Instrumental vaginal delivery – back to basics

References

• Al-Kadri H, Sabr Y, Al-Saif S, Abulaimoun B, Ba’Aqeel H, Saleh A. 2003. Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 82:642–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anim-Somuah M, Smyth R, Howell C. 2005. Epidural versus nonepidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(4):CD000331.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony S, Buitendijk SE, Zondervan KT, van Rijssel EJ, Verkerk PH. 1994. Episiotomies and the occurrence of severe perineal lacerations. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 101:1064–1067.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Kaider A, Wagenbichler P, Leodolter S, Husslein P et al. 2001. Risk factors for third degree perineal tears in a vaginal delivery with an analysis of episiotomy types. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 46:752–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bofill JA, Rust OA, Perry KG, Roberts WE, Martin RW, Morrison JC. 1996. Operative vaginal delivery: a survey of fellows of ACOG. Obstetrics and Gynecology 88:1007–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buekens P, Lagasse R, Dramaix M, Wollast E. 1985. Episiotomy and third degree tears. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 92:820–823.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carley ME, Carley JM, Vasdev G, Lesnick TG, Webb MJ, Ramin KD et al. 2002. Factors that are associated with clinically overt postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 187:430–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen LM, Bovbjerg VE, McDavitt EC, Hullfish KL. 2003. Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 189:255–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Leeuw JW, Sruijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HC. 2001. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 108:383–387.
   Google Scholar
• de Leeuw JW, de Wit C, Kuijken JP, Bruinse HW. 2008. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115: 104–108.
   Google Scholar
• DoH, Department of Health, Welsh Office, Scottish Home and Health Department, Department of Health and Social Services, Northern Ireland. 1994. Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom, 1988–1990. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• DoH, Department of Health, Welsh Office, Scottish Home and Health Department, Department of Health and Social Services, Northern Ireland. 1998. Why mothers die. Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom, 1994–1996. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly V, Fynes M, Campbell D, Johnson H, O’Connell R, O’Herlihy C. 1998. Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstetrics and Gynecology 92:955–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eason E, Labrecque M, Wells G, Feldman P. 2000. Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: A systematic review. Obstetrics and Gynecology 95:464–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eogan M, Daly L, O’Connell P, O’Herlihy C. 2006. Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury?British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 113:190–194.
   Google Scholar
• Ezenagu LC, Kakaria R, Bofill JA. 1999. Sequential use of instruments at operative vaginal delivery: is it safe?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 180:1446–1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick M, McQuillan K, O’Herlihy C. 2001. Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome. Obstetrics and Gynecology 98:1027–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick M, Harkin R, McQuillan K, O’Brien C, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. 2002. A randomised controlled trial comparing the effects of delayed versus immediate pushing with epidural on mode of delivery and faecal continence. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 109:1359–1365.
   Google Scholar
• Gardella C, Taylor M, Benedetti T, Hitti J, Critchlow C. 2001. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 185:896–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjessing H, Backe B, Sahlin Y. 1998. Third degree obstetric tears: outcome after primary repair. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 77:736–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherman RB, Ouzounian JG, Goodwin TM. 1998. Obstetric maneuvres for shoulder dystocia and associated fetal morbidity. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 178:1126–1130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groutz A, Gordon D, Wolman I, Jaffa A, Kupferminc MJ, Lessing JB. 2001. Persistent postpartum urinary retention in contemporary obstetric practice. Definition, prevalence and clinical implications. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 46:44–48.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ, Shehmar M. 2012. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(5):CD002006.
   Google Scholar
• Handa VL, Danielsen BH, Gilbert WM. 2001. Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstetrics and Gynecology 98:225–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. 2007. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(3):CD003766.
   Google Scholar
• Jander C, Lyrenas S. 2001. Third and fourth degree perineal tears: predictor factors in a referral hospital. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 80:229–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanson RB, Menon V. 2000. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(2):CD000224.
   Google Scholar
• Kabiru WN, Jamieson D, Graves W, Lindsay M. 2001. Trends in operative vaginal delivery rates and associated maternal complication rates in an inner-city hospital. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 184:1112–1114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavender T, Walkinshaw SA. 1998. Can midwives reduce postpartum psychological morbidity?A randomized trial. Birth 25:215–219.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod NL, Gilmour DT, Joseph KS, Farrell SA, Luther ER. 2003. Trends in major risk factors for anal sphincter lacerations: a 10 year study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 25:586–593.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy DJ, Koh DK. 2007. Cohort study of the decision to delivery interval and neonatal outcome for emergency operative vaginal delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 196:145.e1–e7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Verity L, Swingler R, Patel R. 2001. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet 358:1203–1207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Patel R, Verity L, Swingler R. 2003. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 110:610–615.
   Google Scholar
• NHS. 2012. Ten Years of Maternity Claims: An analysis of NHS litigation authority data. London: NHS Litigation Authority.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell MP, Lindow SW. 2000. Trends in obstetric care in the United Kingdom. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 20:592–593.
   Google Scholar
• Olagundoye V, MacKenzie IZ. 2007. The impact of a trial of instrumental delivery in theatre on neonatal outcome. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 114:603–608.
   Google Scholar
• O’Mahony F, Hofmeyr GJ, Menon V. 2010. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(11):CD005455.
   Google Scholar
• Patel RR, Murphy DJ. 2004. Forceps delivery in modern obstetric practice. British Medical Journal 328:1302–1305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Dekker GA, Deville W, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SG. 1997. Third degree obstetric perineal tears: risk factors and the preventative role of mediolateral episiotomy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 104:563–566.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Strijers RL, Dekker GA, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SG. 1998. Third degree obstetric perineal tear: long-term clinical and functional results after primary repair. British Journal of Surgery 85:1433–1438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter HE, Brumfield CG, Cliver SP, Burgio KL, Neely CL, Varner RE. 2002. Risk factors associated with anal sphincter tear: a comparison of primiparous vaginal births after caesarean deliveries, and patients with previous vaginal delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 187:1194–1198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CL, Torvaldsen S, Cameron CA, Olive E. 2004. Delayed versus early pushing in women with epidural analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 111:1333–1340.
   Google Scholar
• Rosemann GWE. 1969. Vacuum extraction of premature infants. South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 7:10–12.
   Google Scholar
• RANZCOG. 2009a. College Statement C-Obs 13: Guidelines for use of rotational forceps. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Melbourne, Australia. Available at: www.ranzcog.edu.au/publications/statements/Cobs13.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• RANZCOG. 2009b. College Statement C-Obs 16: Instrumental vaginal delivery. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Melbourne, Australia. Available at: www.ranzcog.edu.au/publications/statements/C-obs16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• RCOG. 2011. Green-top Guideline No. 26: Operative vaginal delivery. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
   Google Scholar
• Sau A, Sau M, Ahmed H, Brown R. 2004. Vacuum extraction: is there any need to improve the current training in the UK?Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 83:466–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha P, Dutta A, Langford K. 2010. Instrumental delivery: how to meet the need for improvements in training. Obstetrician and Gynaecologist 12:265–271.
   Google Scholar
• Small R, Lumley J, Donohue L, Potter A. 2000. Waldenström U. Randomised controlled trial of midwife led debriefing to reduce maternal depression after operative childbirth. British Medical Journal 321:1043–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Monga AK, Kumar D, Stanton SL. 1999. Primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture using the overlap technique. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 106:318–323.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, Gilbert WM. 1999. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. New England Journal of Medicine 341:1709–1714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacca A. 1999. The trouble with vacuum extraction. Current Obstetrics and Gynaecology 9:41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent C, Taylor-Adams S, Chapman EJ, Hewett D, Prior S, Strange P et al. 2002. How to investigate and analyse clinical incidents: clinical risk unit and association of litigation and risk management protocol. British Medical Journal 320:777–781.
   Google Scholar
• Wood J, Amos L, Rieger N. 1998. Third degree anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics 38:414–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip SK, Sahota D, Pang MW, Chang A. 2004. Postpartum urinary retention. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 83:881–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar