Publication Cover
Archives of Andrology
Journal of Reproductive Systems
Volume 7, 1981 - Issue 1
1,839
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Effects of Shaking and Centrifugation on Human Sperm Motility

&
Pages 21-26 | Received 15 Jul 1980, Published online: 09 Jul 2009

References

  • Eliasson R. Semen analysis. Progress in Infertility, SJ Behrman, RW Kistner. Little, Brown & Co, Boston 1975; 691–713
  • Freund M, Carol B. Factors affecting hemocytometer counts of sperm concentration in human semen. J Reprod Fertil 1960; 8: 149–156
  • Homonay TZ, Paz G, Sofer A, Kreicer PF. Effects of caffeine on motility, velocity, oxygen consumption and glycolysis of ejaculated human normokynetic and hypokynectic spermatozoa. Int J Fertil 1976; 21: 163–168
  • Jone RC, Holt WV. The effects of washing on the ultrastructure and cytochemistry of ram spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1974; 41: 159
  • Makler A. A new chamber for rapid sperm count and motility evaluation. Fertil Steril 1978; 29: 313–318
  • Makler A. A new multiple exposure photography (MEP) method for objective sperm motility determination. Fertil Steril 1978; 30: 192–199
  • Makler A. Simultaneous differentiation between motile, non motile, live and dead spermatozoa by combining the supravital staining and the MEP method. Intern J Androl 1978; 2: 32–42
  • Makler A, Zaidise I, Brandes JM. Elimination of technical induced errors during routine human sperm motility analysis. Archiv Androl 1979; 2: 201–210
  • Makler A. Use of the elaborated MEP method in routine sperm motility analysis and for research purposes. Fertil Steril 1980; 33: 160–166
  • Makler A. The improved 10 μm chamber for rapid sperm analysis. Fertil Steril 1980; 33: 337–338
  • Makler A. Use of a microcomputer in combination with the MEP method for sperm motility determination. J Urol 1980; 124: 372–375
  • Shulman S, Harlin B, Davis P, Reyniak JV. Immune infertility and new approaches to treatment. Fertil Steril 1978; 29: 309–314
  • Singer R, Bonnet M, Allalouf P, Chomers T. Sensitivity of human spermatozoa to various isolation procedures: Differences in relation to sperm count. Intern J Fertil 1979; 24: 33–39

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.