55
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Reproducibility of Hearing Threshold Measurements Supplementary Data on Bone-conduction and Speech Audiometry

&
Pages 187-190 | Received 26 Jan 1990, Accepted 26 Feb 1990, Published online: 12 Oct 2009

References

  • Arlinger S D. Comparison of ascending and bracketing methods in pure tone audiometry. A multi-laboratory study. Scand Audiol 1979; 8: 247–51
  • Arlinger S D, Jerlvall L B. Reliability in warble-tone sound field audiometry. Scand Audiol 1987; 16: 21–7
  • Erlandsson B, Håkanson H, Ivarsson A, Nilsson P. Comparison of the hearing threshold measured by manual pure-tone and by self-recording (Békésy) audiometry. Audiology 1979; 18: 414–29
  • Frank T, Klobuka C S, Sotir P J. Air-bone gap distributions in normal-hearing subjects. J Aud Res 1983; 23: 261–9
  • Hagerman B. Reliability in the determination of speech discrimination. Scand Audiol 1976; 5: 219–28
  • Hagerman B. Reliability in the determination of speech reception threshold (SRT). Scand Audiol 1979; 8: 195–202
  • Hagerman B. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry. Doctoral thesis. Scand Audiol 1984; 1–25, (Suppl 21)
  • Hood J D. Clinical implications in calibration requirements in bone conduction standardisation. Audiology 1979; 18: 36–42
  • Acoustics. Standard reference zero for the calibration of pure tone air conduction audiometers. Addendum 1-1983. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaSwitzerland 1985, ISO 389
  • Acoustics. Standard reference zero for the calibration of pure-tone conduction audiometers. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaSwitzerland 1987, ISO 7566
  • Acoustics. Audiometric test methods, Part 1: Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva 1989, ISO 8253-1
  • Jerlvall L, Arlinger S. A comparison of 2-dB and 5-dB step size in pure-tone audiometry. Scand Audiol 1986; 15: 51–6
  • Jerlvall L, Dryselius H, Arlinger S. Comparison of manual and computer-controlled audiometry using identical procedures. Scand Audiol 1983; 12: 209–13
  • Laukli E, Mair I WS. High-frequency audiometry. Normative studies and preliminary experiences. Scand Audiol 1985; 14: 151–8
  • Lutman M E, Cane M A, Smith P A. Comparison of manual and computer-controlled self-recorded audiometric methods for serial monitoring of hearing. Br J Audiol 1989; 23: 305–15
  • Mair I WS, Fjermedal O, Laukli E. Hearing assessment after middle ear surgery. Cholesteatoma and Mastoid Surgery, M Tos, J Thomsen, E Peitersen. Kugler & Ghedini Publ., Amsterdam 1989; 1225–6
  • Marshall L, Hanna T E. Evaluation of stopping rules for audiological ascending test procedures using computer simulations. J Speech Hear Res 1989; 32: 265–73
  • Økstad S, Laukli E, Mair I WS. High-frequency audiometry: Comparison of electric bone-conduction and air-conduction thresholds. Audiology 1988; 27: 17–26

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.