Is There a Significant Increase in Bile Duct Width after Cholecystectomy?

References

• Nuboer J. Die Altersveränderungen der extrahepatischen Gallen-wege. Frankfurter Z Pathol 1931; 42: 292–5
   Google Scholar
• Peustow C, Morrison R. The relationship of cholecystitis and cholecystectomy to dilatation of the choledochus. Ann Surg 1935; 101: 599–602
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandweiss D, Fulton H. Intravenous cholangiography. JAMA 1955; 159: 998–1001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gylstorff H, Faber H. Choledochus changes after cholecystectomy (pre- and postoperative examination of 400 patients). Acta Chir Scand 1963; 125: 499–501
   Google Scholar
• LeQuesne L, Whiteside C, Hand B. The common bile duct after cholecystectomy. Br Med J 1959; 195: 329–32
   Google Scholar
• Anderson F. The biliary tract in the normal and cholecystecto-mized patient. Am J R 1957; 78: 623–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qvist C. The influence of cholecystectomy on the normal common bile duct. Acta Chir Scand 1957; 113: 30–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wise R, O'Brien R. Interpretation of the intravenous cholangiogram. JAMA 1956; 160: 819–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmunds R, Rucker C, Finby N. Intravenous cholangiography. Arch Surg 1965; 90: 73–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bodvall B. Late results following cholecystectomy in 1930 cases and special studies on postoperative biliary distress. Acta Chir Scand 1964; 329, Suppl
   Google Scholar
• Jonson M. Width of the common bile duct before and after morphine studied by cholegraphy. Acta Radiol 1960; 54: 345–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes J, LoCurcio S, Edmunds R, Finby N. The common duct after cholecystectomy. JAMA 1966; 197: 247–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt D, Scott J. Changes in bile duct diameter after cholecystectomy: a 5-year prospective study. Gastroenterology 1989; 97: 1485–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham M, Cooperberg P, Cohen M, Burhenne H. The size of the normal hepatic duct following cholecystectomy: an ultrasonographic study. Radiology 1980; 135: 137–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göransson A. Cholegraphy. Its applicability and reliability in connection with gallstone operations. Acta Chir Scand 1980; 1–95, Suppl 496
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammarstrom L-E, Holmin T, Ebbesen A, Stridbeck H. Influence of cholecystectomy on bile duct width. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 1706–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alinder G, Nilsson U, Lunderquist A, Herlin P, Holmin T. Preoperative infusion cholangiography compared to routine operative cholangiography at elective cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 383–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly J, Fitzgerald T, Simpson J. Pre-operative intravenous cholangiography as an alternative to routine operative cholangiography in elective cholecystectomy. Clin Radiol 1987; 38: 161–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy S, Southham J. Is intravenous cholangiography an alternative to the routine peroperative cholangiogram?. Postgrad Med J 1989; 65: 896–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Watteville J, Gailleton R, Gayral F, Testas P. Role of routine pre-operative intravenous cholangiography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1992; 79, SuppkSlO
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell G. Adverse reactions to contrast agents. Scope of problem. Invest Radiol 1970; 5: 374–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederau C, Sonnenberg A, Mueller J. Comparison of the extra-hepatic bile duct size measured by ultrasound and by different radiographic methods. Gastroenterology 1984; 87: 615–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauerbrei E, Cooperberg P, Gordon P, Li D, Cohen M, Burhenne H. The discrepancy between radiographic and sonographic bile-duct measurements. Radiology 1980; 137: 751–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler R, Goldberg H. Combined cholangiography and cholecystography using sodium iopanoate. Invest Radiol 1977; 12: 267–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weill F, Eisencher A, Zeltner F. Ultrasonic study of the normal and dilated biliary tree. Radiology 1978; 127: 221–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parulekar S. Ultrasound evaluation of common bile duct size. Radiology 1979; 133: 703–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller P, Ferrucci J, Jr, Simeone J, van Sonnenberg E, Hall A, Wittenberg J. Observations on the distensibility of the common bile duct. Radiology 1982; 142: 467–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor H, Bartlett R, Hamilton I, Ellis W, Walters J, Lintott D, et al. Bile duct calibre-the value of ultrasonic and chol-angiographic measurement in the postcholecystectomy patient. Gut 1984; 25: A576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell T, Geraghty J, Keeling F. Abdominal ultrasonography following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study. Clin Radiol 1993; 47: 111–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huchzermeyer H, Seidenabel K, Eickmeier C, Burgmann W. Zum Problem der Choledochusdilatation bei Gallenblasen-erkrankungen und nach Cholezystektomie. Munch Med Wochenschr 1973; 115: 1831–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keclík M, Huslarová H, Zeman J, Baudis J, Kovárova M, Horácek F. Gibt es eine Choledochuserweiterung nach der Cholezystektomie?. Munch Med Wochenschr 1967; 109: 418–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edmunds R, Katz S, Garciano V, Finby N. The common duct after cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 1971; 103: 79–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mueller P, Ferrucci J, Jr, Simeone J, Wittenberg J, van Sonnenberg E, Polansky A, et al. Postcholecystectomy bile duct dilatation: myth or reality?. Am J R 1981; 136: 355–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooperberg P. High-resolution real-time ultrasound in the evaluation of the normal and obstructed biliary tract. Radiology 1979; 129: 477–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooperberg P, Li D, Wong P, Cohen M, Burhenne H. Accuracy of common hepatic duct size in the evaluation of extrahepatic biliary obstruction. Radiology 1980; 135: 141–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundel H, von Fritsch E, Koch H. Die Bedeutung der endoskopisch-radiologischen Cholangiographie bei Cholestase und Postcholezystektomie-Syndrom. Deutsch Med Wochenschr 1975; 100: 1877–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Longo M, Hodgson J, Ferris D. Size of the common bile duct following cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 1967; 165: 250–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faris I, Thomson J, Grundy D, LeQuesne L. Operative cholangiography: a reappraisal based on a review of 400 cholangio-grams. Br J Surg 1975; 62: 966–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasser R, Silvis S, Vennes J. The normal cholangiogram. Dig Dis 1978; 23: 586–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahour G, Wakim K, Ferris D. The common bile duct in man: its diameter and circumference. Ann Surg 1967; 165: 415–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edholm P, Jonsson G. Bile duct stones related to age and duct width. Acta Chir Scand 1962; 124: 75–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung S, Leung J, Li A. Bile duct size after cholecystectomy: an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic study. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 534–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar