References
- Zweig M H., Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 1993; 39: 561–77
- Fuentes Arderiu J, Cases Regany E, Juan Pereira L, MaciàMontserrat M, Martínez Casademont M, Miró Balagué J, Queraltó CompañoT J M., Valdiguié P. Capacidad discriminante (I). Quim Clín 1985; 4: 129–32
- Galen R S., Gambino S R. Beyond normality: The predictive value and efficiency of medical diagnosis. Wiley J and Sons, New York 1975; 237
- Robertson E A., Zweig M H., Van Steirteghem A C. Evaluating the clinical efficacy of laboratory tests. Am J Clin Pathol 1983; 79: 78–86
- Robertson E A., Zweig M H. Use of receiver operating characteristic curves to evaluate the clinical performance of analytical systems. Clin Chem 1981; 27: 1569–74
- Hanley J A. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: state of the art. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1989; 29: 307–35
- Beck J R., Shultz E K. The use of relating operating characteristic (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986; 110: 13–20
- Swets J A. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988; 240: 1285–93
- Hanley J A., McNeil B J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29–36
- Hermann G A., Suguira H T., Krumm R P. Comparison of thyrotropin assays by relative operating characteristic analysis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986; 110: 21–5
- Zweig M H., Broste S K., Reinhart R A. ROC curve analysis: an example showing the relationships among serum lipid and apoliprotein concentrations in identifying patients with coronary artery disease. Clin Chem 1992; 38: 1425–8
- Magid E. Some concepts and principles of clinical test evaluation. Monograph prepared by a working group for the Nordic Clinical Chemistry Project (NORDKEM). Scan J Clin Lab Invest 1992; 52(Suppl 208)35–50
- National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Assessment of clinical sensitivity and specificity of laboratory tests; Proposed Guideline. NCCLS publication GP10-P. NCCLS, Villanova, PA. 1987
- Gerhardt W, Keller H. Evaluation of test data for clinical studies. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1985; 46(Suppl 181)1–74
- Agarwal N, Pitchumoni C S., Sivaprasad A V. Evaluating tests for acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85: 356–66
- Moossa A R. Diagnostic tests and procedures in acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 639–43
- Silverstein W, Isikoff M B., Hill M C., Barkin J. Diagnostic imaging of acute pancreatitis: prospective study using CT and sonography. AJR 1981; 137: 497–502
- Lott J A., Ellison E C., Applegate D. The importance of objective data in the diagnosis of pancreatitis. Clin Chim Acta 1989; 183: 33–40
- Dürr G HK. Acute pancreatitis. The exocrine pancreas, H T. Howatt, H Sarles. WB Saunders, London 1979; 352–401
- Tietz N W., Shuey D F., Astles J R. Turbidimetric measurement of lipase activity-problems and some solutions. Clin Chem 1987; 33: 1624–9
- Pellar T G., Leung F Y., Henderson A R. A computer program for rapid generation of receiver operating characteristic curves and likelihood ratios in the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Ann Clin Biochem 1988; 25: 411–6
- Hanley J A., McNeil B J. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839–43
- Steinberg W B., Goldstein S S., Davis N D., Shamma'a J, Anderson K. Diagnostic assays in acute pancreatitis. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102: 576–80
- MoUer-Petersen J, Kiaerke M, Dati F. Evaluation and comparison of cathodic trypsin-like immunor-eactivity, pancreatic lipase and pancreatic isoamy-lase in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in 849 consecutive patients with acute abdominal pain. Clin Chim Acta 1986; 157: 151–66
- Ventrucci M, Pezzilli R, Gullo L, Plate L, Sprovieri G, Barbara L. Role of serum pancreatic enzyme assays in diagnosis of pancreatic disease. Dig Dis Sci 1989; 34: 39–45
- Van Lente F, Kazmierczak S C. Immunologically-derived pancreatic amylase, pancreatic lipase and total amylase compared as predictors of pancreatic inflammation. Clin Chem 1989; 35: 1542
- García Merlo S, Grijalba Uche A, Palacios Sarrasqueta M, Calvo Guitiain M, Salcedo Gayaralde M E. α-Amilasa pancreática en el diagnóstico diferencial del abdomen agudo. Quím Clin 1990; 9: 22–8
- Kazmierczak S C., Van Lente F, Hodges E D. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of phosphoslipase A activity in patients with acute pancreatitis: comparison with amylase and lipase. Clin Chem 1991; 37: 356–60