Understanding, teaching and assessing the elements of the CanMEDS Professional Role: Canadian Program Directors’ views

References

• Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Project Staff. 2000. ACGME Outcome Project. [Accessed 15 March 2011] Available from http://www.acgme.org
   Google Scholar
• Bryden P, Ginsburg S, Kurabi B, Ahmed N. 2010. Professing professionalism: Are we our own worst enemy? Faculty members’ experiences of teaching and evaluating professionalism in medical education at one school. Acad Med 85:1025–1034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou S, Cole G, McLaughlin K, Lockyer J. 2008. CanMEDS evaluation in Canadian postgraduate training programmes: Tools used and programme director satisfaction. Med Educ 42:879–886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell J. 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California: Thousand Oaks
   Google Scholar
• Cruess R, Cruess S, Steinert Y. 2009. Teaching medical professionalism. New York: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Cruess R, McIlroy J, Cruess S, Ginsburg S, Steinert Y. 2006. The professionalism mini-evaluation exercise: A preliminary investigation. Acad Med 81(10):574–578
   Google Scholar
• Dillman D. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley
   Google Scholar
• Eraut M. 2000. Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. Br J Educ Psychol 70(1):113–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank J. 2005. The CanMEDS physician competency framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. [Accessed 13 March 2011] Available from www.royalcollege.ca
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein E, Maestas R, Fryer-Edwards K, Wenrich M, Amies Oelschlager A, Baernstein A, Kimball H. 2006. Professionalism in medical education: An institutional challenge. Acad Med 81(10):871–876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafferty F. 2006. Definitions of professionalism: A search for meaning and identity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 449:193–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafferty F, Franks R. 1994. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Acad Med 69(11):861–871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins R, Katsufrakis P, Holtman MC, Clauser BE. 2009. Assessment of medical professionalism: Who, what, when, where, how, and … why? Med Teach 31:348–361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe A, Barrett A, Leinster S. 2009. How medical students demonstrate their professionalism when reflecting on experience. Med Educ 43:942–951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Lynch DC, Surdyk PM, Eiser AR. 2004. Assessing professionalism: A review of the literature. Med Teach 26:366–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Woodrow S, Reznick R, Beales J, MacRae HM. 2010. Observation, reflection, and reinforcement: Surgery faculty members’ and residents’ perceptions of how they learned professionalism. Acad Med 85:134–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton M. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. In: Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y, editors. Teaching medical professionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp 31–53
   Google Scholar
• RCPSC: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. 2005. The CanMEDS roles framework. [Accessed 21 December 2012] Available from http://www.royalcollege.ca
   Google Scholar
• RCPSC: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. 2009. General standards of accreditation. Ottawa: RCPSC Educational Standards Unit. [Accessed 21 December 2012] Available from http://www.royalcollege.ca
   Google Scholar
• Riley S, Kumar N. 2012. Teaching medical professionalism. Clin Med 12(1):9–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland M, Rao SR, Sibbald B, Hann M, Harrison S, Walter A, Guthrie B, Desroches C, Ferris TG, Campbell EG. 2011. Professional values and reported behaviours of doctors in the USA and UK: Quantitative survey. BMJ Qual Saf 20:515–521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shephard L. 2000. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational researcher 29(7):4–14
   Google Scholar
• Sherbino J, Frank J, Flynn L, Snell L. 2011. “Intrinsic Roles” rather than “armour”: Renaming the “non-medical expert roles” of the CanMEDS framework to match their intent. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 16(5):695–697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell L. 2008. Teaching professionalism and fostering professional values during residency: The McGill experience. In: Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y, editors. Teaching medical professionalism. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp 246–262
   Google Scholar
• Steinert Y. 2008. Educational theory and strategies for teaching and learning professionalism. In: Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y, editors. Teaching medical professionalism. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp 31–53
   Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, Cruess R, Cruess S, Boudreau JD, Fuks A. 2007. Faculty development as an instrument of change: A case study on teaching professionalism. Acad Med 82:1057–1064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Cate O, Scheele F. 2007. Competency-based postgraduate training: Can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Acad Med 82(6):542–547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead C, Martin D, Fernandez N, Younker M, Kouz R, Frank J, Boucher A. 2011. Integration of CanMEDS expectations and outcomes. Members of the FMEC PG consortium. [Accessed 21 December 2012] Available from http://www.afmc.ca
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson T, Wade W, Knock L. 2009. A blueprint to assess professionalism: Results of a systematic review. Acad Med 84:551–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar