References
- Atlas ti (n.d.). Atlas ti: Qualitative data analysis (version 7) [computer software]. Available from http://www.atlasti.com/index.html
- Bradley P, Cooper S, Duncan F. A mixed-methods study of interprofessional learning and resuscitation skills. Med Educ 2009; 43: 912–922
- Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG. Description, justification and clarification: A framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ 2008; 42: 128–133
- Cote L, Turgeon J. Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education. Med Teach 2005; 27: 71–75
- Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2011
- Dalkin SM, Jones D, Lhussier M, Cunningham B. Understanding integrated care pathways in palliative care using realist evaluation: A mixed methods study protocol. BMJ Open 2012; 2: 1–6
- Doyle L, Brady AM, Byrne G. An overview of mixed methods research. J Res Nurs 2009; 14(2)175–185
- Gremler DD. The critical incident technique in service research. J Serv Res 2004; 7(1)65–89
- Gruppen LD. Improving medical education research. Teach Learn Med 2007; 19: 331–335
- Krain L, Lavelle E. Residents’ perceptions of professionalism. J Grad Med Educ 2009; 1: 221–224
- Lavelle E, Hicks E, Moses A, Mercado C, 2009. Designing a measure of professionalism: The role of resident feedback. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Annual Meeting, Mar 5–8, 2009, Grapevine, TX
- Leech NL, Onwuegbuzie AJ. A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual Quant 2009; 43: 265–275
- MAXQDA. 1989. MAXQDA: The art of text analysis [computer software]. Available from http://www.maxqda.com/ [Accessed 10 January 2013]
- Meyers LS, Gamst GC, Guarino AJ. Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2005
- Moore HK, McKeithen TM, Holthusen AE. A mixed-methods, multiprofessional approach to needs assessment for designing education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2011; 31(3)220–221
- Murdoch-Eaton D, Drewery S, Elton S, Emmerson C, Marshall M, Smith JA, Stark P, Whittle S. What do medical students understand by research and research skills? Identifying research opportunities within undergraduate projects. Med Teach 2010; 32: e152–e160
- Nofziger AC, Haumburg EH, Davis BJ, Mooney CJ, Epstein RM. Impact of peer assessment on the professional development of medical students: A qualitative study. Acad Med 2010; 85(1)140–147
- Norcini J, McKinley K. Assessment methods in medical education. Teach Teach Educ 2007; 23: 239–250
- Nvivo (n.d.). Nvivo: QSR International (version 10) [computer software]. Available from http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_previous-products_nvivo8.asx [Accessed 10 January 2013]
- Reeves S, Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Barr H, Freeth D, Koppel I, Hammick M. The effectiveness of interprofessional education: Key findings from a new systematic review. J Interprof Care 2010; 24: 230–241
- Regehr G. It's not rocket science: Rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Med Educ 2010; 44: 31–39
- Schifferdecker KE, Reed VA. Using mixed methods research in medical education: Basic guidelines for researchers. Med Educ 2009; 43: 637–644
- Sheskin D. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures5th. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 2011
- Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2003
- Teddlie C, Yu F. Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. J Mix Methods Res 2007; 1(1)77–100
- Tian J, Atkinson NL, Portnoy B, Lowitt NR. The development of a theory-based instrument to evaluate the effectiveness of continuing medical education. Acad Med 2010; 85(9)1518–1525