1,110
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
How We…

How we give personalised audio feedback after summative OSCEs

, , &

References

  • Brearley FQ, Cullen WR. 2012. Providing students with formative audio feedback. Biosci Educ 20:22–36
  • Cilliers FJ, Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CPM. 2012. A model of the pre-assessment learning effects of assessment is operational in an undergraduate clinical context. BMC Med Educ 12:9
  • Harden RM, Stevenson M, Downie WW, Wilson GM. 1975. Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. Br Med J 1(5955): 447–451
  • Harrison CJ, Könings KD, Molyneux A, Schuwirth L, Wass V, van der Vleuten CPM. 2013. Web-based feedback after summative assessment: How do students engage? Med Educ 47:734–744
  • Hauer KE, Teherani A, Irby DM, Kerr KM, O’Sullivan PS. 2008. Approaches to medical student remediation after a comprehensive clinical skills examination. Med Educ 42:104–112
  • Lefroy J, Gay S, Gibson S, Williams S, McKinley RK. 2011. Development and face validation of an instrument to assess and improve clinical consultation skills. Int J Clin Skills 5:115–125
  • Lunt T, Curran J. 2010. ‘Are you listening please?’ The advantage of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback. Assess Eval Higher Educ 35:759–769
  • Mayer RE, Moreno R. 2002. Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learn Instr 12:107–119
  • Merry S, Orsmond P. 2008. Students’ attitudes to and usage of academic feedback provided via audio files. Biosci Educ J 11. Available from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/subjects/bioscience/bioscience-education-11-3.pdf
  • Patrício MF, Julião M, Fareleira F, Carneiro AV. 2013. Is the OSCE a feasible tool to assess competencies in undergraduate medical education? Med Teach 35:503–514
  • Rudland J, Wilkinson T, Smith-Han K, Thompson-Fawcett M. 2008. “You can do it late at night or in the morning. You can do it at home, I did it with my flatmate.” The educational impact of an OSCE. Med Teach 30:206–211
  • Shute V. 2008. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res 78:153–189
  • Sweller J, van Merrienboer J, Paas F. 1998. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ Psychol Rev 10:251–296
  • Treadwell I. 2006. The usability of personal digital assistants (PDAs) for assessment of practical performance. Med Educ 40:855–861
  • van der Vleuten CPM. 1996. The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ 1:41–67
  • van Hell EA, Kuks JBM, Dekker MJ, Borleffs JCC, Cohen-Schotanus J. 2011. The digital pen as a novel device to facilitate the feedback process. Med Teach 33:497–499
  • Yeates P, O’Neill P, Mann K, Eva K. 2013. Seeing the same thing differently. Adv Health Sci Educ 18:325–341

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.