422
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Does a surgeon's annual radical prostatectomy volume predict the risk of positive surgical margins and urinary incontinence at one-year follow-up? - Findings from a prospective national study

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 92-100 | Received 20 Apr 2012, Accepted 24 Jun 2012, Published online: 06 Aug 2012

References

  • Steinsvik EA, Axcrona K, Dahl AA, Eri LM, Stensvold A, Fossa SD. Can sexual bother after radical prostatectomy be predicted preoperatively? Findings from a prospective national study of the relation between sexual function, activity and bother. BJU Int 2012;109:1366–74.
  • Barocas DA, Mitchell R, Chang SS, Cookson MS. Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2010;28:243–50.
  • Vesey SG, McCabe JE, Hounsome L, Fowler S. UK radical prostatectomy outcomes and surgeon case volume: based on an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Database. BJU Int 2012;109:346–54.
  • Savage CJ, Vickers AJ. Low annual caseloads of United States surgeons conducting radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2009;182:2677–9.
  • Yossepowitch O, Bjartell A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guillonneau BD, Karakiewicz PI, Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences. Eur Urol 2009;55:87–99.
  • Vrang ML, Røder MA, Vainer B, Christensen IJ, Gruschy L, Brasso K, First Danish single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy: impact of surgical margins on biochemical outcome. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2012;46:172–9.
  • Hong YM, Hu JC, Paciorek AT, Knight SJ, Carroll PR. Impact of radical prostatectomy positive surgical margins on fear of cancer recurrence: results from CaPSURE. Urol Oncol 2010;28:268–73.
  • Williams SB, D'Amico AV, Weinberg AC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, Hu JC. Population-based determinants of radical prostatectomy surgical margin positivity. BJU Int 2011;107:1734–40.
  • Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Riedel E, Begg CB, Wheeler TM, Gerigk C, Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 2003;170:2292–5.
  • Chun FK, Briganti A, Antebi E, Graefen M, Currlin E, Steuber T, Surgical volume is related to the rate of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in European patients. BJU Int 2006;98:1204–9.
  • Wallerstedt A, Carlsson S, Nilsson AE, Johansson E, Nyberg T, Steineck G, Pad use and patient reported bother from urinary leakage after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2012;187:196–200.
  • Hugosson J, Stranne J, Carlsson SV. Radical retropubic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes and side-effects. Acta Oncol 2011;50(Suppl 1):92–7.
  • Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, Kattan MW, Schrag D, Warren JL, Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1138–44.
  • Trinh QD, Sammon J, Jhaveri J, Sun M, Ghani KR, Schmitges J, . Variations in the quality of care at radical prostatectomy. Ther Adv Urol 2012;4:61–75.
  • Hernes E, Kyrdalen A, Kvale R, Hem E, Klepp O, Axcrona K, Initial management of prostate cancer: first year experience with the Norwegian National Prostate Cancer Registry. BJU Int 2010;105:805–11.
  • D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA, Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1998;280:969–74.
  • Bong GW, Ritenour CW, Osunkoya AO, Smith MT, Keane TE. Evaluation of modern pathological criteria for positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens and their use for predicting biochemical recurrence. BJU Int 2009;103:327–31.
  • Ekici S, Ayhan A, Erkan I, Bakkaloglu M, Ozen H. The role of the pathologist in the evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2003;37:387–91.
  • Wei JT, Dunn RL, Litwin MS, Sandler HM, Sanda MG. Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology 2000;56:899–905.
  • Litwin MS, Hays RD, Fink A, Ganz PA, Leake B, Leach GE, Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer2. JAMA 1995;273:129–35.
  • Kyrdalen AE, Dahl AA, Hernes E, Cvancarova M, Fossa SD. Fatigue in hormone-naive prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy or definitive radiotherapy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2010;13:144–50.
  • Lowrance WT, Eastham JA, Savage C, Maschino AC, Laudone VP, Dechet CB, Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologists in the United States. J Urol 2012;187:2087–92.
  • Kang DC, Hardee MJ, Fesperman SF, Stoffs TL, Dahm P. Low quality of evidence for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: results of a systematic review of the published literature. Eur Urol 2010;57:930–7.
  • Bianco FJ Jr, Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Klein EA, Eastham JA, Pontes JE, Variations among experienced surgeons in cancer control after open radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2010;183:977–82.
  • Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Gonen M, Cronin AM, Eastham JA, Schrag D, Effects of pathologic stage on the learning curve for radical prostatectomy: evidence that recurrence in organ-confined cancer is largely related to inadequate surgical technique. Eur Urol 2008;53:960–6.
  • Wilson T, Torrey R. Open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better? Curr Opin Urol 2011;21:200–5.
  • Holmstrom B, Holmberg E, Egevad L, Adolfsson J, Johansson JE, Hugosson J, Outcome of primary versus deferred radical prostatectomy in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden Follow-Up Study. J Urol 2010;184:1322–7.
  • Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, Eastham JA, Schrag D, Klein EA, The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1171–7.
  • Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M, Tuerk I, Koenig P, Martinez-Pineiro L, The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:475–80.
  • Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2003;170:1738–41.
  • Cheng L, Slezak J, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Zincke H, Bostwick DG. Preoperative prediction of surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2862–8.
  • Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Patel VR. Predictive factors for positive surgical margins and their locations after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57:1022–9.
  • Berglund A, Garmo H, Robinson D, Tishelman C, Holmberg L, Bratt O, Differences according to socioeconomic status in the management and mortality in men with high risk prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:75–84.
  • Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, Sandler HM, Northouse L, Hembroff L, Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1250–61.
  • Overgard M, Angelsen A, Lydersen S, Morkved S. Does physiotherapist-guided pelvic floor muscle training reduce urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy? A randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol 2008;54:438–48.
  • Barry MJ, Gallagher PM, Skinner JS, Fowler FJ Jr. Adverse effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy among a nationwide random sample of Medicare-age men. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:513–18.
  • Mottrie A, Gallina A, De Wil P, Thuer D, Novara G, Ficarra V. Balancing continence function and oncological outcomes during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int 2011;108:999–1006.
  • Novara G, Ficarra V, D'elia C, Secco S, Cioffi A, Cavalleri S, Evaluating urinary continence and preoperative predictors of urinary continence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2010;184:1028–33.
  • Touijer K, Kuroiwa K, Vickers A, Reuter VE, Hricak H, Scardino PT, Impact of a multidisciplinary continuous quality improvement program on the positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2006;49:853–8.
  • Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, Sivaraman A, Palmer KJ, Coughlin G, Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2011;59:72–80.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.