![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Thoresen S, et al 2008. Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study. British Medical Journal 337:792–805.
- Baldauff JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J, et al 1996. Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization. Obstetrics and Gynecology 88:933–938.
- Brun JL, Youbi A, Hocke C. 2002. Complications, sequelae and outcome of cervical conizations: evaluation of three surgical technics. Journal de Gynécologie, Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction (Paris) 31:558–564.
- Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al 2006. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 367:489–498.
- Panoskaltsis T, Ind TE, Perryman K, et al 2004. Needle versus loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 111:748–753.