Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Volume 36, 2016 - Issue 6
Submit an article Journal homepage
130
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Is there a correlation between aberrant embryonic crown-rump length growth velocities and subsequent birth weights?

Max MongelliAcute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, and Correspondence[email protected]
,
Chuan LuDepartment of Computer Science, Aberystwyth University, Wales, UK
,
Shannon ReidAcute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, and
,
Nicole StamatopoulosAcute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, and
,
Kaantharuban SankaralingamAcute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, and
,
Ishwari CasikarAcute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, and
,
Nigel HardyDepartment of Computer Science, Aberystwyth University, Wales, UK
&
George CondousAcute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, and
show all
Pages 726-730 | Published online: 25 Mar 2016

References

  • Barker DJ. 2006. Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 49:270–283.
  • Bottomley C, Daemen A, Mukri F, Papageorghiou AT, Kirk E, Pexsters A, et al. 2009. Assessing first trimester growth: the influence of ethnic background and maternal age. Human Reproduction 24:284–290.
  • Bukowski R, Smith GC, Malone FD, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, et al. 2007. Fetal growth in early pregnancy and risk of delivering low birth weight infant: prospective cohort study. BMJ 334:836.
  • Drugan A, Johnson MP, Isada NB, Holzgreve W, Zador IE, Dombrowski MP, et al. 1992. The smaller than expected first-trimester fetus is at increased risk for chromosome anomalies. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 167:1525–1528.
  • Geirsson RT. 1991. Ultrasound instead of last menstrual period as the basis of gestational age assignment. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 1:212–219.
  • Kramer MS. 1987. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ 65:663–737.
  • Larkin JC, Speer PD, Simhan HN. 2011. A customized standard of large size for gestational age to predict intrapartum morbidity. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 204:499.e1–410.
  • Mahendru AA, Daemen A, Everett TR, Wilkinson IB, McEniery CM, Abdallah Y, et al. 2012. Impact of ovulation and implantation timing on first-trimester crown-rump length and gestational age. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 40:630–635.
  • Mongelli M, Figueras F, Francis A, Gardosi J. 2007. A customized birthweight centile calculator developed for an Australian population. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 47:128–131.
  • Mook-Kanamori DO, Steegers EA, Eilers PH, Raat H, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW. 2010. Risk factors and outcomes associated with first-trimester fetal growth restriction. JAMA 303:527–534.
  • Popat VB, Prodanov T, Calis KA, Nelson LM. 2008. The menstrual cycle: a biological marker of general health in adolescents. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1135:43–51.
  • Salomon LJ, Hourrier S, Fanchin R, Ville Y, Rozenberg P. 2011. Is first-trimester crown-rump length associated with birthweight? BJOG 118:1223–1228.
  • Smith GC, Smith MF, McNay MB, Fleming JE. 1998. First-trimester growth and the risk of low birth weight. New England Journal of Medicine 339:1817–1822.
  • Tuuli MG, Cahill A, Stamilio D, Macones G, Odibo AO. 2011. Comparative efficiency of measures of early fetal growth restriction for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology 117:1331–1340.
  • Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. 2000. Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.