81
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Contact Sensitivity to Selected Acrylate Compounds in B6C3F1 Mice: Relative Potency, Cross Reactivity, and Comparison of Test Methods

&
Pages 491-506 | Published online: 27 Sep 2008

References

  • Tosti A., Guerra L., Bardazzi F. Occupational contact dermatitis from exposure to epoxy resins and acrylates. Clinics in Dermatology (1992); 10: 133–140
  • Hemmer W., Focke M., Wantke F., Gotz M., * R. Allergic contact dermatitis to artificial fingernails prepared from UV light-cured acrylates. J Am Acad Dermatol (1996); 35: 377–380
  • Agner T., Menne T. Sensitization to acrylates in a dental patient. Contact Dermatitis (1994); 30: 249–250
  • Kanerva L., Estlander T., Jolanki R., Tarvainen K. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by exposure to acrylates during work with dental prostheses. Contact Dermatitis (1993); 28: 268–275
  • Tosti A., Guerra L., Vincenzi C., Peluso A. M. Occupational skin hazards from synthetic plastics. Toxicology and Industrial Health (1993); 9: 493–502
  • Cronin E. Plastics. Contact dermatitis (1980); 575–663
  • Gad S., Dunn B., Dobbs D., Reilly C., Walsh R. Development and validation of an alternative dermal sensitization test: the mouse ear swelling test (Mest). Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (1986); 84: 93–114
  • Kimber I., Mitchell J. A., Griffin A. C. Development of a murine local lymph node assay for the determination of sensitizing potential. Food and Chemical Toxicology (1986); 24: 585–586
  • Hayes B. B., Gerber P. C., Griffey S. S., Meade B. J. Contact hypersensitivity to dicyclohexylcarbodiimide and diisopropylcarbodiimide in female B6C3F1 mice. Drug and Chemical Toxicology (1998); 21: 195–206
  • Kimber I., Weisenberger C. A murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergens: Assay development and results of an initial validation study. Arch Toxicol (1989); 63: 274–282
  • Bartlett M. S. Sub-sampling for attributes. Journal of Royal Statistics Society Supplement (1937); 4: 131–135
  • Kruskall W. H., Wallis W. A. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of American Statistical Association (1952); 47: 583–621
  • Dunnett C. W. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. Journal of American Statistical Association (1955); 50: 1096–1121
  • Gross A. J., Clark V. A. Gehan-Wilcoxon Test. Survival Distribution: Reliability Applications in Biomedical Sciences (1975); 120–123
  • Hollander M., Wolfe D. A. Jonckheere's Test. Non-Parametric Statistics Methods (1975); 120–123
  • Parsons R. D., Baldwin R. C., Hayes A. W. Delayed contact hypersensitivity of guinea pigs to ethyl acrylate. Toxicologist (1981); 1: 17
  • Van der Walle H. B., Klecak G., Geieick H., Bensink T. Sensitizing potential of 14 mono(meth) acrylates in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis (1982); 8: 223–225
  • Parker D., Turk J. L. Contact sensitivity to acrylate compounds in guinea pigs. Contact Dermatitis (1983); 9: 55–60
  • Dahlquist I., Fregert S., Trulson L. Contact allergy to trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA) in an aziridine plastic hardener. Contact Dermatitis (1983); 9: 122–124
  • Kimber I. Skin sensitization [EA negative in murine local lymph node assay]. In ECETOC Joint Assessment of Commodity Chemicals: Report No. 28. Ethyl Acrylate (CAS No. 140-88-5), J M Mackay, (1994); 30
  • Jordan W. P. Cross-sensitization patterns in acrylate allergies. Contact Dermatitis (1975); 1: 13–15
  • Opdyke D. L.J. Ethyl acrylate, monograph on raw materials. Food Cosmet Toxicol suppl (1975); 13: 801–802
  • Kanerva L., Estlander T., Jolanki R. Sensitization to patch test acrylates. Contact Dermatitis (1988); 18: 10–15
  • Kanerva L., Estlander T., Jolanki R., Henriks-Eckerman M. Allergy caused by acrylate compounds at the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH) 1975-1995. Sixth US-Finnish Joint Symposium on Occupational Health and Safety, People and Work. (1995); 128–134
  • Rustemeyer T., de Groot J., von Blomberg B. M.E., Frosch P. J., Scheper R. J. Cross-reactivity patterns of contact-sensitizing methacrylates. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (1998); 148: 83–90
  • Kimber I., Hilton J., Dearman R., Gerberick F., Ryan C., Basketter D., Lea L., House R., Ladies G., Loveless S., Hastings K. Assessment of the skin sensitization potential of topical medicants using the local lymph node assay: an interlaboratory evaluation. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health (1998); 53: 563–579

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.