High-Frequency Audiometry Response Characteristics of the KH70 Vibrator

References

• Bell I., Goodsell S, Thornton A RD. A brief communication on bone conduction artefacts. Br J Audiol 1980; 14: 73–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brinkmann K, Richter U. Schalldämmung und Ohrver-schluss-Effekt. Acustica 1980; 47: 53–4
   Google Scholar
• Chandler J R. Partial occlusion of the external auditory meatus: its effect upon air and bone conduction hearing acuity. Laryngoscope 1964; 74: 22–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dieroff H G. Behaviour of high-frequency hearing in noise. Audiology 1982; 21: 83–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doménech J, Carulla M. High-frequency audiometric changes after stapedectomy. Scand Audiol 1988; 17(Suppl. 30)233–5
   Google Scholar
• Dreschler W A, Hulst R JAM, Tange R A, Urbanus N AM. The role of high-frequency audiometry in early detection of ototoxicity. Audiology 1985; 24: 387–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elperer B S, Naunton R F. The stability of the occlusion effect. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1963; 77: 376–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fausti S A, Frey R H, Erickson D A, Rappaport B Z, Cleary E J. A system for evaluating auditory function from 8000-20,000 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 66: 1713–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fausti S A, Rappaport B Z, Schechter M A, Frey R H, Ward T T, Brummett R E. Detection of aminoglycoside ototoxicity by high-frequency auditory evaluation: selected case studies. Am J Otolaryngol 1984; 5: 177–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flottorp G. Effects of noise upon the upper frequency limit of hearing. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1973; 75: 329–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flottorp G. Some pitfalls in the evaluation of auditory function after surgical procedures. Audiology 1982; 21: 15–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frank T, Ragland A E. Repeatability of high-frequency bone conduction thresholds. Ear Hear 1987; 8: 343–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen J J. The value of the Weber test. International symposium on otosclerosis, H F Schuknecht. Little Brown, Boston 1962
   Google Scholar
• Hegewald M, Heitman R, Wiederhold M L, Cooper J C, Gates G A. High-frequency electrostimulation hearing after mastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 100: 49–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC 645. Audiometers. IEC, Geneva 1979
   Google Scholar
• Acoustics—Standard reference zero for the calibration of pure-tone bone-conduction audiometers. ISO, Geneva 1987, ISO 7566
   Google Scholar
• Acoustics—Basic pure-tone audiometric test methods. ISO, Geneva 1989, ISO 8253-1
   Google Scholar
• Kelley N H, Reger S N. The effect of binaural occlusion of the external auditory meati on the sensitivity of the normal ear for bone-conducted sound. J Exp Psychol 1937; 21: 211–7
   Google Scholar
• Laukli E, Mair I WS. High-frequency audiometry. Normative studies and preliminary experiences. Scand Audiol 1985; 14: 151–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightfoot G R. Air-borne radiation from bone conduction transducers. Br. J Audiol 1979; 13: 53–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mair I WS, Laukli E. Air conduction thresholds after myringoplasty and stapes surgery: a conventional and high frequency audiometric comparison. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986; 95: 327–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair I WS, Pedersen S, Laukli E. Audiometric results of TORP and PORP middle ear reconstruction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98: 429–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhammel D, Osterhammel P. High-frequency audiometry. Age and sex variations. Scand Audiol 1979; 8: 73–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richter U, Brinkmann K. Messungen an einem “künstlichen”. PTB-Bericht, Mastoid 1977, AK-10
   Google Scholar
• Richter U, Brinkmann K. Threshold of hearing by bone conduction. A contribution to international standardization. Scand Audiol 1981; 10: 235–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter U, Frank T. Calibration of bone vibrators at high frequencies. Audiol Acoust 1985; 24: 52–62
   Google Scholar
• Rosen S, Plester D, El-Mofty A, Rosen H V. High frequency audiometry in presbycusis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1964; 79: 18–32
   Google Scholar
• Sommer H C, von Gierke H E. Hearing sensations in electric fields. Aerospace Med 1964; 35: 834–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P G, Beauchaine K A, Kalberer A, Kelly W J, Jesteadt W. High-frequency audiometry: test reliability and procedural considerations. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 879–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tange R A, Dreschler W A. Pre- and postoperative high-frequency audiometry in otosclerosis. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1990; 52: 16–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton A RD, Bell I E, Phillipps J J. High-frequency monitoring using an electrostimulation audiometer. Br J Audiol 1989; 23: 63–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tonndorf J. Bone conduction. Handbook of sensory physiology, W D Keidel, W D Neff. Springer, New York 1976; vol. V/3: 37–84
   Google Scholar
• Tonndorf J, Kurman B. High frequency audiometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1984; 93: 576–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Økstad S, Laukli E, Mair I WS. High-frequency audiometry: comparison of electric bone-conduction and air-conduction thresholds. Audiology 1988; 27: 17–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar