![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Bayless R. B., Boyers S. P. Anatomic cervical factor. Decision Making in Infertility, A. H. DeCherney. Deckser, Toronto 1988; 52–55
- Chakraborti D. K. Pregnancy following repair operations for genital prolapse. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India 1985; 35: 282–285
- Chowdhury N., Banerjee S. K. A comparative study of the operative results in nulliparous and uniparous prolapse. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India 1985; 35: 1146–1148
- Davajan V., Nakamura R. M. The cervical factor. Progress in Infertility2nd edition, S. J. Behrman, R. W. Kistner. Little Brown, Boston 1975; 37–39
- Desai P., Pandya P. Surgical conservation in prolapse. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India 1991; 41: 528–532
- Fonseca M. S., Ambiye V. R., Khedekar C. N., Karam‐chandani V., Vaidya P. R. Pregnancy and prolapse–a study of reproductive performance during pregnancy and pregnancy following repair operations. Bombay Hospital Journal 1991; 33: 42–44
- Gupta A. S., Koley S. K. Follow up study of Manchester operation for genital prolapse. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India 1987; 37: 161–164
- Massler D. J., Devanesan M. M. Sexual consequences of gynaecologic operations. Sexual Consequences of Disability, A. Comfort. George Stickley, Philadelphia 1978; 486–490
- Misra J., Jha R. K. Outcome of pregnancy and labour after repair of prolapse of the uterus. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India 1985; 35: 102–104
- Shirodkar V. N. Contributions to Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Livingstone, Edinburgh 1960; 56–70