Comparison between ADVIA Chemistry systems Enzymatic Creatinine_2 method and ADVIA Chemistry systems Creatinine method (kinetic Jaffe method) for determining creatinine

References

• Myers GL, Miller WG, Coresh J, Fleming J, Greenberg N, Greene T, Hostetter T, Levey AS, Panteghini M, Welch M, Eckfeldt H. Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement: A report from the laboratory working group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program. Clin Chem 2006;52:5–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badiou S, Dupuy AM, Descomps B, Cristol JP. Comparison between the enzymatic Vitros assay for creatinine determination and three other methods adapted on the Olympus analyzer. J Clin Lab Anal 2003;17:235–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srisawasdi P, Chaichanajarernkul U, Teerakanjana N, Vanavanan S, Kroll MH. Exogenous interferences with Jaffe creatinine assays: addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate to reagent eliminates bilirubin and total protein interference with Jaffe methods. J Clin Lab Anal 2010;24:123–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheuiche AV, Soares AA, Camargo EG, Weinert LS, Camargo JL, Silveiro SP. Comparison between IDMS-traceable Jaffe and enzymatic creatinine assays for estimation of glomerular filtration rate by the CKD-EPI equation in healthy and diabetic subjects. Clin Biochem 2013;46:1423–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery S, Stevens PE, Dalton RN, van Lente F, Lamb EJ. Does the ID-MS traceable MDRD equation work and is it suitable for use with compensated Jaffé and enzymatic creatinine assays?Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:2439–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chromý V, Rozkošná K, Sedlák P. Determination of serum creatinine by Jaffe method and how to calibrate to eliminate matrix interference problems. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008; 46:1127–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drion L, Cobbaert C, Groenier KH, Weykamp C, Bilo HJG, Wetzels JFM, Kleefstra N. Clinical evaluation of analytical variations in serum creatinine measurements: why laboratories should abandon Jaffe techniques. BMC Nephrol 2012; 13:133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming JJ, Swaminathan S. Interference in autoanalyzer analysis. Indian J Clin Biochem 2001;16:22–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glick MR, Ryder KW, Jackson SA. Graphical comparisons of interferences in clinical chemistry instrumentation. Clin Chem 1986;32:470–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji JZ, Meng QH. Evaluation of the interference of hemoglobin, bilirubin, and lipids on Roche Cobas 6000 assays. Clin Chim Acta 2011;412:1550–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chianea D, Renard C, Garcia C, Mbongo E, Monpeurt C, Vest P. Vérification initiale d'une nouvelle méthode de dosage de la créatinine plasmatique sur UniCel® DxC 600 selon les recommandations du LAB GTA 04 [Validation of plasma creatinine measurement on UniCel® DxC 600 according to LAB GTA 04 recommendation]. Ann Biol Clin 2010;68:285–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995;346:1085–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuster N, Bargnoux AS., Pageaux GP, Cristol JP. Limitations of compensated Jaffe creatinine assays in cirrhotic patients. Clin Biochem 2012;45:320–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Brocco G, Guidi GC. Influence of hemolysis on routine clinical chemistry testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006; 44:311–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panteghini M. Enzymatic assay for creatinine: time for action. Cin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:567–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutten A, Bargnoux AS, Carlier MC, Delanaye P, Rozet E, Delatour V, Cavalier E, Hanser AM, Froissart M, Cristol JP, Piéroni L. Enzymatic but not compensated Jaffe methods reach the desirable specifications of NKDEP at normal levels of creatinine: Results of the French multicentric evaluation. Clin Chim Acta 2013; 419:132–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobbaert CM, Baadenhuijsen H, Weykamp CW. Prime time for enzymatic creatinine methods in pediatrics. Clin Chem 2009;55:549–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Guo X, Zhu Y, Shou W, Gong M, Zhang L, Han H, Quan G, Xu T, Li H, Li X. Effect of picric acid and enzymatic creatinine on the efficiency of the glomerular filtration rate predicator formula. Clin Lab 2013;59: 511–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piéroni L, Delanaye P, Boutten A, Bargnoux AS, Rozet E, Delatour V, Carlier MC, Hanser AM, Cavalier E, Froissart M, Cristol JP. A multicentric evaluation of IDMS-traceable creatinine enzymatic assays. Clin Chim Acta 2011;412:2070–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panteghini M, Myers GL, Miller WG, Greenberg N. IFCC. The importance of metrological traceability on the validity of creatinine measurement as an index of renal function. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:1287–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker H, Shephard MDS, White GH. Evaluation of an enzymatic method for determining creatinine in plasma. J Clin Pathol 1988;41:576–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg N, Roberts WL, Bachmann LM, Wright EC, Dalton RN, Zakowski JJ, Miller WG. Specificity characteristics of 7 commercial creatinine measurement procedures by enzymatic and Jaffe method principles. Clin Chem 2012;58:391–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu WS, Chung YT, Yang CY, Lin CC, Tsai KH, Yang WC, Chen TW, Lai YT, Li SY, Liu TY. Serum creatinine determined by Jaffe, enzymatic method, and isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in patients under hemodialysis. J Clin Lab Anal 2012;26:206–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak TWL, Cheung CK, Cheung CMF, Leung CB, Lam CWK, Lai KN. Interference of creatinine measurement in CAPD fluid is dependent on glucose and creatinine concentrations. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997;12:184–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuyts B, Bernard D, Van Den Noortgate N, Van De Walle J, Van Vlem B, De Smet R, De Geeter F, Vanholder R, Delanghe JR. Reevaluation of formulas for predicting creatinine clearance in adults and children, using compensated creatinine methods. Clin Chem 2003;49: 1011–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peake M, Whiting M. Measurement of serum creatinine-current status and future goals. Clin Biochem Rev 2006; 27:173–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Owen LJ, Keevil BG. Does bilirubin cause interference in Roche creatinine methods?Clin Chem 2007; 53:370–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar