![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Bagga R, Takhtani M, Suri V, Adhikari K, Arora S, Bhardwaj S, et al. 2010. Cervical length and cervicovaginal HCG for prediction of pre-term birth in women with signs and symptoms of pre-term labour. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 30:451–455.
- Bennett SJ, Waterstone JJ, Cheng WC, Parsons J. 1993. Complications of transvaginal ultrasound-directed follicle aspiration: a review of 2670 consecutive procedures. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 10:72–77.
- Berghella V, Baxter JK, Hendrix NW. 2013. Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review 1:CD007235.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. 2003. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 22:85–93.
- Carr DB, Smith K, Parsons L, Chansky K, Shields LE. 2000. Ultrasonoraphy for cervical length measurement: agreement between transvaginal and translabial techniques. Obstetrics and Gynecology 96:554–558.
- Cicero S, Skentou C, Souka A, To MS, Nicolaides KH. 2001. Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparion of transvaginal-translabial ultrasonography. Ultrasound in Obstetrics Gynecology 17:335–340.
- Eggebo TM, Gjessing LK, Heien C, Smedvig E, Økland I, Romundstad P, et al. 2006. Prediction of labor and delivery by tranperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 27:387–391.
- Gauthier T, Marin B, Garuchet-bigot A. 2014. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement and preterm labor. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 290:465–469.
- Gramellini D, Fieni S, Kaihura C, Modena AB. 2007. Cervical length as a predictor of preterm delivery: gestational age-related percentiles vs fixed cut-offs. of delivery gestational age related vs cutoffs. Acta Biomedica 78:220–224.
- Goffinet F, Rozenberg P, Kayem G, Perdu M, Philippe HJ, Nisand I. 1997. The value of intravaginal ultrasonography of the cervix uteri for evaluation of the risk of premature labor. Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction 26:623–629.
- Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA, Farrell TA, DeLong DM. 2001. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix: transperineal versus endovaginal imaging. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 20:1071–1078.
- Homeira V, Khorami F, Heydari ST, Ghaffarpasand F. 2014. Predictive value of cervical length measurement by transvaginal and transperineal ultrasonography for preterm delivery. Shiraz E-Medical Journal 15:352.
- Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, et al. 1996. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med 334:567–572.
- Kurtzman JT, Goldsmith LJ, Gall SA, Spinnato JA. 1998. Transvaginal versus transperineal ultrasonography: a blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation. comparison the of length midgestation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 179:852–857.
- Meijer-Hoogeven M, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GH. 2006. Methods of sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnancy: a review of literature. Journal of Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Medicine 19:755–762.
- Owen J, Neely C, Northen A. 1999. Transperineal versus endovaginal ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in the midtrimester: a blinded comparison. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 181:780–783.
- Ozdemir I, Demirci F, Yucel O. 2005. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 45:191–194.
- Yazici G, Yildiz A, Tiras MB. 2004. Comparison of transperineal and transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm delivery. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 32:225–230.