Students’ views on the impact of peer physical examination and palpation as a pedagogic tool for teaching and learning living human anatomy

References

• Chang EH, Power DV. Are medical students comfortable carrying out peer examinations on each other?. Acad Med 2000; 75: 384–389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangerfield P, Bradley P, Gibbs T. Learning gross anatomy in a clinical skills course. Clin Anat 2000; 13: 444–447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Barros N, Rodrigues CJ, Rodrigues AJ, de Negri Cermano MA, Cerri GG. The value of teaching sectional anatomy to improve CT scan interpretation. Clin Anat 2001; 14: 36–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diemers AD, Dolmans DHJM, Van Santen M, Van Luijk SJ, Janssen-Noordman AMB, Scherpbier AJJA. Students’ perceptions of early patient encounters in a PBL curriculum: A first evaluation of the Maastricht experience. Med Teach 2007; 29: 135–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dornan T, Bundy C. What can experience add to early medical education? Consensus survey. BMJ 2004; 329: 834–837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer GS, Thorndike ME. Quidne morui vivos docent? The evolving purpose of human dissection in medical education. Acad Med 2000; 75: 969–979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald JEF, White MJ, Tang SW, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, James DK. Are we teaching sufficient anatomy at medical school: The opinion of newly qualified doctors. Clin Anat 2008; 21: 718–724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick CM, Kolesari GL, Brasel KJ. Teaching anatomy with surgeons’ tools: Use of the laparoscope in clinical anatomy. Clin Anat 2001; 14: 349–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Medical Council. Tomorrow's doctors. GMC, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Gogalniceanu P, Fitzgerald O’Connor E, Raftery AT. Undergraduate anatomy teaching in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2009; 91(Suppl)102–106
   Google Scholar
• Goldie J, Dowie A, Cotton P, Morrison J. Teaching professionalism in the early years of a medical curriculum: A qualitative study. Med Educ 2007; 41: 610–617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas J, Shaffir H. Taking on the role of doctor. A dramaturgical analysis of professionalism. Symbolic Interact 1982; 5: 187–203
   Google Scholar
• Johnson JH. Importance of dissection in learning anatomy: Personal dissection versus peer teaching. Clin Anat 2002; 15: 38–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones R, Higgs R, de Angelis C, Prideaux D. Changing face of medical curricula. Lancet 2001; 357(9257)699–703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlewood S, Ypinazar V, Margolis SA, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, Dornan T. Early practical experience and the social responsiveness of clinical education: Systematic review. BMJ 2005; 331: 387–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan JC, Bligh J, Bradley P, Searle J. Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Med Educ 2004; 38: 418–424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan JC, Regan de Bere S. How we teach anatomy without cadavers. Clin Teach 2004; 1(2)49–52
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf NF, Prentice ED, Metcalf WK, Stinson WW. Peer group models in examination instruction as an integral part of medical gross anatomy. J Med Educ 1982; 57: 641–644
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller SA, Perrotti W, Silverthorn DU, Dalley AF, Rarey KE. From college to clinic: Reasoning over memorisation is key for understanding anatomy. Anat Rec 2002; 269(2)69–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moxham BJ, Plaisant O. Perception of medical students towards the clinical relevance of anatomy. Clin Anat 2007; 20: 560–564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudd J, Siegel R. Sexuality – The experiences and anxieties of medical students. N Engl J Med 1969; 281: 1397–1403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestel D, Tierney T. Role-play for medical students learning about communication: Guidelines for maximising benefits. BMC Med Educ 2007; 7: 3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Older J. Anatomy: A must for teaching the next generation. Surg J R Coll Surg Edinb Irel 2004; 2: 79–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill PA, Larcombe C, Duffy K, Dorman TL. Medical students’ willingness and reactions to learning basic skills through examining fellow students. Med Teach 1998; 20: 433–437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Op Den Akker JW, Bohnen A, Oudegeest WJ, Hillen B. Giving colour to a new curriculum: Bodypaint as a tool in medical education. Clin Anat 2002; 15: 356–362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabst R, Rothkotter HJ. Retrospective evaluation of undergraduate medical education by doctors at the end of their residency time in hospitals: Consequences for the anatomical curriculum. Anat Rec 1997; 249: 431–434
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patel KM, Moxham BJ. Attitudes of professional anatomists to curricular change. Clin Anat 2006; 19: 132–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel KM, Moxham BJ. The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by professional anatomists. Clin Anat 2008; 21: 182–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persuad TVN. The early history of human anatomy: From antiquity to the beginning of the modern era. Thomas Books, Springfield, IL 1984
   Google Scholar
• Prideaux D, Bligh J. Research in medical education: Asking the right questions. Med Educ 2002; 36: 1114–1115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe C, Lester H. Perceived stress during undergraduate medical training: A qualitative study. Med Educ 2003; 37: 32–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raftery AT. Anatomy teaching in the UK. Surgery 2006; 25: 1–2
   Google Scholar
• Rees CE, Bradley P, McLachlan JC. Exploring medical students’ attitudes towards peer physical examination. Med Teach 2004; 26(1)86–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees CE, Bradley P, Collett T, McLachlan JC. Over my dead body? The influence of demographics on students’ willingness to participate in peer physical examination. Med Teach 2005; 27(7)599–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reidenberg JS, Laitman JT. The new face of gross anatomy. Anat Rec 2002; 269: 81–88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richardson R. Death, dissection and the destitute. Penguin, London 1988
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. Analysing qualitative data, A Bryman, RG Burgess. Routledge, London 1994; 173–194
   Google Scholar
• Smith III AC, Kleinman S. Managing emotions in medical school: Students’ contacts with the living and the dead. Soc Psychol Q 1989; 52(1)56–69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithson S, Hart J, Wass V. Students’ hopes and fears about early patient contact: Lessons to be learned about preparing and supporting students during the first year. Med Teach 2010; 32: e24–e30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towle A. Critical thinking: The future of undergraduate medical education. King's Fund Centre, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• Wearn AM, Rees CE, Bradley P, Vnuk AK. Understanding student concerns about peer physical examination using an activity theory framework. Med Educ 2008; 42: 1218–1226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar