References
- Clariana R, Wallace P. Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Key factors associated with the test mode. Br J Educ Technol 2002; 33: 593–602
- De Angelis S. Equivalency of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing. J Allied Health 2000; 29: 161–164
- Gwalltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A meta analytic review. Value Health 2008; 11: 322–333
- Lempp H, Seale C. The hidden curriculum in undergraduate medical education: Qualitative study of medical students’ perceptions of teaching. BMJ 2004; 329: 770–773
- Lim ECH, Ong BKC, Wilder-Smith EPV, Seet RCS. Computer based versus pen and paper testing: Students’ perception. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2006; 35: 599–603
- Mason BJ, Patry M, Berstein DJ. An examination of the equivalence between non-adaptive computer based and traditional testing. J Educ Comp Res 2001; 24: 29–39
- Rubenstein K, Patterson J, Johnstone R. Improving criteria and feedback in student assessment in law. Routledge Cavendish, Abingdon, OxfordUK 1998
- Russo A. Mixing technology and testing. School Adm 2002; 59(4)6–12
- Schwartz P. 2009. Ako Aotearoa. [Accessed December 2010] Available from: http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/ako-hub/good-practice-publication-grants-e-book/resources/pages/most-unusual-examination-progress-te.
- Wang S, Jiao H, Young MJ, Brooks TE, Olson J. Comparability of computer-based and paper–and-pencil testing in K-12 reading assessment: A meta-analysis of testing mode effects. Educ Psychol Meas 2008; 68: 5–24