Comparison of Pipelle sampler with conventional dilatation and curettage (D&C) for Chinese endometrial biopsy

References

• Abdelazim, IA, Aboelezz A, Abdulkareem AF. 2013. Pipelle endometrial sampling versus conventional dilatation & curettage in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Journal of the Turkish German Gynecology Association 14:1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abulafia O, Shah T, Salame G, Economos K, Serur E, Zinn H et al. 2011. Sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings of pelvic abscess following uterine perforation sustained during office endometrial sampling. Journal of Medical Ultrasound 39:283–286.
   Google Scholar
• Dacco MD, Moustafa M, Papoutsis D, Georgantzis D, Halmos G, Magos A. 2012. An audit of using the H Pipelle for endometrial sampling at outpatient hysteroscopy and literature review comparison with the Pipelle de Cornier. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 165: 299–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirkiran F, Yavuz E, Erenel H, Bese T, Arvas M, Sanioglu C. 2012. Which is the best technique for endometrial sampling? Aspiration (pipelle) versus dilatation and curettage (D & C). Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 286:1277–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkhuizen FP, Mol BW, Brölmann HA, Heintz AP. 2000. The accuracy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia: A meta-analysis. Cancer 89:1765–1772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djurdjevic S, Stojanovic S, Kopitovic V, Hadnadjev D. 2009. Diagnostic value of endosonography scoring systems in the detection of ovarian and endometrial carcinoma. Journal of Balkan Union of Oncology 14:97–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dongol A, Shrestha A, Chawla C. 2010. Post partum haemorrhage: Prevalence, morbidity and management pattern in Dhulikhel Hospital. Kathmandu University Medical Journal 8:212–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fakhar S, Saeed G, Khan AH, Alam AY. 2008. Validity of pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Annals of Saudi Medicine 28:188–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guler A, Sahin HG, Kucukaydin Z, Erdemoglu E. 2010. Comparison of the efficacy of intrauterine lidocaine, paracervical block and oral etodolac for decreasing pain in endometrial biopsy. Journal of the Turkish German Gynecology Association 11:178–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karadadas N, Sirkeci F, Akercan F, Ulukus M, Kazandi M. 2003. Retrospective analysis of endometrial polyps carried out at Ege University Hospital. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology 31:137–138.
   Google Scholar
• Kazandi M, Okmen F, Ergenoglu AM, Yeniel AO, Zeybek B, Zekioglu O, Ozdemir N. 2012. Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 32:790–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurosawa H, Ito K, Nikura H, Takano T, Nagase S, Utsunomiya H et al. 2012. Hysteroscopic inspection and total curettage are insufficient for discriminating endometrial cancer from atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine 228:365–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madari S, Al-Shabibi N, Papalampros P, Papadimitriou A, Magos A. 2009. A randomised trial comparing the H Pipelle with the standard Pipelle for endometrial sampling at ‘no-touch’(vaginoscopic) hysteroscopy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 116:32–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMenamin M, Lysakova-Devine T, Wingfield M, O’Herlihy C, O’Farrelly C. 2012. Endometrial aspiration biopsy: a non-invasive method of obtaining functional lymphoid progenitor cells and mature natural killer cells. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 25:322–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngu SF, Cheung VY, Pun TC. 2012. Randomized study of vaginoscopy and H Pipelle vs traditional hysteroscopy and standard Pipelle. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 19:206–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hanlan KA, Huang GS, Garnier AC, Dibble SL, Reuland ML, Lopez L, Pinto RL. 2005. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: cohort review of patients with uterine neoplasia. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 9:277–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozaki K, Suzuki S. 2013. Uterine perforation with omentum incarceration after dilatation and evacuation/curettage. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Polena V, Mergui JL, Zerat L, Sananes S. 2007. The role of Pipelle Mark II sampling in endometrial disease diagnosis. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 134:233–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ries A, Singson P, Bidus M, Barnes JG. 2000. Use of the endometrial pipelle in the diagnosis of early abnormal gestations. Fertility and Sterility 74:593–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadia A, Mubarik A, Zubair A, Jamal S, Zafar A. 2011. Diagnostic accuracy of endometrial curettage in endometrial pathology. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad 23:129–131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soeda S, Ushijima J, Furukawa S, Miyajima M, Sakuma K, Watanabe T et al. 2012. Uterine arteriovenous malformation formed in a large uterine cervical myoma. Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine 228:181–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams A, Brechin S, Porter A, Warner P, Critchley H. 2008. Factors affecting adequacy of Pipelle and Tao Brush endometrial sampling. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115:1028–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar