The Effect of Loperamide on Bowel Habits and Anal Sphincter Function in Patients with Ileoanal Anastomosis

References

• Tytgat G N, Huibregtse K, Dagevos J, Van Den Ende A. Effect of loperamide on fecal output and composition in well-established ileostomy and ileo-rectal anastomosis. Dig Dis Sci 1977; 22: 669–676
   Google Scholar
• King R FGJ, Norton T, Hill G L. A double-blind crossover study of the effect of loperamide hydrochloride and codeine phosphate on ileostomy output. Aust NZ J Surg 1982; 52: 121–124
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Becker J M, Hillar A E, Mann F A, Kestenberg A, Nelson J A. Functional assessment after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileoanal pull-through. World J Surg 1985; 9: 598–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubrick M P, Jacobs D M, Levy M. Experience with the endorectal pull-through and S pouch for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis in adults. Surgery 1985; 98: 689–699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coran A G, Jordan F T, Wesley J R. The endorectal pull-through for the management of familial polyposis. Int Surg 1985; 70: 335–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams N S, Johnston D. The current status of mucosal protectomy and ileo-anal anastomosis in the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis and adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 159–168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yagasaki O, Suzuki H, Sohji Y. Effects of loperamide on acetylcholin and prostaglandin release from isolated guinea pig ileum. Jpn J Pharmacol 1978; 28: 873–882
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niemegeers C JE, McGuire J L, Heykants J JP, Janssen P AJ. Dissociation between opiate-like and antidiarrheal activities of antidiarrheal drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1979; 210: 327–333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heel R C, Brogden R N, Speight T M, Avery G S. Loperamide: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in diarrhoea. Drugs 1978; 15: 33–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emblem R, Bergan A, Larsen S. Straight ileoanal anastomosis with preserved anal mucosa for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1988; 23: 913–919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emblem R, Stien R, Mørkrid L. Anal sphincter function after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1989; 24: 171–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emblem R, Bergan A, Flatmark A. Mucosal proctectomy with straight ileoanal anastomosis. A comparison of two methods. Scand J Gastroenterol 1988; 23: 1165–1172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pemberton J H, Heppell J, Beart R W, Dozois R R, Telander R L. Endorectal ileoanal anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982; 155: 417–424
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith L E. A review of twenty-one rectal mucosectomy and ileal pouch pull through procedures. Am Surg 1986; 52: 182–187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pescatori M, Parks A G. The sphincteric and sensory components of preserved continence after ileoanal reservoir. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1984; 158: 517–521
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dozois R R. Ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1985; 72(suppl.)80–82
   Google Scholar
• O'Connell P R, Pemberton J H, Brown M L, Kelly K A. Determinants of stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Surg 1987; 153: 157–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill G L. Ileostomy, surgery, physiology, and management. Grune & Stratton Inc., New York 1976
   Google Scholar
• Hylander E, Ladefoged K, Nielsen M L, Nielsen O V, Thale M, Jarnum S. Excretion, deconjugation, and absorption of bile acids after colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1986; 21: 1137–1143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlman T, Graf W, Nilsson L H. The effect of sterculia bulk on the viscosity of stomal output from twelve patients with ileostomy. Scand J Gastroenterol 1978; 13: 485–488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond J, Becker J M, Sharp S, Schipke C. Stool output following colectomy, mucosal proctectomy and endorectal ileoanal pull-through. Gastroenterology 1985; 88: 1550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips S F. Diarrhea: a current view of the pathophysiology. Gastroenterology 1972; 63: 495–518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill G L, Mair W SJ, Goligher J C. Impairment of ‘ileostomy adaptation’ in patients after ileal resection. Gut 1974; 15: 982–987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read M, Read N W, Barber D C, Duthie H L. Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgency. Dig Dis Sci 1982; 27: 807–814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelemans W, Vantrappen G. A double blind crossover comparison of loperamide with diphenoxylate in the symptomatic treatment of chronic diarrhea. Gastroenterology 1976; 70: 1030–1034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldo J A, Orinion E A, Simpelo R V, Check F E, Beauregard W. Differential response of longitudinal and circular muscles of intact canine colon to morphine and bethanechol. Gastroenterology 1971; 60: 438–444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dajani E Z, Roge E AW, Bertermann R E. Effects of E prostaglandins, diphenoxylate and morphine on intestinal motility in vivo. Eur J Pharmacol 1975; 34: 105–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basilisco G, Bozzani A, Camboni G, et al. Effect of loperamide and naloxone on mouth-to-caecum transit time evaluated by lactulose hydrogen breath test. Gut 1985; 26: 700–703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann P A, Read N W, Holdsworth C D, Barends D. Role of loperamide and placebo in management of irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis Sci 1984; 29: 239–247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remington M, Malagelada J R, Zinsmeister A, Fleming C R. Abnormalities in gastrointestinal motor activity in patients with short bowels: effect of a synthetic opiate. Gastroenterology 1983; 85: 629–636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller L R, Davis G R, Santa Ana C A. Studies of the mechanism of the antidiarrheal effect of codeine. J Clin Invest 1982; 70: 999–1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass D D, Ustach T J, Schuster M M. In vitro pharmacologic differentiation of sphincteric and non-sphincteric muscle. Johns Hopkins Med J 1970; 127: 185–191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conklin J L, Christensen J. Local specialization at ileocecal junction of the cat and opossum. Am J Physiol 1975; 228: 1075–1081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellow J, Borody T, Brown M, Phillips S F. Effects of morphine on motility and transit in human small intestine. Gastroenterology 1985; 88: 1442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKirdy H C. Effect of loperamide on human isolated internal anal sphincter. J Physiol 1981; 316: 18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett R C, Duthie H L. The functional importance of the internal anal sphincter. Br J Surg 1964; 51: 355–357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooms L AA, Degryse A D, Janssen P AJ. Mechanisms of action of loperamide. Scand J Gastroenterol 1984; 19(suppl 96)145–155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellstrand T. Loperamide–an opiate receptor agonist with gastrointestinal motility effects. Scand J Gastroenterol 1987; 22(suppl 130)65–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillen U, Berggren A, Rubenson A. Loperamide– a new principle for the treatment of incontinence and unstable bladder. Lakaresallsk Riksstamma 1984; 133
   Google Scholar