Research methodology workshops evaluation using the Kirkpatrick’s model: Translating theory into practice

References

• Ajuwon AJ, Kass N. 2008. Outcome of research ethics training workshop among clinicians and science Nigeria University. BMC Med Ethics 9(1):1–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al-Shehri AM. 2012. Quality management and medical education in Saudi Arabia. Chap 5. In: Quality Management and Practice, Ng K-S (Ed.). InTech: Rijeka, Croatia. pp. 67–86
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin T, Ford J. 1988. Transfer of training: A review and directions of future research. Pers Psychol 41(1):63–105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates I, Akoto AYO, Ansong D, Karikari P, Bedu-Addo G, Critchley J, Agbenyega T, Nsiah-Asare A. 2006. Evaluating health research capacity building: An evidence based tool. PLoS Med 3(8):1224–1229
   Google Scholar
• Bates I, Ansong D, Bedu-Addo G, Agbenyega T, Akoto AYO, Hsiah-Asare A, Karikari P. 2007. Evaluation of a learner design course for teaching health research skills in Ghana. BMC Med Edu 7(18):1–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bates R. 2004. A critical analysis of evaluation practice: The Kirkpatrick model, and the principle of beneficence. Eval Program Plann 27: 341–347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durning SJ, Hemmer P, Pangaro LN. 2007. The structure of program evaluation: An approach for evaluating a course, clerkship or components of a residency or fellowship training program. Teach Learn Med 19(3):308–318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers UD, Schneckenberg D. 2010. Changing cultures in higher education: Moving ahead to future learning. Heidelberg, New York: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Elonen S, Artto KA. 2003. Problems in managing internal development projects in multi-project environments. Int J Proj Manag 21(6):395–402
   Google Scholar
• Engestrom Y. 2001. Expansive learning at work: Towards an activity theoretical reconceptualization. J Edu Work 14(1):133–156
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick JL, Sanders JR, Worthen BR. 2004. Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
   Google Scholar
• Fuller A, Hodkinson H, Hodkinson P, Unwin L. 2005. Learning as peripheral participation in communities of practice: A reassessment of key concepts in workplace learning. Br Educ Res J 31(1):49–68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi P. 2011. Clinical research methodology. Indian J Phar Edu Res 45(2):199–209
   Google Scholar
• Harden A, Peersman G, Oliver S, Mauthner M, Oakley A. 1999. A systematic review of the effectiveness of health promotion interventions in the workplace. Occup Med 49 (8):540–548
   Google Scholar
• Heising W. 2012. The integration of ideation and project portfolio management: A key factor for sustainable success. Int J Proj Manag 30(5):582–595
   Google Scholar
• Johal S. 2012. Assessing the impact of workshops promoting concepts of psychosocial support for emergency events. PloS Curr 4: e4
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. 2005. The transfer of learning to behavior: Using the four levels to improve performance. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publication
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. 2006. Evaluating training programs: The four levels. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publication
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. 2007. Implementing the four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publication
   Google Scholar
• Knowles MS, Holton EF, Swanson RA. 1998. The adult learner. 5th ed. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company
   Google Scholar
• Kothari CR. 2004. Research methodology: Methods and techniques. 2nd ed. New Delhi, India: New Age International Publication
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence BS. 2011. Careers, social context and interdisciplinary thinking. Hum Relat 64(1):59–84
   Google Scholar
• Malki AA, Al-Bareeq JM, Al-Halili. 2003. Evaluation of research writing workshop. Bahrain Med Bull 25(3):1–8
   Google Scholar
• Mensik JS. 2011. Understanding research and evidence-based practice: From knowledge generation to translation. J Infus Nurs 34(3):174–178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan R, and Casper W. 2000. Examining the factor structure of participant reactions to training: A multidimensional approach. Hum Resour Dev 3: 301–317
   Google Scholar
• Morrison J. 2003. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Evaluation. Br Med J 326: 385–387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musal B, Taskiran C, Gursel Y, Ozan S, Timbil S, Velipasaoglu S. 2008. An example of program evaluation project in undergraduate medical education. Edu Health 21(1):1–7
   Google Scholar
• Nestel D, Taylor S, Spender Q. 2004. Evaluation of an inter-professional workshop to develop a psychosocial assessment and child-centered communication training programme for pediatricians in training. BMC Med Edu 4(25):1–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polgar ST. 2008. Introduction to research in the health sciences. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone
   Google Scholar
• Prideaux D, Bligh J. 2002. Research in medical education: Asking the right questions. Med Edu 36: 1114–1115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse DN. 2011. Employing Kirkpatrick’s evaluation framework to determine the effectiveness of health information management courses and programs. Perspect Health Inf Manag 8 (Spring): 1c–5c
   Google Scholar
• Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Liden RC. 2001. A social capital theory of career success. Acad Manage J 44(2):219–237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smidt A, Balandin S, Sigafoos J, Reed VA. 2009. The Kirkpatrick model: A useful tool for evaluating training outcomes. J Intellect Dev Disabil 34(3):266–274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spalding B. 1999. How effective is group work in enhancing work based learning: An evaluation of an education studies course. J Further High Edu 23(1):119–125
   Google Scholar
• Staples L. 2004. Roots to Power: A manual for grassroots organization, 2nd ed. Westport: Praeger Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M, Prideaux D. 2006. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach 28(6):497–526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor R, Reeves B, Ewings P, Binns S, Keast J, Mears R. 2000. A systematic review of the effectiveness of critical appraisal skills training for clinicians. Med Edu 34: 120–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar