Antacids: New Perspectives in Cytoprotection

References

• Weberg R, Aubert E, Dahlberg O, et al. Low- dose antacids or cimetidine for duodenal ulcer'?. Gastroenterology 1988; 9s7: 146s–1469
   Google Scholar
• Berstad A, Weberg R. Antacids for peptic ulcer: do we have anything better?. Scand J Gastroenterol 1986; 21: 144–149, suppl 125
   Google Scholar
• Pace F, Broker J H, Casparty W, et al. Treatment gastric ulcer with low-dose antacid gel and cimedicine: a multicentre double-blind trial. Dtsch Med Wocheschr 1985; 10: 283–2847
   Google Scholar
• Priebe J H, Skillman J J, Buschnell L S, Long P C, Silen W. Antacid versus cimetidine in preventing acute gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized trial in 75 critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 1980; 302: 426–430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigelt J A, Aurbakken C M, Gewertz B L, Snyder WH. Cimetidine vs antacid in prophylaxis for stress ulceration. Arch Surg 1981; 116: 597–601
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robert A, Nezamis J E, Lancaster C, et al. Cyto-protection by prostaglandins in rats. Prevention of gastric necrosis produced by alcohol, HC1, NaOH, hypertonic NaCl and thermal injury. Gastroenterology 1979; 77: 433–443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarnawski A. Cytoprotection. A new fashion or real progress?. Pol Arch Med Wewn 1980; 64: 97–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tarnawski A, Hollander D. Cytoprotection of gastric and duodenal mucosa. The Royal Society of Medicine. Curr Med Lit Gastroenterol 1987; 6: 3–9
   Google Scholar
• Konturek S J, Radecki T, Brzozowski T, et al. Gastric cytoprotection by prostaglandins, ranitidine and probanthine in rats. Scand J Gastroenterol 1981; 16: 7–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarnawski A, Hollander D, Gergely H, Stachura J. Comparison of antacid, sucralfate, cimetidine and ranitidine in protection of the gastric mucosa against ethanol injury. Am J Med 1985; 79(2C)19–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marti-Bonmati E, Alino S F, Loris J M, et al. Effects of cimetidine, atropine and prostaglandin E2 on rat mucosal erosions produced by intragastric distension. Eur J Pharmacol 1980; 68: 49–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szollosi G, Udvardi J, Nafradi J, Balint G A, Karac-Sony G, Varro V. Indomethacin induced gastric ulcerin the rat. Progress in peptic ulcer, G Mozsik, T Javor. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest 1976; 529–541
   Google Scholar
• Hagel J, Renner H, Hirsch M, et al. Gastric cytoprotection by antacids and papaverine in rats. Hep-atogastroentcrology 1982; 29: 271–274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szelenyi I, Postius S, Engler H. Evidence for a functional cytoprotective effect produced by antacids in the rat stomach. Eur J Pharmacol 1983; 88: 403–406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander D, Tarnawski A, Cummings D, Krause W J, Gergely H, Zipser RD. Cytoprotective action of antacids against alcohol induced gastric mucosal injury. Morphological, ultrastructural and functional time sequence analysis. Gastroenterology 1984; 86: 1114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppin H, Hagel J, Kachel G, Domschke S, Domschke W. Gastric cytoprotection in rat and man by various drugs: contrasting and competitive results. New pharmacology of ulcer disease, S Szabo, G Mozsik. Elsevier, New York 1987; 57–67
   Google Scholar
• Tarnawski A, Hollander D, Krause W J, Gergely H. Cytoprotection of the gastric mucosa by antacids and sucralfate but not by the H, blockers. Dig Dis Sci 1988; 33: 911
   Google Scholar
• Tarnawski A, Hollander D, Stachura J, Krause W J, Gergely H. Prostaglandin protection of the gastric mucosa against alcohol injury–dynamic time related process. The role of the mucosal proliferative zone. Gastroenterology 1985; 89: 366–374
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka H. Gastric cytoprotection of aceglutamide aluminum in rats. Arzneimittelforsch 1986; 36: 1485–1489
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szelenyi I, Brune K. Possible role of sulfhydryls in mucosal protection induced by aluminum hydroxide. Dig Dis Sci 1986; 31: 1207–1210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarnawski A, Hollander D, Cummings D, Krause W J, Gergely H, Zipser RD. Are antacids acid neutralizes only? Histology, ultrastructural and functional changes in normal gastric mucosa induced by antacids. Gastroenterology 1984; 86: 1276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quadros E, Johnson J V, Wilson DE. Antacids stimulate prostaglandin (PG) release from gastric mucosa. Gastroenterology 1986; 90: 1595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szelenyi I, Lanz R. Release of cytoprotective PGE, from cultured macrophages induced by antacids and sucralfate. Agents Actions 1986; 18: 375–380
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Domschke W, Hagel J, Ruppin H, Kaduk B. Antacids and gastric mucosal protection. Scand J Gastroenterol 1986; 21: 144–149, suppl 125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florent C, Flourie B, Pfeiffer A, Bernier JJ. Mesure de la difference de potentiel transepitheliale gas-trique. Effet des agents agressifs (aspirine, alcool) et des pansement gastriques. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1985; 9(12 bis)58–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caspary WF. Measurement of intragastric potential difference (PD). Antacids in the eighties, F Halter. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Munich. 1982; 64–68
   Google Scholar
• Grant R, Grossman M I, Ivy AC. Histological changes in the gastric mucosa during digestion and their relationship to mucosal growth. Gastroenterology 1953; 25: 218–231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarnawski A, Hollander D, Krause W J, Stachura J, Gergely H. Does sucralfate affect the normal gastric mucosa? Histologic, ultrastructural and functional assessment in the rat. Gastroenterology 1986; 90: 893–906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konturek S J, Kwiecien N, Obtulowicz W, Hebzda Z, Oleksy J. Effects of protective drugs on gastric alkaline secretion in man. Scand J Gastroenterol 1987; 22: 1059–1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones S L, Marriott C. An investigation of the effect of an antacid mucosal protective on gastric mucus. Pharm Acta Helv 1982; 57: 265–267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tarnawski A, Stachura J, Gergely H., Hollander D. Microvascular endothelium–a major target for alcohol injury of the human gastric mucosa. Histo-chemical and ultrastructural study. J Clin Gastroenterol 1988; 10(1)554–564
   Google Scholar
• Szabo S, Trier J S, Brown A, Schnor J. Early vascular injury and increased vascular permeability in gastric mucosal injury caused by ethanol in the rat. Gastroenterology 1985; 88: 228–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarnawski A, Hollander D, Stachura J. Ultra-structural changes in the gastric mucosal micro-vessels after ethanol. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1985; 9(12 bis)93–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robins PG. Ultrastructural observations on the pathogenesis of aspirin-induced gastric erosions. Br J Exp Pathol 1980; 61: 497–504
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tarnawski A, Stachura J, Hollander D, Sarfeh I J, Bogdal J. Cellular aspects of alcohol-induced injury and prostaglaindin protection of the human gastric mucosa. Focus on the mucosal microvessels. J Clin Gastroenterol 1988; 10: 535–545
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer C J, Sethbhakdi S. Vascular impairment– an etiology factor in peptic ulcer?. Peptic ulcer, C Pfeiffer. Munksgaard, Copenhagen 1971; 207–219
   Google Scholar
• Szelenyi I, Postius S. Further evidence for gastro-protection induced by aluminium hydroxide in the rat. Z Gastroenterol 1986; 24: 717–721
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preclik G, Stange E F, Gerber K, Fetzer G, Horn H, Ditschuneit H. Stimulation of endogenous prostaglandin synthesis by antacids in human gastric and duodenal mucosa. Gastroenterology 1987; 92: 1579
   Google Scholar
• Arnold R, Koop H, Schwarting H, Tuch K, Wil-Lemer B. Effect of acid inhibition on gastric endocrine cells. Scand J Gastroenterol 1986; 21: 14–19, suppl 125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar