Advanced search
Publication Cover
Medical Teacher Volume 38, 2016 - Issue 7
Submit an article Journal homepage
4,522
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Assessing the “I” in group work assessment: State of the art and recommendations for practice

Joost DijkstraMaastricht University, Maastricht University Office, Maastricht, the Netherlands; ;Special Interest Group on Assessment of the Netherlands Association for Medical Education (NVMO)Correspondence[email protected]
,
Mieke LatijnhouwersRadboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Radboudumc Health Academy, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; ;Special Interest Group on Assessment of the Netherlands Association for Medical Education (NVMO)
,
Adriaan NorbartLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; ;Special Interest Group on Assessment of the Netherlands Association for Medical Education (NVMO)
&
René A. TioDepartment of Cardiology and Center for Educational Development and Research in Health Professions, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;Special Interest Group on Assessment of the Netherlands Association for Medical Education (NVMO)
Pages 675-682 | Published online: 25 Apr 2016

References

  • Biggs JB, Collis KF. 1982. Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO taxonomy. New York (NY): Academic Press.
  • Caple H, Bogle M. 2013. Making group assessment transparent: what wikis can contribute to collaborative projects. Assess Eval High Educ. 38:198–210.
  • Cheng W, Warren M. 1999. Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group project. Assess Eval High Educ. 24:301–314.
  • Dancer WT, Dancer J. 1992. Peer rating in higher education. J Educ Bus. 67:306–309.
  • Davies WM. 2009. Group work as a form of assessment: common problems and recommended solutions. Higher Educ. 58:563–584.
  • Dingel M, Wei W. 2014. Influences on peer evaluation in a group project: an exploration of leadership, demographics and course performance. Assess Eval High Educ. 39:729–742.
  • Epstein RM, Hundert EM. 2002. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 287:226–235.
  • Falchikov N, J Goldfinch. 2000. Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Rev Educ Res. 70:287–322.
  • Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J, editors. 2015. CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.
  • Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Kistnasamy B. 2010. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 376:1923–1958.
  • Jin XH. 2012. A comparative study of effectiveness of peer assessment of individuals' contributions to group projects in undergraduate construction management core units. Assess Eval High Educ. 37:577–589.
  • Knight J. 2004. Comparison of student perception and performance in individual and group assessments in practical classes. J Geogr High Educ. 28:63–81.
  • Kuisma R. 2007. Portfolio assessment of an undergraduate group project. Assess Eval High Educ. 32:557–569.
  • Lejk M, Wyvill M. 2001. Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: a comparison of holistic and category-based approaches. Assess Eval High Educ. 26:61–72.
  • Lejk M, Wyvill M. 2002. The effect of the inclusion of self-assessment with peer assessment of contributions to a group project: a quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments. Assess Eval High Educ. 27:551–561.
  • Maiden B, Perry B. 2011. Dealing with free-riders in assessed group work: results from a study at a UK university. Assess Eval High Educ. 36:451–464.
  • McMullen I, Cartledge J, Finch E, Levine R, Iversen A. 2014. How we implemented team-based learning for postgraduate doctors. Med Teach. 36:191–195.
  • Orsmond P, Merry S, Reiling K. 1996. The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assess Eval High Educ. 21:239–249.
  • Parmelee DX, Michaelsen LK. 2010. Twelve tips for doing effective team-based learning (TBL). Med Teach. 32:118–122.
  • Pond K, Ui-Haq R, Wade W. 1995. Peer review: a precursor to peer assessment. Innov Educ Train Int. 32:314–323.
  • Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CP. 2011. Programmatic assessment: from assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach. 33:478–485.
  • Sharp S. 2006. Deriving individual student marks from a tutor's assessment of group work. Assess Eval High Educ. 31:329–343.
  • Spatar C, Penna N, Mills H, Kutija V, Cooke M. 2015. A robust approach for mapping group marks to individual marks using peer assessment. Assess Eval High Educ. 40:371–389.
  • Stefani AJ. 1992. Comparison of collaborative, self, peer and tutor assessment in a biochemistry practical. Biochem Educ. 20:148–151.
  • Strom PS, Strom RD, Moore EG. 1999. Peer and self-evaluation of teamwork skills. J Adolesc. 22:539–553.
  • Takeda S, Homberg F. 2014. The effects of gender on group work process and achievement: an analysis through self- and peer-assessment. Br Educ Res J. 40:373–396.
  • Tucker R. 2013. The architecture of peer assessment: do academically successful students make good teammates in design assignments? Assess Eval High Educ. 38:74–84.
  • Watson WE, Kumar K, Michaelsen LK. 1993. Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad Manag J. 36:590–602.
  • Whittemore R, Knafl K. 2005. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 52:546–553.
  • Zgheib NK, Simaan JA, Sabra R. 2010. Using team-based learning to teach pharmacology to second year medical students improves student performance. Med Teach. 32:130–135.
  • Zhang B, Ohland MW. 2009. How to assign individualized scores on a group project: an empirical evaluation. Appl Meas Educ. 22:290–308.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.