Brainstem and Cochlea Potentials Evoked by Rarefaction and Condensation Single-Slope Stimuli A Preliminary Report

References

• Borg E., Löfqvist L. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) to rarefaction and condensation clicks in normal and abnormal ears. Scand Audiol 1982; 11: 227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkard R., Deegan D. Brainstem evoked responses to paired-click stimuli: The use of digital response subtraction. Audiology 1984; 23: 85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coats A. C., Martin J. L. Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses. Arch Otolaryng 1977; 103: 605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats A. C., Martin J. L., Kidder H. R. Normal short-fatency electrophysiological filtered click response from vertex and external auditory meatus. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 65: 747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallos P. Low-frequency auditory characteristics: Species dependence. J Acoust Soc Am 1970; 48: 489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallos P. Electrical correlates of mechanical events in the cochlea. Audiology 1975; 14: 408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallos P., Durrant J. D. On the derivative relationship between stapes movement and cochlear microphonic. J Acoust Soc Am 1972; 52: 1263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont J. J., Spoor A. Cochlear adaptation in guinea pigs. A quantitative description. Audiology 1973; 12: 193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gardi J., Merzenich J. The effect of high-pass noise on the scalp-recorded frequency following response (FFR) in humans and cats. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 65: 1491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerken G. M., Moushegian G., Stillman R. D., Rupert A. L. Human frequency-following responses to monaural and binaural stimuli. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1975; 38: 379
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerull G. Untersuchung akustisch evozierter Hirnstammreaktionen beim Menschen. Freie Universität Berlin. 1977, Doctoral Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Hoke M., Lütkenköner B., Bappert E. Compensation of the transfer-function of electro-medical transducers. Scand Audiol, Suppl. 1980; 11: 1
   Google Scholar
• Kevanishvili Z., Aphonchenko V. Click polarity inversion effects upon the human brainstem auditory evoked potential. Scand Audiol 1981; 10: 141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiang N. Y. S., Watanabe T., Thomas E. C., Clark L. F. Discharge patterns of single fibers in the cats auditory nerve. Research monograph no. 35. M. I. T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1965
   Google Scholar
• Kleberc Y. G., Seifert K. Akustische Kurzzeitreize für die Ableitung von Hirnstammpotentialen durch rechnergesteuerte Systemanalyse. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 1983; 62: 487
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kruidenier C. FFR and BER. Scand Audiol 1979; 179
   Google Scholar
• Kupperman R. Cochlear masking and adaptation. Acta Otol 1971; 71: 232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moushegian R., Rupert A. L., Stillman R. D. Scalp-recorded early responses in man to frequencies in the speech range. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1973; 35: 665
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oelmann J. Microphonic potentials recorded from the ear canal in man evoked by Gaussian-shaped sound pressure impulses. Scand Audiol 1980; 59
   Google Scholar
• Ornitz E. M., Walter D. O. The effect of sound pressure waveform on human auditory evoked responses. Brain Res 1975; 92: 490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peake W. T., Kiang N. Y. Cochlear responses to condensation and rarefaction clicks. Biophys J 1962; 2: 23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhamer H. J., Lindström B., Lundborg T. On the use of click evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. I. The variability of the normal response. Scand Audiol 1978; 7: 193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salomon G., Elberling C. Cochlea nerve potentials recorded from the ear canal in men. Acta Otolaryngol 1971; 71: 319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salt A. N., Thornton A. R. D. The effects of stimulus rise-time and polarity on the auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherg M. Distortion of the middle latency auditory response produced by analog filtering. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1982; 54: 339
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherg M, Speulda E. W. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in the neurological clinic: improved stimulation and analysis methods. Clinical Application of Evoked Potentials in Neurology, F. Mauguiere, M. Revol. Raven Press, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Smith J. C., Marsch J. T., Brown W. S. Far-field recorded frequency following responses, evidence for the locus of brain stem sources. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1975; 39: 465
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spoendlin H. Structural basis of peripheral frequency analysis. Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing, K. Plomp, K. Smorenburg. A. Sijthoff, Leiden 1970
   Google Scholar
• Stockard J. E., Stockard J. J., Westmoreland B. F., Corfits J. L. Brainstem auditory evoked responses. Normal variation as a function of stimulus and subject characteristics. Arch Neurol 1979; 36: 823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teas C. D., Eldredge D. H., Davis H. Cochlear responses to acoustic transients: An interpretation of whole-nerve action potential. J Acoust Soc Am 1962; 34: 1438
   Google Scholar
• Terkildsen K., Osterhammel P., Huis in't Veld F. Electrocochleography with a far field technique. Scand Audiol 1973; 2: 141
   Google Scholar
• Tonndorf J. Cochlear Mechanics and Hydro-dynamics. Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory, J. V. Tobias. Academic Press, New York London 1970; vol. 1: 216
   Google Scholar
• Zwislocki J. J. Phase opposition between inner and outer hair cells and auditory sound analysis. Audiology 1975; 14: 443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar