Is it worth inducing labour in women with a previous caesarean delivery?

References

• ACOG. 2010. Practice Bulletin No. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. College Publications. Obstetrics and Gynecology 116(2 Part 1): 450–463.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agnew G, Turner MJ. 2009. Vaginal prostaglandin gel to induce labour in women with one previous caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 29:209–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brill Y, Kingdom J, Thomas J, Fraser W, Milne JK, Thomas M . 2003. The management of VBAC at term: a survey of Canadian obstetricians. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Canada 25:300–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Callwood A, Thomas J. 2000. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit. Practicing Midwife 3:34–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chilaka VN, Cole MY, Habayeb OMH, Konje JC. 2004. Risk of uterine rupture following induction of labour in women with a previous caesarean section in a large UK teaching hospital. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 24:264–265.
   Google Scholar
• Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterwell P, Nygren P, Chan BKS, Helfand M. 2004. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with a previous caesarean section. British Medical Journal 329:19–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton EF, Bujold E, McNamara H, Gauthier R, Platt RW. 2001. Dystocia among women with symptomatic uterine rupture. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 184:620–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jastrow N, Chaillet N, Roberge S, Morency AM, Lacasse Y, Bujold E. 2010. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 32:321–327.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Varner MW. 2005. The MFMU caesarean section Registry: factors affecting the success of trial labour after previous caesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 193:1016–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little MO, Lyerly AD, Mitchell LM, Armstrong EM, Harris LH, Kukla R . 2008. Mode of delivery: toward responsible inclusion of patient preferences. Obstetrics and Gynecology 112:913–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locatelli A, Regalia AL, Ghidini A, Ciriello E, Biffi A, Pezzullo JC. 2004. Risks of induction of labour in women with a uterine scar from previous low transverse caesarean section. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 111:1394–1399.
   Google Scholar
• Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. 2001. Risk of Uterine Rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. New England Journal of Medicine 345:3–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch JC, Pardy JP. 1996. Uterine rupture and scar dehiscence: A five year survey. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 24:699–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie IZ, Bradley S, Embrey MP. 1984. Vaginal prostaglandins and labour induction for patients previously delivered by caesarean section. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 91:7–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNally OM, Turner MJ. 1999. Induction of labour after 1 previous caesarean section. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 39:425–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menacker F. 2005. Trends in caesarean section rates for first births and repeat caesarean rates for low risk women: United States, 1990–2003. National Vital Statistics Reports 54:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Molloy BG, Sheil O, Duignan NM. 1987. Delivery after caesarean section: review of 2176 consecutive cases. British Medical Journal 294:1645–1647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK. 2000. Elective repeat caesarean delivery versus trial of labour: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 183:187–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCC-WCH. 2004. Clinical Guideline: Caesarean section. London: RCOG Press. April. Available at: www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG013fullguideline.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NHMRC. 2003. When does quality assurance in health care require independent ethical review? Available at: www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e46syn.htm (Accessed 8 May 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Nooh A, Baghdadi S, Raouf S. 2005. Induction of labour: How close to the evidence-based guidelines are we? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 25:451–454.
   Google Scholar
• Pathadey SD, Van Woerden HC, Jenkinson SD. 2005. Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective study in a district general hospital. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 25:662–665.
   Google Scholar
• Rageth, JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H. 1999. Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. The Swiss Working Group of Obstetric and Gynecologic Institutions. Obstetrics and Gynecology 93:332–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravasia DJ, Wood SL, Pollard JK. 2000. Uterine rupture during induced trial of labour among women with a previous caesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 183:1176–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RCOG. 2007. Birth after previous caesarean birth. Green Top Guideline No. 45. London: RCOG. Available at: www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcogcorp/GTG4511022011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• RCOG. 2011. Operative vaginal delivery. Green Top Guideline No. 26. Available at: www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/GTG26.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Smith GC, Pell JP, Pasupathy D, Dobbie R. 2004. Factors predisposing to perinatal death related to uterine rupture during attempted vaginal birth after caesarean section: retrospective cohort study. British Medical Journal 329:375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki S, Sawa R, Yoneyama Y, Asakura H, Araki T. 2000. Preoperative diagnosis of dehiscence of the lower uterine segment in patients with a single previous caesarean section. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 40:402–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor AVG, Susan Sellers, Ah-Moye M, Mackenzie IZ. 1993. A prospective random allocation trial to compare vaginal prostaglandin E2 with intravenous oxytocin for labour induction in women previously delivered by caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 13:333–336.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor DR, Doughty AS, Kaufman H, Yang L, Iannucci TA. 2002. Uterine rupture with the use of PGE2 vaginal inserts for labor induction in women with previous caesarean section. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 47:549–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner MJ, Casey C. 1996. Delivery after caesarean section: a proposal analysis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 6:513–514.
   Google Scholar
• Turner MJ. 2002. Uterine rupture. Best Practice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 16:69–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Caughey AB, Lieberman E. 1999. Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior caesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 181:882–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar