References
- Bandaranayake RC. Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide no. 37. Med Teach 2008; 30: 836–845
- Clauser BE, Harik P, Margolis MJ, McManus IC, Mollon J, Chis L, Williams S. An empirical examination of the impact of group discussion and examinee performance information on judgments made in the Angoff standard-setting procedure. Appl Meas Educ 2009b; 22: 1–21
- Clauser BE, Harik P, Mee J, Baldwin SG, Margolis MJ, Dillon GF. Judges' use of examinee performance data in an Angoff standard-setting exercise for a medical licensing examination: An experimental study. J Educ Meas 2009a; 46: 390–407
- De Champlain AF. Ensuring that the competent are truly competent: An overview of common methods and procedures used to set standards on high-stakes examinations. J Vet Med Educ 2004; 31: 62–66
- Impara JC, Plake BS. Teachers' ability to estimate item difficulty: A test of the assumptions of the Angoff standard setting method. J Educ Meas 1998; 35: 69–81
- Kane M, Crooks T, Cohen A. Validating measures of performance. Educ Meas: Issues Pract 1999; 18: 5–17
- Kim SC, Wilson M. A comparative analysis of the ratings in performance assessment using generalizability theory and the many-facet Rasch model. J Appl Meas 2009; 10: 408–423
- Luecht RM. Designing tests for pass-fail decisions using item response theory. Handbook of test development, SM Downing, TM Haladyna. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahway 2006; 575–596
- Mislevy RJ. Linking educational assessments: Concepts, issues, methods, and prospects. Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service, Princeton (NJ) 1992
- Tamblyn R, Abrahamowicz M, Brailovsky C, Grand'Maison P, Lescop J, Norcini J, Girard N, Haggerty J. Association between licensing examination scores and resource use and quality of care in primary care practice. JAMA 1998; 280: 989–996
- Tamblyn R, Abrahamowicz M, Dauphinee WD, Hanley JA, Norcini J, Girard N, Grand'Maison P, Brailovsky C. Association between licensure examination scores and practice in primary care. JAMA 2002; 288: 3019–3026
- van der Linden WJ. A comparison of item selection for adaptive tests with content constraints. J Educ Meas 2005; 42: 283–302
- Wenghofer E, Klass D, Abrahamowicz M, Dauphinee D, Jacques A, Smee S, Blackmore D, Winslade N, Reidel K, Bartman I, et al. Doctor scores on National qualifying examinations predict quality of care in future practice. Med Educ 2009; 43: 1166–1173