257
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Determining sample size when assessing mean equivalence

, &
Pages 713-715 | Received 05 Jun 2014, Accepted 08 Aug 2014, Published online: 17 Sep 2014

References

  • Limentani GB, Ringo MC, Ye F, Berquist ML, McSorley EO. Beyond the t-test: statistical equivalence testing. Anal Chem 2005;77:221A–26A.
  • Chatfield MJ, Borman PJ. Acceptance criteria for method equivalency assessments. Anal Chem 2009;81:9841–8.
  • Åsberg A, Solem KB, Mikkelsen G. Allowable systematic difference between two instruments measuring the same analyte. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Published Online First: 9 June 2014. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2014.921836.
  • Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2010; p 133.
  • Phillips KF. Power of the two one-sided tests procedure in bioequivalence. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1990;18:137–44.
  • Åsberg A, Bolann B, Mikkelsen G. Using the confidence interval of the mean to detect systematic errors in one analytical run. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2010;70:410–4.
  • Borman PJ, Chatfield MJ, Damjanov I, Jackson P. Design and analysis of method equivalence studies. Anal Chem 2009; 81:9849–57.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.