13,955
Views
261
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
AMEE Guide

The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96

&

References

  • Ambrose SA, Bridges MW, DiPietro M, Lovett MC, Norman MK. 2010. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
  • The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). 2001. Report IV – Contemporary issues in medicine: Basic science and clinical research. Medical School Objectives Project. Washington, DC: AAMC
  • The Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada (AFMC). 2009. The future of medical education in Canada: A collective vision for MD education. Ottawa, ON: AFMC
  • Australian Medical Council Limited. 2012. Standards for assessment and accreditation of primary medical programs by the Australian Medical Council 2012. Kingston, ACT: AMC
  • Bandiera G, Boucher A, Neville A, Kuper A, Hodges B. 2013. Integration and timing of basic and clinical sciences education. Med Teach 35(5):381–387
  • Beane JA. 1977. Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. New York: Teachers College Press
  • Bierer SB, Dannefer EF, Taylor C, Hall P, Hull AL. 2008. Methods to assess students' acquisition, application and integration of basic science knowledge in an innovative competency-based curriculum. Med Teach 30:e171–e177
  • Bierer SB, Taylor CA, Dannefer EF. 2009. Evaluation of essay questions used to assess medical students' application and integration of basic and clinical science knowledge. Teach Learn Med 21(4):344–350
  • Bloom BS, Engelhart MD, Furst EJ, Hill WH, Kratwohl DR. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I, Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman
  • Bowen JL. 2006. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med 355:2217–2225
  • Bruner JS. 1960. The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  • Brunger F, Duke PS. 2012. The evolution of integration: Innovations in clinical skills and ethics in first year medicine. Med Teach 34:e452–e458
  • Cooke M, Irby DM, Sullivan W, Ludmerer KM. 2006. American medical education 100 years after the Flexner report. N Engl J Med 355(13):1339–1344
  • Corbett EC, Whitcomb ME. 2004. The AAMC project on the clinical education of medical students: Clinical skills education. Washington, DC: AAMC
  • D'Antoni AV, Zipp GP, Olson VG. 2009. Inter-rater reliability of the mind map assessment rubric in a cohort of medical students. BMC Med Educ 9:19–26
  • Davis MH, Harden RM. 2003. Planning and implementing an undergraduate medical curriculum: The lessons learned. Med Teach 25(6):596–608
  • Drybye LN, Starr SR, Thompson GB, Lindor KD. 2011. A model for integration of formal knowledge and clinical experience: The Advanced Doctoring course at Mayo Medical School. Acad Med 86(9):1130–1136
  • Dubois EA, Franson KL. 2009. Key steps for integrating a basic science throughout a medical school curriculum using an e-learning approach. Med Teach 31(9):822–828
  • Edmondson KM. 1995. Concept mapping for the development of medical curricula. J Res Sci Teach 32(7):777–793
  • Ellaway R, Graves L, Berry S, Myhre D, Cummings BA, Konkin J. 2013. Twelve tips for designing and running longitudinal integrated clerkships. Med Teach 35:989–995
  • Ferguson KJ, Steiner LA, Kreiter CD, Pomrehn PR. 1997. Assessment of case-based learning within a hybrid curriculum. Presentation at the Association of American Medical Colleges Research in Medical Education Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 4 November 1997
  • Ferguson KJ. 2006. Beyond multiple-choice questions: Using case-based learning patient questions to assess clinical reasoning. Med Educ 40:1142
  • Finnerty EP, Chauvin S, Bonaminio G, Andrews M, Carroll RG, Pangaro LN. 2010. Flexner revisited: The role and value of the basic sciences in medical education. Acad Med 85(2):349–355
  • Flexner A. 1910. Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A report to the Carnegie Foundation for the advancement of teaching. New York: Carnegie Foundation
  • Fostaty-Young S, Wilson RJ. 2000. Assessment and learning: The ICE approach. Winnipeg, MB: Portage and Main
  • General Medical Council (GMC). 1993. Tomorrow's Doctors: Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. London: GMC
  • General Medical Council (GMC). 2009. Tomorrow's Doctors. London: GMC
  • General Medical Council (GMC). 2010. Update: Standards for curricula and assessment systems. London: GMC
  • Goldman E, Schroth WS. 2012. Deconstructing integration: A framework for the rational application of integration as a guiding curricular strategy. Acad Med 87(6):729–734
  • Harden RM. 2000. The integration ladder: A tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Med Educ 34:551–557
  • Harden RM. 2001. Curriculum mapping: A tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. AMEE Guide No. 21. Med Tech 23(2):123–137
  • Harden RM, Sowden S, Dunn WR. 1984. Educational strategies in curriculum development: The SPICES model. Med Educ 18:284–297
  • Harden RM, Davis MH, Crosby JR. 1997. The new Dundee medical curriculum: A whole that is greater than the sum of the parts. Med Educ 31(4):264–271
  • Harden RM, Stamper N. 1999. What is a spiral curriculum? Med Teach 21(2):141–143
  • Hirsh D, Gaufberg E, Ogur B, Cohen P, Krupat E, Cox M, Pelletier S, Bor D. 2012. Educational outcomes of the Harvard Medical School-Cambridge integrated clerkship: A way forward for medical education. Acad Med 87(5):643–650
  • Irby DM, Cooke M, O'Brien BC. 2010. Calls for reform of medical education by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad Med 85(2):220–227
  • Karpicke JD, Blunt JR. 2011. Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science 331:440–448
  • Kaufman DM, Mann KV. 2010. Teaching and learning in medical education: How theory can inform practice. In: Swansick T, editor. Understanding medical education: Evidence, theory and practice. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp 7–30
  • Klement BJ, Paulsen DF, Wineski LE. 2011. Anatomy as the backbone of an integrated first year medical curriculum: Design and implementation. Anat Sci Educ 4(3):157–169
  • Knowles MS. 1980. The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Chicago, IL: Follett
  • Kulasegaram KM, Martimianakis MA, Mylopoulos M, Whitehead CR, Woods NN. 2013. Cognition before curriculum: Rethinking the integration of basic science and clinical learning. Acad Med 88:1–8
  • Kumar S, Dee F, Kumar R, Velan G. 2011. Benefits of testable concept maps for learning about pathogenesis of disease. Teach Learn Med 23:137–143
  • Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME). 2013. Functions and structure of a medical school: Standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the M.D. Degree. Washington, DC: LCME
  • Lindgren S. 2013. For future health – A new medical school (SOU 2013:15). Report of the Medical Education Survey. State Public Inquiries, SOU 2013:15. Stockholm: Swedish Government Publishing Service
  • Lowitt NR. 2002. Assessment of an integrated curriculum in radiology. Acad Med 77(9):933
  • Maeshiro R, Johnson I, Koo D, Parboosingh J, Carney JK, Gesundheit N, Ho ET, Butler-Jones D, Donovan D, Finkelstein JA, et al. 2010. Medical education for a healthier population: Reflections on the Flexner Report from a public health perspective. Acad Med 85(2):211–219
  • Malik AS, Malik RH. 2011. Twelve tips for developing an integrated curriculum. Med Teach 33:99–104
  • McGaghie WC, Boerger RL, McCrimmon DR, Ravitch MM. 1994. Agreement among medical experts about the structure of concepts in pulmonary physiology. Acad Med 69:S78–S80
  • McGaghie WC, McCrimmon DR, Mitchell G, Thompson JA, Ravitch MM. 2000. Quantitative concept mapping in pulmonary physiology: Comparison of student and faculty knowledge structures. Adv Physiol Ed 23:72–81
  • MedU Consortium/International Association of Medical Science Educators Project. 2014. Available from http://www.med-u.org/medu-science
  • Moni RW, Beswick E, Moni KB. 2005. Using student feedback to construct an assessment rubric for a concept map in physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 29:197–203
  • Muller JH, Jain S, Loeser H, Irby DM. 2008. Lessons learned about integrating a medical school curriculum: Perceptions of students, faculty and curriculum leaders. Med Educ 42:778–785
  • National Research Council. 2000. How people learn. Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press
  • Neufeld VR, Woodward CA, MacLeod SM. 1989. The McMaster M.D. program: A case study of renewal in medical education. Acad Med 64(8):423–432
  • Ogur B, Hirsh D, Krupat E, Bor D. 2007. The Harvard Medical School – Cambridge integrated clerkship: An innovative model of clinical education. Acad Med 82:397–404
  • Radwany SM, Stovsky EJ, Frate DM, Dieter K, Friebert S, Palmisano B, Sanders M. 2011. A 4-year integrated curriculum in palliative care for medical undergraduates. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 28(8):528–535
  • Schmidt H. 1998. Integrating the teaching of basic sciences, clinical sciences, and biopsychosocial issues. Acad Med 73(9):S24–S31
  • Schwartz PL, Loten EG, Miller AP. 1999. Curriculum reform at the University of Otago Medical School. Acad Med 74(6):675–679
  • Scopus. 2014. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V. Available from www.scopus.com
  • Spencer AL, Brosenitsch T, Levin AS, Kanter SL. 2008. Back to the basic sciences: An innovative approach to teaching senior medical students how best to integrate basic science and clinical medicine. Acad Med 83(7):662–669
  • Swanson DB, Case SM. 1997. Assessment in basic science instruction: Directions for practice and research. Adv Health Sci Educ 2:71–84
  • Taylor DCM, Hamdy H. 2013. Adult learning theories: Implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83. Med Teach 35:e1561–e1572
  • Van der Veken J, Valcke M, De Maeseneer J, Schuwirth L, Derese A. 2009. Impact on knowledge acquisition of the transition from a conventional to an integrated contextual medical curriculum. Med Educ 43(7):704–713
  • Veronese C, Richards JR, Pernar L, Sullivan AM, Schwartzstein RM. 2013. A randomized pilot study of the use of concept maps to enhance problem-based learning among first-year medical students. Med Teach 35:e1478–e1484
  • West DC, Pomeroy JR, Park JK, Gerstenberger EA, Sandoval J. 2000. Critical thinking in graduate medical education: A role for concept mapping assessment. JAMA 284:1105–1110
  • Wijnen-Meijer M, ten Cate O, Rademakers JJ, van der Schaaf M, Borleffs JC. 2009. The influence of a vertically integrated curriculum on the transition to postgraduate training. Med Teach 31:e528–e532
  • Wijnen-Meijer M, ten Cate O, van der Schaaf M, Borleffs JC. 2010. Vertical integration in medical school: Effect on the transition to postgraduate training. Med Educ 44:272–279
  • Williams RG, Klamen DL, White CB, Petrusa E, Fincher RME, Whitfield CF, Shatzer NJ, McCarty T, Miller BM. 2011. Tracking development of clinical reasoning ability across five medical schools using a progress test. Acad Med 86:1148–1154
  • Williams RG, Klamen DL. 2012. Examining the diagnostic justification abilities of fourth-year medical students. Acad Med 87:1008–1014
  • Wood TJ, Cunnington JPW, Norman GR. 2009. Assessing the measurement properties of a clinical reasoning exercise. Teach Learn Med 12:196–200
  • Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR. 2005. The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis: Creating coherence among signs and symptoms. Med Educ 39:107–112
  • Wrigley W, van der Vleuten CPM, Freeman A, Muijtjens. 2012. A systematic framework for the progress test: Strengths, constraints, and issues. AMEE Guide No. 71. Med Teach 34:683–697
  • Yu F, Xu L, Lu D, Luo W, Wang Q. 2009. The integrated clerkship: An innovative model for delivering clinical education at the Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Acad Med 84(7):886–894

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.