fixed blood lactate concentration or a delta value from an incremental lactate profile test. Int J Appl Sports 2011;23:212–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ingjer F. Factors influencing assessment of maximal heart rate. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1991;1:134–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ballal MA, Macdonald IA. An evaluation of the Oxylog as a portable device with which to measure oxygen consumption. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1982;3:57–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brehm MA, Harlaar J, Groepenhof H. Validation of the portable VmaxST system for oxygen-uptake measurement. Gait Posture 2004;20:67–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter J, Jeukendrup AE. Validity and reliability of three commercially available breath-by-breath respiratory systems. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002;86:435–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouter SE, Antczak A, Hudak JR, DellaValle DM, Haas JD. Accuracy and reliability of the ParvoMedics TrueOne 2400 and MedGraphics VO2000 metabolic systems. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006;98:139–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffield R, Dawson B, Pinnington HC, Wong P. Accuracy and reliability of a Cosmed K4b2 portable gas analysis system. J Sci Med Sport 2004;7:11–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann JC, Brisko N, Shadrick D, Welsh S. Comparative analysis of the Cosmed Quark b2 and K4b2 gas analysis systems during submaximal exercise. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2003;43:150–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss Ø, Hallén J. Validity and stability of a computerized metabolic system with mixing chamber. Int J Sports Med 2005;26:569–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore CJ, Clark RJ, Shipp NJ, Van Der Ploeg GE, Withers RT. CPX/D underestimates VO(2) in athletes compared with an automated Douglas bag system. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:1341–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsson PU, Wadell KM, Jakobsson EJ, Burlin LU, Henriksson-Larsen KB. Validation of the MetaMax II portable metabolic measurement system. Int J Sports Med 2004;25:115–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent CM, Meyers MC, Robinson CA, Strong LR, Chase C, Goodwin B. Validity of the VmaxST portable metabolic measurement system. J Sports Sci 2008;26:709–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lothian F, Farrally MR, Mahoney C. Validity and reliability of the Cosmed K2 to measure oxygen uptake. Can J Appl Physiol 1993;18:197–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melanson EL, Freedson PS, Hendelman D, Debold E. Reliability and validity of a portable metabolic measurement system. Can J Appl Physiol 1996;21:109–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Novitsky S, Segal KR, Chatr-Aryamontri B, Guvakov D, Katch VL. Validity of a new portable indirect calorimeter: the AeroSport TEEM 100. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1995;70:462–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinnington HC, Wong P, Tay J, Green D, Dawson B. The level of accuracy and agreement in measures of FEO2, FECO2 and VE between the Cosmed K4b2 portable, respiratory gas analysis system and a metabolic cart. J Sci Med Sport 2001;4:324–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieur F, Castells J, Denis C. A methodology to assess the accuracy of a portable metabolic system (VmaxST). Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:879–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietjens GJWM, Kuipers H, Kester ADM, Keizer HA. Validation of a computerized metabolic measurement system (Oxycon-Pro®) during low and high intensity exercise. Int J Sports Med 2001;22:291–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogler AJ, Rice AJ, Gore CJ. Validity and reliability of the Cortex MetaMax3B portable metabolic system. J Sports Sci 2010;28:733–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong LE, Costill DL. Variability of respiration and metabolism: response to submaximal cycling and running. Res Q Exerc Sports 1985;56:93–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers H, Verstappen FT, Keizer HA, Geurten P, van Kranenburg G. Variability of aerobic performance in the laboratory and its physiologic correlates. Int J Sports Med 1985;6:197–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawakami Y, Nozaki D, Matsuo A, Fukunaga T. Reliability of measurement of oxygen uptake by a portable telemetric system. Eur J Appl Physiol 1992;65:409–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King GA, McLaughlin JE, Howley ET, Bassett DR Jr, Ainsworth BE. Validation of Aerosport KB1-C portable metabolic system. Int J Sports Med 1999;20:304–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wideman L, Stoudemire NM, Pass KA, McGinnes CL, Gaesser GA, Weltman A. Assessment of the TEEM 100 portable metabolic measurement system. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996;28:509–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin JE, King GA, Howley ET, Bassett DR Jr, Ainsworth BE. Validation of the Cosmed K4 b2 portable metabolic system. Int J Sports Med 2001;22:280–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd RJ. A critical examination of the Douglas bag technique. J Physiol 1955;127:515–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fogelholm M. Physical activity, fitness and fatness: relations to mortality, morbidity and disease risk factors. A systematic review. Obes Rev 2010;11:202–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resaland GK, Andersen LB, Mamen A, Anderssen SA. Effects of a 2-year school-based daily physical activity intervention on cardiorespiratory fitness: the Sogndal school-intervention study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2011;21: 302–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar