400
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Collaboration across the pond: The multi-school progress testing project

, PhD, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 480-485 | Published online: 01 Jun 2010

References

  • Albano MG, Cavallo F, Hoogenboom R, Magni F, Majoor G, Manenti F, Schuwirth L, Stiegler I, van der Vleuten C. An international comparison of knowledge levels of medical students: The Maastricht progress test. Med Educ 1996; 30(4)239–245
  • Arnold L, Willoughby TL. The quarterly profile examination. Acad Med 1990; 65(8)515–516
  • Blake JM, Norman GR, Keane DR, Mueller CB, Cunnington J, Didyk N. Introducing progress testing in McMaster University's problem-based medical curriculum: Psychometric properties and effects on learning. Acad Med 1996; 71(9)1002–1007
  • Case SM, Swanson DB. Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences3rd. National Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia 2002
  • Cronbach LJ, Linn RL, Brennan RL, Haertel EH. Generalizability analysis for performance assessments of student achievement or school effectiveness. Educ Psychol Meas 1997; 57(3)373–399
  • Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) and National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) 2009. 2010 Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) Content Description and General Information. FSMB and NBME
  • Föller T, Brauns K, Fuhrmann S, Hanfler S, Hoffmann J, Kölbel S, Mertens A, Müller B, Nouns Z, Wieland D, . Five years of progress testing at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany. 11th International Ottawa Conference on medical education, MB Maldonado, et al, BarcelonaSpain July 6–8, 2004; 192
  • Langer MM, Swanson DB. Practical considerations in equating progress tests. Med Teach 2010; 32(6)509–512
  • Muijtjens AMM, Schuwirth LWT, Cohen-Schotanus J, Thoben AJNM, van der Vleuten CPM. Benchmarking by cross-institutional comparison of student achievement in a progress test. Med Educ 2008; 42: 82–88
  • Muijtjens AMM, van Mameren H, Hoogenboom RJI, Evers JLH, van der Vleuten CPM. The effect of a “don’t know” option on test scores: Number-right and formula scoring compared. Med Educ 1999; 33: 267–275
  • Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM. Different written assessment methods: What can be said about their strengths and weaknesses?. Med Educ 2004; 38: 974–979
  • Swanson DB, Case SM, van der Vleuten CPM. Strategies for student assessment. The challenge of problem-based learning, D Boud, G Feletti. Kogan Page Ltd, London 1997; 269–282
  • van der Linden WJ. Linear models for optimal test design. Springer+Business Media, Inc, New York 2005
  • van der Vleuten CPM, Verwijnen GM, Wijnen WHFW. Fifteen years of experience with progress testing in a problem-based learning curriculum. Med Teach 1996; 18(2)103–109
  • Verhoeven BH, Snellen-Balendong HA, Hay IT, Boon JM, van der Linde MJ, Blitz-Lindeque JJ, Hoogenboom RJ, Verwijnen GM, Wijnen WH, Scherpbier AJ, et al. The versatility of progress testing assessed in an international context: A start for benchmarking global standardization?. Med Teach 2005; 27(6)514–520

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.