Auditory Detection, Discrimination and Speech Processing in Ageing, Noise-sensitive and Hearing-impaired Listeners

References

• Abel S M, Alberti P W, Krever E M. Auditory function and speech perception in noise in aging and noise sensitive listeners. Proceedings of 5th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, StockholmSweden, 1988, B Berglund, U Berglund, J Karlsson, T Lindvall. vol. 2: 223–228
   Google Scholar
• Abel S M, Haythornthwaite C A. The progression of noise-induced hearing loss: A survey of workers in selected Canadian industries. J Otolaryngol 1984; 13(Suppl. 13)1–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ANSI. S3.1-1977. Criteria for permissible ambient noise during audiometric testing. American National Standards Institute, New York 1977
   Google Scholar
• Bergman M. Hearing and aging. Audiol 1971; 10: 164–171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman M. Effects of physical aspects of the message. Aging and the perception of speech, M Bergman. Univ. Park Press, Baltimore 1980; 69–105
   Google Scholar
• Bergman M, Blumenfeld M S, Casardo D, Dash M A, Levitt H, Margulies K. Age related decrements in hearing for speech. J Gerontol 1976; 31: 533–538
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bess F H, Townsend T H. Word discrimination for listeners with flat sensorineural hearing losses. J Sp Hear Dis 1977; 42: 232–237
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carney A E, Nelson D A. An analysis of psychopysical tuning curves in normal and pathological ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 268–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung D Y, Mack B. The effect of masking by noise on word discrimination scores in listeners with normal hearing and with noise-induced hearing loss. Scand Audiol 1979; 8: 139–143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooper J C, Cutts B P. Speech discrimination in noise. J Sp Hear Res 1971; 14: 332–337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corso J F. Aging and sex differences in pure tone thresholds. Archiv Otolaryngol 1963; 77: 385–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel W W. Biostatistics: A foundation for analysis in the health sciences, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• Dreschler W A, Plomp R. Relations between psychopysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. II. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 78: 1261–1270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgibbons P J, Wightman F L. Gap detection in normal and hearing impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72: 761–765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florentine M, Buus S, Scharf B, Zwicker E. Frequency selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired observers. J Sp Hear Res 1980; 23: 646–669
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foster J R, Haggard M P. FAAF—An efficient analytical test of speech perception. Proc of Inst. of Acoust., MRC Inst of Hearing Research, NottinghamEngland, 1979, 9–12
   Google Scholar
• Gacek R R, Schukneckt H F. Pathology of presbycusis. Int Audiol 1969; 8: 199–209
   Google Scholar
• Glorig A, Nixon J. Distributions of hearing loss in various populations. Ann Otol Laryngol 1960; 69: 497–516
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green D M, Swets J A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Charles C. Thomas, New York 1966
   Google Scholar
• Harrison R V. The biology of hearing and deafness. Wiley, Springfield 1988
   Google Scholar
• Hinchcliffe R. The threshold of hearing as a function of age. Acoustica 1959; 9: 303–308
   Google Scholar
• Horst J W. Frequency discrimination of complex signals, frequency selectivity and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 874–885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin R J, Hinchcliff L K, Kemp S. Temporal acuity in normal and hearing impaired listeners. Audiol 1981; 20: 234–243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irwin R J, Purdy S C. The minimum detectable duration of auditory signals for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 71: 967–974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handbook of clinical audiology, 3rd edn., J Katz. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1985
   Google Scholar
• Kirikae I, Sato T, Shitara T. Study of hearing in advanced age. Laryngoscope 1964; 74: 205–220
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Konig E. Pitch discrimination and age. Acta Otolaryngol 1957; 8: 475–489
   Google Scholar
• Korsan-Bengtsen M. Distorted speech audiometry. Acta Oto-Laryngol 1973, (Suppl. 310)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruel E J, Bell D W, Lang J S, Schubert E D. A proposed clinical test of speech discrimination. J Sp Hear Res 1968; 11: 536–552
   Google Scholar
• Marshall L. Auditory processing in aging listeners. J Sp Hear Dis 1981; 46: 226–240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Glasberg B R, Roberts B. Refining the measurement of psychological tuning curves. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 76: 1057–1066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson D A, Freyman R L. Psychometric functions for frequency discrimination from listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 799–905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordy J M, Brizzee K R, Beavers T, Medart P. Age differences in the functional and structural organization of the auditory system in man. Sensory systems in the elderly, J M Ordy, K Brizze. Raven, New York 1979; 153–166
   Google Scholar
• Owens E, Schubert E D. Development of the California consonant test. J Sp Hear Res 1977; 20: 463–474
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papsin B C, Abel S M. Temporal summation in hearing-impaired listeners. J Otolaryngol 1988; 17: 93–100
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson R D, Nimmo-Smith I, Weber D L, Milroy R. The detection of hearing with age: Frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72: 1788–1803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritsma R J, Wit H P, van der Lans W P. Relations between hearing loss, maximal word discrimination score and width of psychophysical tuning curves. Psychophysical, physiological and behavioural studies in hearing, G van den Brink, F A Bilsen. Delft Univ Press, The Netherlands 1980; 472–476
   Google Scholar
• Rupp R R, Phillips D. The effect of noise background on speech discrimination function in normal-hearing individuals. J Aud Res 1969; 9: 60–63
   Google Scholar
• Saunders G H, Haggard M P. The clinical assessment of obscure auditory dysfunction. I. Auditory and psychological factors. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 200–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G. Hearing handicap assessment for speech perception using pure tone audiometry. Proceedings of 5th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, StockholmSweden, 1988, B Berglund, U Berglund, J Karlsson, T Lindvall. vol. 2: 65
   Google Scholar
• Spoor A. Presbycusis values in relation to noise induced hearing loss. Int Audiol 1967; 6: 48–57
   Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P G, Jesteadt W, Gorga M P, Mott J. Speech perception ability and psychophysical tuning curves in hearing impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 620–627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter A H. Speech recognition in noise by individuals with mild hearing impairments. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 78: 887–900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson M E, Abel S M. Frequency and duration discrimination by patients with central auditory pathway lesions. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85(Suppl. 1)534
   Google Scholar
• Turner C W, Nelson D A. Frequency discrimination in regions of normal and impaired sensitivity. J Sp Hear Res 1982; 25: 34–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler R S, Summerfield Q, Wood E J, Fernandes M A. Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72: 740–752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wightman F, McGee T, Kramer M. Factors influencing frequency selectivity in normal and hearing-impaired patients. Psychophysics and physiology of hearing, E F Evans, J P Wilson. Academic, London 1977; 295–309
   Google Scholar