Management of female urinary incontinence: A survey of urogynaecologists’ view on the NICE guideline

References

• Ayres CG, Griffith HM. 2007. Perceived barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of priority clinical preventive services guidelines. American Journal of Managed Care 13:150–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiardini I, Braido F, Bonini M, Compalati E, Canonica G. 2009. Why do doctors and patients not follow guidelines? Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology 9:228–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu M, Duckett JR, Moran P, Freeman R. 2009. Clinician's Views on the NICE Guideline on the Management of Female Urinary Incontinence. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 29:529–532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer MS. 2002. A review of quatitative studies of adherence of mental health clinical practice guidelines. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 10:138–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabana MD, Kim C. 2003. Physicians adherence to preventive cardiology guidelines for women. Women's Health Issues 13:142–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckett J, Jain S, Tamilselvi A, Moran P, Richmond D. 2004. National audit of incontinence surgery in the United Kingdom. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 24:785–793
   Google Scholar
• Feroci F, Lenzi E, Baraghini M, Cantafio S, Scatizzi M. 2012General Surgeons’ View on Oncologic Mutlidisciplinary Group Meetings as part of Colorectal Cancer Care 64:273–278
   Google Scholar
• Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, Dunlop DJ. 2005. An evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary team, in a single centre, on treatment and survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. British Journal of Cancer 93:977–978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geoffrion R. 2012. Treatments of Overactive Bladder – A focus on pharmacotherapy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 34: 1092–1101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grol R & Grimshaw J. 2003. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change. Lancet 362:1225–1230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbison P, Hay-Smith J, Ellis G, Moore K. 2003. Effectiveness of anticholinergic drugs compared with placebo in the treatment of overactive bladder: Systematic Review. BMJ 326:841–844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houwert RM, Venema PL, Aquaris AE, Bruinse HW, Kil PJ, Vervest HA. 2009. Predictive value of urodynamics on outcome after midurethral sling surgery for female stress urinary incontinence. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 200:649. e1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler TM, Bachmann LM, Minder C, Löhrer D, Umbehr M, Schünemann HJ, et al. 2011. Adverse Event Assessment of Antimuscarinics for Treating Overactive Bladder: A Network Meta-analytic approach. PLoS One 6:e16718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kongsved SM, Basnov M, Holm-Christensen K, Hjollund NH. 2007. Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: a randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions. Journal of Medical Internet Research 9:e25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuroki L, Stuckey A, Hirway P, Raker CA, Bandera CA, DiSivestro PA, et al. 2010. Addressing Clinical Trials: Can Multidisciplinary Tumour Board Improve participation? A study from an academic women's cancer program Gynecologic Oncology 116:295–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leso PB, Coward JI, Letsa I, Schick U, Nandhabalan M, Frentzas S, et al. 2013. A Study of the decision Outcomes and Financial Costs of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings (MDMs) in Oncology. British Journal of Cancer 109:2295–2300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzaferri V, Manjo P. 2011. Principles for the best multidisciplinary meetings. The Lancet Oncology 12:323–325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta N. 2004. The doctors’ challenge: How can we follow guidelines better? Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 71:81–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman H, Zycznski HM, Varner RE, Amundsen C, et al. 2012. A Randomized Trial of Urodynamic Testing before Stress-Incontinence Surgery. The New England Journal of Medicine 366:1987–1997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2013. Urinary Incontinence: The management of urinary incontinence in women. CG171. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
   Google Scholar
• Novara G, Artibani W, Barber M, Chapple CR, Constantini E, Ficarra V, et al. 2010. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings and mid-urethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence European Urology58:218–238
   Google Scholar
• Prior M, Guerin M. 2008. The effectiveness of clinical guidelines implementation strategies: a synthesis of systematic review findings. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14:888–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens MR, Lewis WG, Brewster AE, Lord I, Blackshaw GR, Hodzovic I, et al. 2006. Mutlidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for oesophageal cancer. Diseases of the Esophagus 19:164–171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taddei T. 2013. A Multidisciplinary Approach. J Clinic Gastroeneterol 47:S27–29
   Google Scholar
• van Leijsen SA, Kluivers KB, Mol BW, Hout Ji, Milani AL, Roovers JP, et al. 2013. Value of Urodynamics before stress urinary incontinence surgery – A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology 121:999–1007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuidgeest M, Hendriks M, Koopman L, Spreeuwenberg P, Rademakers J. 2011. A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients’ experiences with breast care. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13:e68.
   Google Scholar