![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Bartusevicius A, Barcaite E, Krikstolaitis R, Gintautas V, Nadisauskiene R. 2006. Sublingual compared with vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 113:1431–1437.
- Bartusevicius A, Barcaite E, Nadisauskiene R. 2005. Oral, vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labor. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 91:2–9.
- Caliskan E, Bodur H, Ozeren S, Corakci A, Ozkan S, Yucesoy I. 2005. Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study. Gynecologic and obstetric investigation 59:155–161.
- Geels YP, de Gouberville MC, Visser L, van Asten HA. 2010. Comparing vaginal and sublingual administration of misoprostol for labour induction in women with intra-uterine fetal death. Tropical Doctor 40:77–80.
- Nassar AH, Awwad J, Khalil AM, Abu-Musa A, Mehio G, Usta IM. 2007. A randomised comparison of patient satisfaction with vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labour at term. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 114:1215–1221.
- Souza AS, Amorim MM, Feitosa FE. 2008. Comparison of sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour: a systematic review. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115:1340–1349.
- Vimala N, Mittal S, Kumar S, Dadhwal V, Sharma Y. 2004. A randomized comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before suction termination of first-trimester pregnancy. Contraception 70:117–120.
- Zahran KM, Shahin AY, Abdellah MS, Elsayh KI. 2009. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized prospective placebo-controlled study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 35:1054–1060.