Development and validation of a theoretical test in non-anaesthesiologist-administered propofol sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy

References

• Pelosi P. Retraction of endorsement: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates, and the European Society of Anaesthesiology guideline: non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2012;44:302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehrmann T, Triantafyllou K. Propofol sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a gastroenterologist’s perspective. Digestion. 2010;82:106–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumonceau JM, Riphaus A, Aparicio JR, et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates, and the European Society of Anaesthesiology guideline: non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2010;42:960–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Heuss LT, Walker JA, et al. Trained registered nurses/endoscopy teams can administer propofol safely for endoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1384–1391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohls-Gatzoulis JA, Regehr G, Hutchison C. Teaching cognitive skills improves learning in surgical skills courses: a blinded, prospective, randomized study. Can J Surg. 2004;47:277–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savran MM, Clementsen PF, Annema JT, et al. Development and validation of a theoretical test in endosonography for pulmonary diseases. Respiration. 2014;88:67–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savran MM, Hansen HJ, Petersen RH, et al. Development and validation of a theoretical test of proficiency for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2598–2604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankland S, editor. Enhancing teaching and learning through assessment: deriving an appropriate model. Hong Kong: Springer; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Case SM, Swanson DB. Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences. Philadelphia (PA): National Board of Medical Examiners; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Roediger HL, Karpicke JD. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol Sci. 2006;17:249–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kromann CB, Jensen ML, Ringsted C. The effect of testing on skills learning. BMC Med Educ. 2009;43:21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kromann CB, Bohnstedt C, Jensen ML, et al. The testing effect on skills learning might last 6 months. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010;15:395–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: written assessment. BMJ. 2003;326:643–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth L. Written assessments. In: Dent JA, Harden RM, editors. A practical guide for medical teachers. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2009. p. 325–332.
   Google Scholar
• Downing SM, Yudkowsky R. Written tests: assessment in health professions education. New York (NY): Routledge; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Dumonceau JM, Riphaus A, Beilenhoff U, et al. European curriculum for sedation training in gastrointestinal endoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA). Endoscopy. 2013;45:496–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JT, Konge L, Moller A, et al. Endoscopy nurse-administered propofol sedation performance. Development of an assessment tool and a reliability testing model. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:1014–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JT, Vilmann P, Horsted T, et al. Nurse-administered propofol sedation for endoscopy: a risk analysis during an implementation phase. Endoscopy. 2011;43:716–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Propofol sedation foretaget af ikke -anæstesiuddannet personale til gastroenterologiske procedurer - og uddannelse til [Web page]. yumpu.com; 2011. Available from: https://www.yumpu.com/da/document/view/22252729/propofol-sedation-foretaget-af-ikke-herlev-hospital.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen JL, Thellesen L, Strandbygaard J, et al. Development of knowledge tests for multi-disciplinary emergency training: a review and an example. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59:123–133.
   Google Scholar
• Haladyna T. Guidelines for developing MC items. In: Haladyna TM, editor. Developing and validating multiple-choice test items. London: Routledge; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association tAPANCoMiE. The standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington (DC): American Educational Research Association; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Graham B, Regehr G, Wright JG. Delphi as a method to establish consensus for diagnostic criteria. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1150–1156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch R, Norman G. Generalizability theory for the perplexed: a practical introduction and guide: AMEE Guide No. 68. Med Teach. 2012;34:960–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing SM, Yudkowsky R. Assessment in health professions education. New York (NY): Routledge; 2009. xx, p. 317.
   Google Scholar
• Webb EM, Phuong JS, Naeger DM. Does educator training or experience affect the quality of multiple-choice questions? Acad Radiol. 2015;22:1317–1322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna HP. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001;38:195–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna HP. The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing? J Adv Nurs. 1994;19:1221–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell P, Scherer K. The Delphi technique as a method for selecting criteria to evaluate nursing care. Nurs Pap. 1983;15:51–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loughlin KG, Moore LF. Using Delphi to achieve congruent objectives and activities in a pediatrics department. J Med Educ. 1979;54:101–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook DA, Thompson WG, Thomas KG. Test-enhanced web-based learning: optimizing the number of questions (a randomized crossover trial). Acad Med. 2014;89:169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustine DLP, Khavandi A. MCQs for cardiology knowledge based assessment. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Duff JP, Cheng A, Bahry LM, et al. Development and validation of a multiple choice examination assessing cognitive and behavioural knowledge of pediatric resuscitation: a report from the EXPRESS pediatric research collaborative. Resuscitation. 2013;84:365–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar