Effect of Noise on Word Discrimination by Subjects with Impaired Hearing, Compared with Those with Normal Hearing

References

• Aniansson G. Binaural discrimination of “everyday” speech. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1973; 75: 334–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aniansson G. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1974; 1–50, (Suppl 320)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bess F H, Townsend T W. Word discrimination for listeners with flat sensorineural hearing losses. J Speech Hear Dis 1977; 42: 232–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carhart R, Tillman T W, Evanston I. Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses. Arch Otolaryngol 1970; 91: 273–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chermak G D, Dengerink J. Word identification in quiet and in noise. Scand Audiol 1981; 10: 55–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen R L, Keith R W. Use of low-pass noise in word-recognition testing. J Speech Hear Res 1976; 19: 48–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooper J C, Cutts B P. Speech discrimination in noise. J Speech Hear Res 1971; 14: 332–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cremer L, Muller H A. Possibilities for judging the acoustical qualities of auditoriums. Principles and applications of room acoustics. Applied Science Publishers, London and New York 1982; Vol 1: 503–91
   Google Scholar
• Erber N P. Interaction of audition and vision in the recognition of oral speech stimuli. J Speech Hear Res 1969; 12: 423–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erber N P. Auditory and audiovisual reception of words in low frequency noise by children with normal hearing and by children with impaired hearing. J Speech Hear Res 1971; 14: 496–512
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ewertsen H W, Birk Nielsen H, Scott Nielsen S. Audio-visual speech perception. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1970; 229–30, (Suppl 263)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrimond T. Factors influencing auditory perception of pure tones and speech. J Speech Hear Res 1962; 5: 194–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gat I B, Keith R W. An effect of linguistic experience. Audiology 1978; 17: 339–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• vanHeusden E, Plomp R, Pols L CW. Effect of ambient noise on the vocal output and the preferred listening level of conversational speech. Applied Acoustics 1979; 12: 31–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivo J. Influence of the mutual position of speech and noise sources on speech intelligibility in noise. Proc of the 11th ICA, Paris, 1983, 53
   Google Scholar
• Keith R W, Talis H P. The use of speech in noise in diagnostic audiometry. J Aud Res 1970; 10: 201
   Google Scholar
• Keith R W, Talis H P. The effect of white noise on PB scores of normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Audiology 1972; 11: 177–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kryter K D, Williams C, Green D M. Auditory acuity and the perception of speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1962; 34: 1217–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacroix P G, Harris J D. Effects of high-frequency cue reduction on the comprehension of distorted speech. J Speech Hear Dis 1979; 44: 236–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee L A, Chung D Y, Gannon R P. Speech discrimination and effectiveness of hearing aids under listening conditions similar to those of a transit operator. J Otolaryngol 1981; 10: 237–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ludvigsen C. Auditive and audio-visual perception of PB words masked with white noise. Scand Audiol 1973; 2: 107–11
   Google Scholar
• Markides A. Speech levels and speech-to-noise ratios. Br J Audiol 1986; 20: 115–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niemyer W. Speech discrimination in noise-induced deafness. Audiology 1967; 6: 42–7
   Google Scholar
• Olsen W O, Noffsinger D, Kurdziel S. Speech discrimination in quiet and in white noise by patients with peripheral and central lesions. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1975; 80: 375–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neil J J. Contribution of the visual components of oral symbols to speech comprehension. J Speech Hear Dis 1954; 19: 429–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palva T. Finnish speech audiometry. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1952; 1–125, (Suppl 101)
   Google Scholar
• Palva T. Studies of hearing for pure tones and speech in noise. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1955; 45: 231–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross M, Huntington D A, Newby H A, Dixon R F. Speech discrimination of hearing-impaired individuals in noise. J Aud Res 1965; 5: 47–72
   Google Scholar
• Rupp R R, Phillips D. The effect of noise background on speech discrimination function in normal-hearing individuals. J Aud Res 1969; 9: 60–3
   Google Scholar
• Sanders D A, Goodrich S J. The relative contribution of visual and auditory components of speech to speech intelligibility as a function of three conditions of frequency distortion. J Speech Hear Res 1971; 14: 154–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schultz-Coulon H J. Über die Bedeutung des Umweltgeräusches für den Hochtonschwerhörigen. HNO 1973; 21: 26–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sher A, Owens E. Consonant confusions associated with hearing loss above 2000 Hz. J Speech Hear Res 1974; 17: 669–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simonton K M, Hedgecock L D. A laboratory assessment of hearing acuity for voice signals against a background of noise. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1953; 62: 735–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotscheck J. Sprachverständlichkeit bei additiven Störungen. Acustica 1985; 57: 257–67
   Google Scholar
• Stephens S DG. The input for a damaged cochlea a brief review. Brit J Audiol 1976; 10: 97–101
   Google Scholar
• Sumby W H, Pollack I. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1954; 26: 212–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson G, Hoel R. “Flat” sensorineural hearing loss and PB scores. J Speech Hear Dis 1962; 27: 284–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tillman T W, Carhart R, Olsen W O. Hearing aid efficiency in a competing speech situation. J Speech Hear Res 1970; 13: 789–811
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young I, Harbert F. Noise effect on speech discrimination score. J Aud Res 1970; 10: 127–31
   Google Scholar