Advanced search
Publication Cover
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology Volume 51, 2016 - Issue 7
Submit an article Journal homepage
348
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A critical appraisal of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) in the treatment of rectal adenoma: a 4-year experience with 51 cases

Sven-Petter HaugvikDepartment of Surgery, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway; Correspondence[email protected]
,
Sigrid GrovenDepartment of Surgery, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway;
,
Johan BondiDepartment of Surgery, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway;
,
Torolf VåganDepartment of Pathology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway
,
Stig Ove BrynhildsvollDepartment of Pathology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway
&
Ole Christian OlsenDepartment of Surgery, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway;
Pages 855-859 | Received 23 Dec 2015, Accepted 20 Feb 2016, Published online: 22 Mar 2016

References

  • Miskovic D, Foster J, Agha A, et al. Standardization of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a structured international expert consensus. Ann Surg. 2015;261:716–722.
  • Cho MS, Kim CW, Baek SJ, et al. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients. Surgery. 2015;157:1121–1129.
  • Vennix S, Pelzers L, Bouvy N, et al. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4:CD005200.
  • Clancy C, Burke JP, Albert MR, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus standard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58:254–261.
  • Barendse RM, van den Broek FJ, van SJ, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection vs transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of large rectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:e191–e196.
  • Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2200–2205.
  • Gill S, Stetler JL, Patel A, et al. Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): Standardizing a Reproducible Procedure. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:1528–1536.
  • Hahnloser D, Cantero R, Salgado G, et al. Transanal minimal invasive surgery for rectal lesions: should the defect be closed? Colorectal Dis. 2015;17:397–402.
  • Lee TG, Lee SJ. Transanal single-port microsurgery for rectal tumors: minimal invasive surgery under spinal anesthesia. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:271–280.
  • Lim SB, Seo SI, Lee JL, et al. Feasibility of transanal minimally invasive surgery for mid-rectal lesions. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:3127–3132.
  • Maglio R, Muzi GM, Massimo MM, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS): new treatment for early rectal cancer and large rectal polyps-experience of an Italian center. Am Surg. 2015;81:273–277.
  • Martin-Perez B, Andrade-Ribeiro GD, Hunter L, et al. A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18:775–788.
  • Molina G, Bordeianou L, Shellito P, et al. Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution. Surg Endosc. 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4452-y.
  • Schiphorst AH, Langenhoff BS, Maring J, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: initial experience and short-term functional results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:927–932.
  • Verseveld M, Barendse RM, Gosselink MP, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: impact on quality of life and functional outcome. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1184–1187.
  • Albert MR, Atallah SB, deBeche-Adams TC, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in. The first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:301–307.
  • Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, et al. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2010.
  • Porembka MR, Hall BL, Hirbe M, et al. Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:286–298.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.