Growth of Colorectal Polyps: Recovery and Evaluation of Unresected Polyps of Less Than 10 mm, 1 Year after Detection

References

• Hoff G, Foerster A, Vatn M H., Sauar J, Larsen S. Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and colon. Recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps 2 years after detection. Scand J Gastroenterol 1986; 21: 853–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoernscmld H E. Growth rate and malignant potential of colonic polyps: early results. Surg Forum 1963; 14: 137–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morson B C. The polyp-cancer sequence in the large bowel. Proc R Soc Med 1974; 67: 451–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shinya H, Wolff W I. Morphology, anatomic distribution and cancer potential of colonic polyps. Ann Surg 1979; 190: 679–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waye J D. The development of carcinoma of the colon. Am J Gastroenterol 1977; 67: 427–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstad B, Vatn M, Hoff G, et al. Growth of colorectal polyps. Design of a prospective, randomized, placebo controlled intervention study in patients with colorectal polyps. Eur J Cancer Prevent 1992; 1: 415–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hofstad B, Vatn M, Larsen S, Osnes M. Reliability of in situ measurements of colorectal polyps. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992; 27: 59–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman D G. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London 1992
   Google Scholar
• Bland J M., Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 8: 307–10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman D G., Bland J M. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983; 32: 307–17
   Google Scholar
• Matek W, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Demling L. Follow-up of patients with colorectal adenomas. Endoscopy 1985; 17: 175–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermanek P, Fruhmorgen P, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, et al. The malignant potential of colorectal polyps–a new statistical approach. Endoscopy 1983; 15: 16–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronborg O, Fenger C. Prognostic evaluation of planned follow-up in patients with colorectal adenomas. An interim report. Int J Colorectal Dis 1987; 2: 203–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waye J D., Braunfeld S. Surveillance intervals after colonoscopic polypectomy. Endoscopy 1982; 14: 79–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener M, Borsch G, Schmidt G. Colorectal adenomas: distribution, incidence of malignant transformation and rate of recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 1986; 29: 383–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtzman R, Poulard J-B, Bank S, et al. Repeat colonoscopy after endoscopic polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1987; 30: 185–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neugut Al, Johnsen C M., Forde K A., et al. Recurrence rate for colorectal polyps. Cancer 1985; 55: 1586–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry L G., Condon R E., Schulte W J., et al. Risk of recurrence of colon polyps. Ann Surg 1975; 182: 511–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen H W., Lawrence W A., Snook C W., et al. Review of recurrent polyps and cancer in 500 patients with initial colonoscopy for polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 1988; 31: 222–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morson B C., Bussey H JR. Magnitude of risk for cancer in patients with colorectal adenomas. Br J Surg 1985, Suppl: S23–28
   Google Scholar
• Kronborg O, Hage E, Adamsen S, Deichgraeber E. Follow-up after colorectal polypectomy. II. Repeated examinations of the colon every 6 months after removal of sessile adenomas and adenomas with the highest degrees of dysplasia. Scand J Gastroenterol 1983; 18: 1095–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronborg O, Hage E, Adamsen S, Deichgraeber E. Follow-up after colorectal polypectomy. I. A comparison of the effectiveness of repeated examinations of the colon every 6 and 24 months after removal of stalked polyps. Scand J Gastroenterol 1983; 18: 1089–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckardt V F., Fuchs M, Kanzler G, et al. Follow-up of patients with colonic polyps containing severe atypia and invasive carcinoma. Compliance, recurrence, and survival. Cancer 1988; 61: 2552–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown-Eyssen G E., Holloway C, Jazmaji V, et al. A randomized trial of vitamins C and E in the prevention of recurrence of colorectal polyps. Cancer Res 1988; 48: 4701–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolfson I K., Eckholdt G J., Wetzel C R., et al. Usefulness of performing colonoscopy one year after endoscopic polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1990; 33: 389–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nava H, Carlsson G, Petrelli N J., et al. Follow-up colonoscopy in patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 1987; 30: 465–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashiro K, Nagasako K, Sato S, et al. Follow-up after polypectomy of colorectal adenomas. The importance of total colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 1989; 3: 87–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dundey P, Weston P MT, Williams N S. Is colonoscopy better than barium enema?. Lancet 1987; 2: 549–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kronborg O, Hage E, Deichgraeber E. The clean colon. Scand J Gastroenterol 1981; 16: 879–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hixon L J., Fennerty M B., Sampliner R E., et al. Prospective study of the frequency and size of polyps missed by colonoscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 1769–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byrd R L., Boggs H W., Slagle G W., et al. Reliability of colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32: 1023–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warneke J, Petrelli N, Herrera L, et al. Accuracy of colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 981–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfand D W., Chen M Y., Ott D J. Benign colorectal neoplasms undetected by colonoscopy. Gastrointest Radiol 1992; 17: 344–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norfleet R G., Ryan M E., Wyman J B., et al. Barium enema versus colonoscopy for patients with polyps found during flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 531–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine J E., O'Connor J, Frost R A., et al. Prospective comparison of double contrast barium enema plus flexible sigmoidoscopy v colonoscopy in rectal bleeding: barium enema v colonoscopy in rectal bleeding. Gut 1988; 29: 1188–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinicke J L., Dodds W J., Hogan W J., et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and roentgenography for detecting polypoid lesions of the colon. Gastrointest Radiol 1977; 2: 125–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faivre J, Boutron M C., Bataillon P. Causation and prevention of colorectal cancer. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam 1987; 29–35
   Google Scholar
• Knoernschild H E. The use of a tattooing instrument for marking colonic mucosa. Am J Surg 1962; 103: 83–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman N, Waye J D. Endoscopic four quadrant tattoo for the identification of colonic lesions at surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 56–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennerty M B., Sampliner R E., Hixon L J., et al. Effectiveness of india ink as a long-term colonic mucosal marker. Am J Gastroenterol 1992; 87: 79–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S I., Genta R S., Romeo D P., et al. Colonic abscess and focal peritonitis secondary to india ink tattooing of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 68–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coman E, Brandt L J., Brenner S, et al. Fat necrosis and inflammatory pseudotumor due to endoscopic tattooing of the colon with india ink. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 65–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar