11
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Influence of Context on Speech Understanding Ability Using German Sentence Test Materials

&
Pages 251-255 | Received 07 Sep 1992, Accepted 31 Oct 1992, Published online: 12 Oct 2009

References

  • Bilger RC, Nuetzel JM, Rabinowitz WM, Rzcczkowski C. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27: 32–48
  • Bocca E, Calcaro C, Cassinari V, Migliavacca F. Testing “cortical” hearing in temporal lobe tumours. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1955; 45: 289–304
  • Boothroyd A. Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 101–14
  • Comité Consultative International Téléphonique et Télégraphique (CCITT). Vollversammlung Genf 1980; Band III.2: G.227
  • Döring WH. Eigenschaften verschiedener sprachsimulic-render Störschalle. DAGA, Fortschr Akustik 1986; 493–6
  • Giolas TG, Cooker JR, Duffy JR. The predictability of words in sentences. J Audit Res 1970; 10: 328–34
  • Ingold L, Tschopp K. Ein Vorschlag zur Eichung und Wahl von Störgeräuschen in der Sprachaudiometric. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 1992; 71: 315–8
  • Kalikow DN, Stevens KN, Elliott LL. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am 1977; 61: 1337–51
  • Korsan-Bengsten M. Evaluation of distorted speech tests in patients with intra-cranial lesions. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1973; 42–58
  • Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49: 467–77
  • MacLeod A, Summerfield Q. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: Rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 29–43
  • Miller GA, Heise GA, Lichten W. The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. J Exp Psychol 1951; 41: 329–35
  • Plomp R, Mimpen AM. Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 66: 1333–42
  • Taylor WL. Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readibility. Journalism Q 1953; 30: 415–33
  • Theodoridis GC, Schoeny ZG. Comparison of various modes of presenting sentence materials in tests of speech perception in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 2270–2
  • Tschopp K, Ingold L. Die Erratbarkeit von Schlusswörtern in Sätzen. Sprache-Stimme-Gehör 1992a; 16: 82–5
  • Tschopp K, Ingold L. Die Entwicklung einer deutschen Version des SPIN-Tests (Speech Perception in Noise). Moderne Verfahren der Sprachaudiometrie, B. Kollmeier. Median-Verlag, Heidelberg 1992b; 311–29
  • Wedel H v. Diskriminationsverhalten von Normal-und Schwerhörigen bei kritisehem Signalrausehabstand. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 1977; 56: 180–6

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.