The Frequency Doubling Illusion and Testing of Magnocellular Sensitivity

REFERENCES

• Kelly DH. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Optic Soc Am 1966;56:1628–1633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pammer K, Wheatley C. Isolating the M(y)-cell response in dyslexia using the spatial frequency doubling illusion. Vision Res 2001;41:2139–2147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddess T, Goldberg I, Dobinson J, Wine S, Welsh AH, James AC. Testing for glaucoma with the spatial frequency doubling illusion. Vision Res 1999;39:4258–4273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merigan WH, Maunsell JH. How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annu Rev Neurosci 1993;16:369–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enroth-Cugell C, Robson JG. The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J Physiol 1966;187:517–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White AJ, Sun H, Swanson WH, Lee BB. An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:3590–3599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt JB, Schumer RA, Sherman SM, Spear PD, Movshon JA. Visual response properties of neurons in the LGN of normally reared and visually deprived macaque monkeys. J Neurophysiol 2001;85:2111–2129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddess T, James AC, Goldberg I, Wine S, Dobinson J. Comparing a parallel PERG, automated perimetry, and frequency-doubling thresholds. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:3827–3832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeppieri M, Demirel S, Kent K, Johnson CA. Perceived spatial frequency of sinusoidal gratings. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:318–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosli Y, Bedford SM, Maddess T. Low-spatial-frequency channels and the spatial frequency doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50;1956–1963.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kevan A, Pammer K. Visual deficits in pre-readers at familial risk for dyslexia. Vision Res 2008;48:2835–2839.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giuffre I. Frequency doubling technology vs standard automated perimetry in ocular hypertensive patients. Open Ophthalmol J 2009;3:6–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Mechanisms isolated by frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:398–401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler CW. Observations on spatial-frequency doubling. Perception 1974;3:81–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher B, Fukada Y, Rodieck RW. Identification, classification and anatomical segregation of cells with X-like and Y-like properties in the lateral geniculate nucleus of old-world primates. J Physiol 1976;258:433–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakemore C, Vital-Durand F. Organization and post-natal development of the monkey’s lateral geniculate nucleus. J Physiol 1986;380:453–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan E, Shapley RM. X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys. J Physiol 1982;330:125–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevan A, Pammer K. Predicting early reading skills from pre-reading measures of dorsal stream functioning. Neuropsychologia 2009;47:3174–3181.
   Google Scholar
• Kulikowski JJ. Apparent fineness of briefly presented gratings: balance between movement and pattern channels. Vision Res 1975;15:673–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pammer K, Connell E, Kevan A. Spelling and Reading: Using visual sensitivity to explore shared or separate orthographic representations. Perception 2010;39:387–406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Movshon JA, Kiorpes L, Hawken MJ, Cavanaugh JR. Functional maturation of the macaque’s lateral geniculate nucleus. J Neurosci 2005;25:2712–2722.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skottun BC, Skoyles JR. Temporal frequency and the magnocellular and parvocellular systems. Neuro-Ophthmology 2008;32:43–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontsevich LL, Tyler CW. Relative contributions of sustained and transient pathways to human stereoprocessing. Vision Res 2000;3245–3255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawken MJ, Shapley R, Grosof DH. Temporal-frequency selectivity in monkey visual cortex. Visual Neurosci 1996;13:477–492.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skottun BC. The magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia: the evidence from contrast sensitivity. Vision Res 2000;40:111–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevan A, Pammer K. Making the link between dorsal stream sensitivity and reading. Neuroreport 2008;19:467–470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skottun BC, Skoyles JR. Letter to the editor. J Learn Disabil 2005;38:386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone MS, Rosen GD, Drislane FW, Galaburda AM. Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991;88:7943–7947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor JD, Conte MM, Burton L, Nass RD. Visual evoked potentials in dyslexics and normals: failure to find a difference in transient or steady-state responses. Visual Neurosci 1993;10:939–946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannes S, Kussmaul CL, Munthe TF, Mangun GR. Developmental dyslexia: passive visual stimulation provides no evidence for a magnocellular processing defect. Neuropsychologia 1996;34:1123–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueder GT, Ruben JB, Blocker RJ, Granet DB, Karr DJ, Lehman SS, Troia SJ, Ellis GS, Morse CL, Repka MX, Arnoldi K, Handler S, Fierson WM, Lipinsky L, Murphy NA, Burke R, Desch LW, Duby JC, Elias ER, Levy SE, Liptak GS, McNeal D, Myers SM, Norwood KW, Sagerman PJ, Lipkin PH, Skipper SM. Joint statement—Learning disabilities, dyslexia, and vision. Pediatrics 2009;124:837–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handler, SM, Fierson, WM, and the Section on Ophthalmology and Council on Children with Disabilities. Joint technical report—Learning disabilities, dyslexia, and vision. Pediatrics 2011;127:e818–e856 (DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010–3670).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoyles JR., Skottun BC. Conflicting data about dyslexia’s cause. Science 2009;326:228–229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlyn DW. Psychology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1957.
   Google Scholar