References
- Concato J. 2000. Randomised, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. New England Journal of Medicine 342:1887–1892.
- Concato J. 2004. Observational versus experimental studies: what's the evidence for hierarchy?NeuroRx 1:341–347.
- Glickman S, McHutchison J, Peterson E, Cairns C, Harrington R, Califf R et al. 2009. Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine 360:816–823.
- Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2007. Learning what works best: The nation's need for evidence on comparative effectiveness in health care. Available at: www.iom.edu/˜/media/files/activity%20files/quality/VSRT/ComparativeEffectivenessWhitePaperF.ashx (Accessed 12 January 2010).
- O’Brien S. 2006. Setting Standards to improve women's health: RCOG Response to Cooksey Review of UK Health Resource. London: RCOG.
- Smith T, Sime P. 2001.A survey of clinical academic staffing levels in UK medical and dental schools: A report by to the Council of Heads of Medical Schools and Deans of Faculties of Medicine.
- Wald D. 2004. Bureaucracy of ethics applications. British Medical Journal 329:280–284.
- Ward HJ, Cousens SN, Smith-Bathgate B, Leitch M, Everington D, Will RG et al. 2004. Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general population. British Medical Journal 329:277–279.