References
- Altahawi F, Sisk B, Poloskey S, Hicks C, Dannefer EF. Student perspectives on assessment: Experience in a competency-based portfolio system. Med Teach 2012; 34: 221–225
- Bierer SB, Dannefer ED. Does students’ gender, citizenship, or verbal ability affect fairness of portfolio-based promotion decisions? Results from one medical school. Acad Med 2011; 86: 772–777
- Bierer SB, Dannefer ED, Taylor C, Hall P, Hull AL. Methods to assess student's acquisition, application, and integration of basic science knowledge in an innovative competency-based curriculum. Med Teach 2008; 30: e171–177
- Dannefer EF, Bierer SB, Gladding SP. Evidence within a portfolio-based assessment program: What do medical students select to document their performance?. Med Teach 2012; 34: 215–220
- Dannefer EF, Henson LC. The portfolio approach to competency-based assessment at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine. Acad Med 2007; 82: 493–502
- Dijkstra J, Van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW. A new framework for designing programmes of assessment. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2010; 15: 379–393
- Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CP. Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach 2011; 33: 478–485
- Van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen E, Dijkstra J, Tigelaar D, Baartman LKJ, van Tartwijk J. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach 2012; 34: 205–213