Deliberative curriculum inquiry for integration in an MD curriculum: Dalhousie University's curriculum renewal process

References

• AAMC HHMC, (Association of American Medical Colleges & Howard Hughes Medical Institute). 2009. Scientific Foundations for Future Physicians: Report of the AAMC-HHMI Committee. Washington DC: AAMC. [Accessed 27 July 2011] Available from http://www.hhmi.org/grants/pdf/08-209_AAMC-HHMI_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anderson RS, Speck BW. “Oh what a difference a team makes”: Why team teaching makes a difference. Teach Teach Educ 1998; 14(7)671–686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs J. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. High Educ 1996; 32(3)347–364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case R. 1994. Our crude handling of educational reforms: The case of curricular integration. Canadian J Educ 19(1):80–93.
   Google Scholar
• Collins L, Arenson CA, Jerback C, Dressel R, Kane P, Antony R, Necky J, Oduneye A. Chronic Illness Care Education: Reflections on a Longitudinal Interprofessional Mentorship Experience. Health Policy Newslett 2009; 21(4)3
   Google Scholar
• Davenport NC, Spath ML, Blauvelt MJ. A step-by-step approach to curriculum review. Nurse Educ 2009; 34(4)181–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA 2002; 287(2)226–235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Neville AJ, Norman GR. Exploring the aetiology of content specificity: Factors influencing analogic transfer and problem solving. Acad Med 1998; 73(Suppl.)1–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GMC (General Medical Council). 2009. Tomorrow's Doctors: Outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. London: General Medical Council. [Accessed 27 July 2011] Available from http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/tomorrows_doctors_2009.asp
   Google Scholar
• Harden RM. The integration ladder: A tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Med Educ 2000; 34(7)551–557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden RM. AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: A tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Med Teach 2001; 23(2)123–137
   Google Scholar
• Harris IB. Deliberative Inquiry: The Arts of Planning. Forms of curriculum inquiry, E Short. SUNY Press, New York 1991; 285–308
   Google Scholar
• Harris IB. Perspectives for curriculum renewal in medical education. Acad Med 1993; 68(6)484–486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern DE. Curriculum development in medical education: A six-step approach2nd. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD 2009
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod A. Six ways problem-based learning cases can sabotage patient-centered medical education. Acad Med 2011; 86(7)818–825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller JH, Jain S, Loeser H, Irby DM. Lessons learned about integrating a medical school curriculum: Perceptions of students, faculty and curriculum leaders. Med Educ 2008; 42(8)778–785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata R. What does team teaching mean? A case study of interdisciplinary teaming. J Educ Res 2002; 96(2)67–77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oblinger DG, Barone CA, Hawkins BL. Distributed education and its challenges: An overview. American Council on Education and EDUCAUSE., Washington, DC 2001, [Accessed 20 September 2011] Available from http://www.acenet.edu/bookstore/pdf/distributed-learning/distributed-learning-01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Prideaux D. Curriculum design. BMJ 2003; 326: 268–270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RCPSC (Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada). 2005. The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework: Better standards, better physicians, better care. Frank JR, editor. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. [Accessed 27 July 2011] Available from http://rcpsc.medical.org/canmeds/CanMEDS2005/CanMEDS2005_e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reid WA. 1978. Thinking about the curriculum: The nature and treatment of curriculum problems. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. p84.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan M, Wilkes M, Stevenson F, Nguyen T, Slavin S. Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: Effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions. Acad Med 2007; 82(1)74–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Cate O, Scheele F. Competency-based postgraduate training: Can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice?. Acad Med 2007; 82(6)542–547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Cate O, Snell L, Carraccio C. Medical competence: The interplay between individual ability and the health care environment. Med Teach 2010; 32(8)669–675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger MS, Hornyak MJ. Team teaching for higher level learning: A framework of professional collaboration. J Manage Educ 1999; 23(3)311
   Google Scholar
• Wiener CM, Thomas PA, Goodspeed E, Valle D, Nichols DG. “Genes to Society”—The logic and process of the new curriculum for the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Acad Med 2010; 85: 498–506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins GP, McTighe J. Understanding by Design. Merrill/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 2001
   Google Scholar
• Willett TG. Current status of curriculum mapping in Canada and the UK. Med Educ 2008; 42(8)786–793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar