Signal Detection in Industrial Noise: Effects of Noise Exposure History, Hearing Loss, and the Use of Ear Protection

References

• Abel S. M., Alberti P. W., Riko K. User fitting of hearing protectors: Attenuation results. Personal Hearing Protection in Industry, P. W. Alberti. Raven Press, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Abel S. M., Alberti P. W., Haythornthwaite C., Riko K. Speech intelligibility in noise: Effects of fluency and hearing protector type. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 71: 708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel S. M., Haythornthwaite C. The progression of noise-induced hearing loss: A survey of workers in selected industries in Canada. J Otolaryngol 1983; 13
   Google Scholar
• Abel S. M., Kunov H., Pichora-Fuller M. K., Alberti P. W. The effect of hearing protection on narrowband signal detection in industrial noise. J Otolaryngol 1983; 12: 83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Acton W. I. Problems associated with the use of hearing protection. Ann Occup Hyg 1977; 20: 387
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ANSI STD S3.1. Criteria for permissible ambient noise during audiometric testing. Am Inst Phys., New York 1977
   Google Scholar
• ASA STD 1. Method for the measurement of real ear protection of hearing protectors and physical attenuation of earmuffs. Am Inst Phys. New York 1975
   Google Scholar
• Behar A. Letter to the Editor: Hearing protector attenuation. Sound Vib 1983; 17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger E. H. Earlog no. 1–The threshold shift method of measuring hearing protection. E-A-R Division. Cabot Corporation, Indianapolis, Ind. 1979a
   Google Scholar
• Berger E. H. Earlog no. 3–The effects of hearing protectors on auditory communication. E-A-R Division, Cabot Corporation, Indianapolis, Ind. 1979b
   Google Scholar
• Berger E. H. EARLOG no. 5–Hearing protector performance: How they work and what goes wrong in the real world. E-A-R Division. Cabot Corporation, Indianapolis, Ind. 1980
   Google Scholar
• BS 5108. Method of measurement of the attenuation of hearing protectors at threshold. Brit Stand Inst, London 1974
   Google Scholar
• Chung D. Y., Gannon R. P. The effect of ear protection on word discrimination in subjects with normal hearing and subjects with noise-induced hearing loss. J Amer Aud Soc 1979; 5: 11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coles R. R. A., Rice C. G. Letter to the Editor: Earplugs and impaired hearing. Sound Vib 1965; 3: 521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSA STD Z94.2. Hearing protectors. Canad Stand Assoc, Rexdale, OntarioCanada 1974
   Google Scholar
• Edwards R. G., Hauser W. P., Moiseev N. A., Broderson A. B., Green W. W. Effectiveness of earplugs as worn in the workplace. Sound Vib 1978; 12: 12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forshaw S. E. Listening for machinery malfunctions in noise while wearing earmuffs. Technical Report No. 77X43. Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, Department of National Defence, Downsview, OntarioCanada 1977
   Google Scholar
• Howell K., Martin A. M. An investigation of the effects of hearing protectors on vocal communication in noise. Sound Vib 1975; 41: 181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L. E. A psychophysical evaluation of the dependence of hearing protector attenuation on noise level. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kryter K. D. Effects of ear protective devices on the intelligibility of speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1946; 18: 413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert D. R. Effect of hearing protectors on thresholds of machinery cues in noise (Experiment 1: Naive subjects). Technical paper. Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego, California 1980
   Google Scholar
• Lindeman H. E. Speech intelligibility and the use of hearing protectors. Audiol 1976; 15: 348
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riko K., Alberti P. W. How ear protectors fail: A practical guide. Personal Hearing Protection in Industry, P. W. Alberti. Raven Press, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Rink T. L. Hearing protection and speech discrimination in hearing-impaired persons. Sound Vib 1979; 13: 22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royster L. H., Holder S. R. Personal hearing protection problems associated with the protection phase of the hearing conservation program. Personal Hearing Protection in Industry, P. W. Alberti. Raven Press, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Royster L. H., Royster J. D., Berger E. H. Guidelines for developing an effective hearing conservation program. Sound Vib 1982; 16: 22
   Google Scholar
• Suter A. H. The ability of mildly hearing impaired individuals to discriminate speech in noise. Aeroscope Medical Research Lab., Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 1978
   Google Scholar
• Waugh R. Pure-tone, third-octave, and octave-band attenuation of ear protectors. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 56: 1866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins P. A., Martin A. M. The effect of hearing protectors on the masked threshold of acoustic warning signals. Proc. 9th Internat. Congress on Acoustics. Madrid 1977
   Google Scholar