References
- Dudley H AF. The clinical task. Lancet 1970; 2: 1272–4
- Dudley H AF. Clinical method. Lancet 1971; 1: 27–7
- Campbell E JM. The diagnosing mind. Lancet 1987; 1: 849–51
- Hilden J. The concept of medical usefulness in clinical chemistry and the difficulty of applying it to questions of research policy. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1980; 40: 31–46, suppl 155
- Sunderman FW. Current concept of “normal values”, “reference values”, and “discrimination values” in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem 1975; 21: 1873–7
- Hilden J. Undga misbrug af klinisk-statistiske begreber i vurderingen af diagnostika. Ugeskr Laeger 1986; 148: 1028–30
- Wulff H. Rationel klinik. Grundlaget for diagnostisk og terapeutiske beslutninger2nd ed. Munksgaard, Copenhagen 1981
- Sox H C, Hickam D H, Marton K I, Moses L, Skeff K M, Sox C H, Neal EA. Using the patient's history to estimate the probability of coronary disease: a comparison of primary care and referral practices. Amer J Med 1990; 89: 7–14
- Gerhardt W, Keller H. Evaluation of test data from clinical studies. I. Terminology, graphic interpretation, diagnostic strategies, and selection of sample groups. II. Critical review of the concepts of efficiency, receiver operated characteristics (ROC), and likelihood ratios. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1986; 46: 1–74, suppl 181
- Valenstein PN. Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards. Am J Clin Pathol 1990; 93: 252–8
- Zweig M H, Robertson EA. Why we need better test evaluations. Clin Chem 1982; 28: 1272–6
- Robertson E A, Zweig M H, Van Steirteghem AC. Evaluating the clinical efficacy of laboratory tests. Am J Clin Pathol 1983; 79: 78–86
- Gardner M I, Altman DG. Statistics with confidence - confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. British Medical Journal, London 1989
- Arkin C F, Wachtel MS. How many patients are necessary to assess test performance. JAMA 1990; 263: 275–8
- Simel D L, Samsa G P, Matchar DB. Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic studies. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 763–70
- White G H, Fraser CG. The evaluation kit for clinical chemistry: A practical guide for the evaluation of methods, instruments and reagent kits. J Autom Chem 1984; 6: 122–41
- Begg CB. Statistical methods in medical diagnosis. Crit Rev Med Inform 1986; 1: 1–22
- Sweets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988; 240: 1285–93
- McNeil B J, Hanley JA. Statistical approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Med Dec Making 1984; 4: 129–50
- Guyatt G H, Patterson C, Ali M, Singer J, Levine M. Diagnosis of iron-deficiency anemia in the elderly. Am J Med 1990; 88: 205–9
- Holland W W, Whitehead TP. Value of new laboratory tests in diagnosis and treatment. Lancet 1974; 2: 391–4
- Report of the Herlev Group Hospital Study Diagnostic decision-process in suspected pulmonary embolism. Lancet 1979; 1: 1336–8
- Gjørup T. Klinisk vurdering af diagnostiske undersøgelsesmetoder. (Dissertation), Lasgeforeningens forlag, Copenhagen 1988
- Royal H D, McNeil BJ. The evaluation and impact of diagnostic tests. Diagnostic nuclear medicine2nd ed., A Gottschalk, PB Hoffer, EJ Potchen, HJ Berger. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1988; Volume 1.: 105–23
- Rose G. Reflections on the changing times. Br Med J 1990; 301: 683–7
- Eddy DM. Connecting value and costs. Whom do we ask, and what do we ask them?. JAMA 1990; 264: 1729–9
- Rothman KJ. Modern epidemiology. Little, Brown and Company, Boston 1986
- Feinstein AR. Clinical Epidemiology. The architecture of clinical research. WB Saunders, Philadelphia 1985
- Albert A. On the use and computation of likelihood ratios in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem 1982; 28: 1113–9
- Rosthøj S, Møller-Petersen J. In defence of the likelihood ratio. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1987; 47: 631–3
- Linnet K. A review on the methodology for assessing diagnostic tests. Clin Chem 1988; 1379–86
- Sackett D L, Hayenes R B, Tugwell P. Clinical epidemiology. A basic science for clinical medicine. Little, Brown and Company, Boston 1985
- Gambino R. The misuse of predictive value - or why you must consider the odds. Lab Report 1989; 11: 65–72