Vasovasostomy and predictors of vasal patency: A systematic review

References

• Vessey M, Lawless M, Yeates D. Efficacy of different contraceptive methods. Lancet 1982;i:841–2.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg ML, Lipshultz LI. Estimating the number of vasectomies performed annually in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth. J Urol 2010;184:2068–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelmann UH, Schramek P, Tomamichel G, Deindl F, Senge T. Vasectomy reversal in central Europe: results of questionnaire of urologists in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. J Urol 1990;143:64–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosher WD. Contraceptive practice in the United States, 1982–1988. Fam Plann Perspect 1990;22:198–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holman CD, Wisniewski ZS, Semmens JB, Rouse IL, Bass AJ. Population-based outcomes after 28,246 in-hospital vasectomies and 1,902 vasovasostomies in Western Australia. BJU Int 2000;86:1043–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard G. Who asks for vasectomy reversal and why? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982;285:490–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Conor VJ. Anastomosis of the vas deferens after purposeful division for sterility. J Urol 1948;59:229–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood S, Montazeri N, Sajjad Y, Troup S, Kingsland CR, Lewis-Jones DI. Current practice in the management of vasectomy reversal and unobstructive azoospermia in Merseyside & North Wales: a questionnaire-based survey. BJU Int 2003;91:839–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman I, Berger RE, Cummings P, Jessen J, Muller CH, Chapman W. Randomized clinical trial of an absorbable stent for vasectomy reversal. J Urol 1997;157:1697–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain DS, Roberts JL, Amling CL. Practice patterns in vasectomy reversal surgery: results of a questionnaire study among practicing urologists. J Urol 2004;171:311–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silber SJ. Microsurgery in clinical urology. Urology 1975;6:150–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fenster H, McLoughlin MG. Vasovasostomy – is the microscope necessary? Urology 1981;18:60–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HY. A 20-year experience with vasovasostomy. J Urol 1986;136:413–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belker AM, Thomas AJ Jr, Fuchs EF, Konnak JW, Sharlip ID. Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group. J Urol 1991;145:505–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopi SS, Townell NH. Vasectomy reversal: is the microscope really essential? Scott Med J 2007;52:18–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh ML, Huang HC, Chen Y, Huang ST, Chang PL. Loupe-assisted vs microsurgical technique for modified one-layer vasovasostomy: is the microsurgery really better? BJU Int 2005;96:864–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jee SH, Hong YK. One-layer vasovasostomy: microsurgical versus loupe assisted. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2308–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silber SJ. Perfect anatomical reconstruction of vas deferens with a new microscopic surgical technique. Fertil Steril 1977;28:72–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silber SJ. Microscopic vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril 1977;28:1191–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuse H, Kimura H, Katayama T. Modified one-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy in vasectomized patients. Int Urol Nephrol 1995;27:451–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer MA, Grantmyre JE. Comparison of modified one- and two-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy. BJU Int 2000;85:1085–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox M. Vasectomy reversal – microsurgery for best results. Br J Urol 1994;73:449–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Witt MA, Heron S, Lipshultz LI. The post-vasectomy length of the testicular vassal remnant: a predictor of surgical outcome in microscopic vasectomy reversal. J Urol 1994;151:892–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandlow JI, Kolettis PN. Vasovasostomy in the convoluted vas deferens: indications and outcomes. J Urol 2005;173:540–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel SR, Sigman M. Comparison of outcomes of vasovasostomy performed in the convoluted and straight vas deferens. J Urol 2008;179:256–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silber SJ. Pregnancy after vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal: a study of factors affecting long-term return of fertility in 282 patients followed for 10 years. Hum Reprod 1989;4:318–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolettis PN, D'Amico AM, Box L, Burns JR. Outcomes for vasovasostomy with bilateral intravasal azoospermia. J Androl 2003;24:22–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sigman M. The relationship between intravasal sperm quality and patency rates after vasovasostomy. J Urol 2004;171:307–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolettis PN, Burns JR, Nangia AK, Sandlow JI. Outcomes for vasovasostomy performed when only sperm parts are present in the vasal fluid. J Androl 2006;27:565–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dohle GR, Smit M. Microsurgical vasovasostomy at the Erasmus MC, 1998–2002: results and predictive factors. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005;149:2743–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kolettis PN, Sabanegh ES, D'Amico AM, Box L, Sebesta M, Burns JR. Outcomes for vasectomy reversal performed after obstructive intervals of at least 10 years. Urology 2002;60:885–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boorjian S, Lipkin M, Goldstein M. The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal. J Urol 2004;171:304–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang G, Walsh TJ, Shefi S, Turek PJ. The kinetics of the return of motile sperm to the ejaculate after vasectomy reversal. Urology 2007;177:2272–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magheli A, Rais-Bahrami S, Kempkensteffen C, Weiske WH, Miller K, Hinz S. Impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on patency and pregnancy after vasectomy reversal. Int J Androl 2010;33:730–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar